康娜美化使用以及写配置教程 电报下载速度慢点我前往浏览器查看
❤21👍2🥴2

Channel
@KNMHNB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15,656subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002172637434 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KNMHNB |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KNMHNB |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 15,656 | +15 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 15,641 | -17 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 15,658 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 15,665 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 15,669 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 15,679 | +14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 15,665 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 26 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
569 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 199 | 35.0% | |
| 👍 | 186 | 32.7% | |
| 😭 | 49 | 8.61% | |
| 🤩 | 41 | 7.21% | |
| 🍌 | 39 | 6.85% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 4.04% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 1.76% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 1.23% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 0.879% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.703% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 0.527% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.351% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.176% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 569reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2025 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
康娜美化使用以及写配置教程 电报下载速度慢点我前往浏览器查看
❤21👍2🥴2
康娜配置美化-2.8 更新内容: 1.新增物品数据表比较 2.修复人物美化不捡头盔背包也会自动美化 3.改进了物品数据表导出的格式 4.优化启动方式,可在任意路径执行程序
👍25❤5
贫民窟最新QQ群:1022121237 有问题可以进来反馈,没有也可以进来聊聊天 有好东西都会分享在QQ群
👍5❤2
Video, posted without a caption
❤13👏1
康娜配置美化-2.5 更新内容: 1.适配和平精英1.36.11
❤36
美化晚点更新 很久没更新了,后面会把皮肤秒刷新,枪械秒刷新,淘汰播报,主播LOGO,还有一些零零散散的美化都加上
👏19❤7
康娜和平精英配置美化2.4 更新内容: 1.适配和平精英1.35.12 暂时没别的更新了
🍌39❤14👏3
和平美化好像忘记了
🤩41❤11😁5
和平英精体验服最新物品数据分享 里面有下个版本要更新的东西,自己看
❤11🥰4
免费秒刷新在测试稳定性,你们也不想玩个美化搭上自己的账号吧,还有就是美化的源码也得重构一下,争取这几天搞完
👍40❤4🔥3
最近准备回归更新美化了 目前已经修复全局美化透明人,依旧肥肠好用
❤32👍3
瓦美化不更新了,这游戏我也没怎么玩
😭49🤯6❤5👍5🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @KNMHNB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,229,324 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“康娜主频道” (@KNMHNB), 15,656 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KNMHNB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.