Posted without readable text

Channel
بيت التمريض
@KSANurse2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,190subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001732854079 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KSANurse2 |
| Description | بيت التمريض |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KSANurse2 |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:50 | 7,190 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 20:46 | 7,197 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 18:00 | 7,204 | -18 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 7,222 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:04 | 7,224 | -9 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 7,233 | -1 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 14:41 | 7,234 | -10 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 7,244 | +15 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 7,229 | +20 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 7,209 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 7,215 | +3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 7,212 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:23 | 7,219 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 7,224 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 7,232 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 7,238 | +6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 7,232 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 7,231 | first reading |
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.33%
- avg views ÷ 7,190 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 455
- 25 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.193%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 25
- of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (3 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,379 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 307
- Videos
- 52
- Links
- 41
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
16 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 68.8% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
تنبيه⛔️ انتشرت اعلانات كثيرة نشر و كتابة ابحاث في قروبات التليقرام وعلى الخاص واستغلال حاجة الكثير من المتقدمين خاصة على البورد. نحذر بعدم التعامل معهم او تحويل اي مبالغ ماليه وسوف يتم حذف اي اعلان من هذا النوع لانها رسائل احتيال ونصب اداره القروب غير مسؤله عن اي عملية نصب واحتيال واللي عنده الرغبة في المشاركة في ابحاث عليه التواصل مع إدارة القروب في حاله توفرت عندهم بيفيدوك إدارة القروب @Prince8843 @MohammedJoudah
Signed Prince
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
👏2
Photo, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @KSANurse2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 16 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
A child presents with intermittent abdominal pain and "currant jelly stool." Which diagnostic procedure confirms intussusception?
- A. CT scan19%
- B. Ultrasound41%
- C. Barium enema39%
- D. X-ray15%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
A child presents with signs of dehydration. What is the most reliable method to assess severity?
- A. Capillary refill >3 seconds31%
- B. Monitor intake and output50%
- C. Urine ketones8%
- D. Urine specific gravity17%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Q.mother has a son with a gastric tube. How can the nurse teach the mother if the tube falls out?
- A. Come to the emergency department immediately.46%
- B. Cover the site with a dressing.38%
- C. Clean the area with water and soap.13%
- D. Reinsert the tube herself.6%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Which of the following is the most useful initial test for assessing proteinuria?
- A. Serum creatinine7%
- B. 24-hour urine volume25%
- C. Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio35%
- D. Urinalysis41%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
A patient has difficulty walking because of pain from rheumatoid arthritis. Which NANDA nursing diagnosis is most appropriate?
- A. Activity intolerance9%
- B. Acute pain20%
- C. Impaired physical mobility58%
- D. Risk for falls23%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
A patient is allergic to penicillin, but the medication tray contains Ampicillin. What should the nurse do FIRST?
- A. Administer the medication.4%
- B. Verify the allergy and hold the medication.77%
- C. Give half the dose.2%
- D. Ask the patient if they have taken it before.21%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nursingrecruitmentchannel · 22,640
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 September 2026
@SAEED5ALAKLABI · 66,028
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 21 August 2026
@EgyNursology · 67,948
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بيت التمريض” (@KSANurse2), 7,190 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KSANurse2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.