朝鮮(조선) https://t.me/JOSEONKOREAV DIOR FREE https://t.me/DIORFREE 💬 𝐓𝐇𝐎𝐌 𝐁𝐑𝐎𝐖𝐍𝐄 https://t.me/ThomBrowne_Free FENDI자유홍보방 https://t.me/FENDI_FD 🔸HERMES FREE🔸 https://t.me/HERMES_HM 🇰🇷조선본방 입장문의🇰🇷: @BDWOMDO 🇰🇷조선보증거래 문의🇰🇷: @joseonvvip 🇰🇷조선제휴 입점문의🇰🇷: @VVIPjoseon 🇰🇷조선사기 제보문의🇰🇷: @VVIPjoseonn 🇰🇷조선제휴채널: @JOSEONWPGB 🇰🇷조선 사기조회박제채널: @JOSEONTKRL 🇰🇷조선 공지방: @KOREAJOSEON 🇰🇷조선꽁포모음방: @josaon

Channel
조선공지방
@KOREAJOSEON
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
199subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003817561337 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KOREAJOSEON |
| Created | 22 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KOREAJOSEON |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:46 | 199 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:22 | 201 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:52 | 201 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.61%
- avg views ÷ 199 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5.2
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (22 May 2026 – 19 October 2026) |
| Views total | 26 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
@PApplePAY 제휴종료
@TELRETOPING 제휴종료
@ATM_COINPAY 제휴종료
@poison010poison 제휴종료
@GR025 @HGG082 @NobleOTC @DB_1004 @zoxx_c @GPTCOIN24 @YS112 @router6969 제보 들어왔습니다 현재 위 계정들은 동일인물이라고 합니다 당한사람들도 있다니 조심하시고 거래하지 마십쇼. 🖥H현대마케팅 🖥 9월 17일 제휴종료.
포이즌010 제휴입점. 3개월 제휴
새벽대리결제 제휴입점. 3개월 제휴
저희는 제휴를 아무나 받지 않습니다. 다른방 같은 경우들은 돈만주면 제휴를 받지만 저희는 업종인증부터 받습니다. 업종인증 하다가 허위인거 걸리면 추방까지 드리겠습니다.
텔레토 핑제휴입점. 3개월 제휴
ATM코인결제제휴입점. 3개월 제휴
애플🅟🅐🅨 제휴입점. 6개월 제휴
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @KOREAJOSEON. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@KOREAJOSEON named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 4 November 2026 – 4 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“조선공지방” (@KOREAJOSEON), 199 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KOREAJOSEON.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.