Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 昆明茶话会黑车榜

Channel

昆明茶话会黑车榜

@KMjfhcb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

34subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 27 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004344070382
TypeChannel
Username@KMjfhcb
Description昆明街坊茶话会总群: @ccnzd
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 28 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 September 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/KMjfhcb

Growth

3427 Sept 2026, 06:48 — 34 subscribers27 Sept 2026, 07:22 — 34 subscribers27 Sept 2026, 06:4827 Sept 2026, 07:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–35 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 07:2234no change
27 Sept 2026, 06:4834first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 28 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
874.4%
avg views ÷ 34 subscribers
Avg views / post
297
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026
Posts held10 (28 August 2026 – 16 September 2026)
Views total2,081
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC289 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

群里老师注意下,这个支付宝,偷小溪15000的,最后一个字是峰

16 Sept 2026, 09:56 UTC301 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

逼养的,偷了小溪15000现金,把小溪6000块钱洛丽塔扯坏了然后射上面,老师报不报警还不确定

15 Sept 2026, 02:44 UTC342 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

经多位狼友反馈,人照等等各种不符合。现在将欣儿 @kunmingger 做出下榜处理,不在录用

13 Sept 2026, 13:57 UTC303 views0 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

这种不靠谱的老师别来群里上榜, 自己进来群里上榜,答应了工兵半价,工兵也跟他约好了时间,快到时间了,然后来说明天要走了不做了,这种老师群里永久拉黑, @yuanyuanaoe

10 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC260 viewsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @knumingmyPhoto

冒充520的骗子,没有用户名,写个个人简介假装用户名,大家不要再上当了,真520不可能去私信其他人

5 Sept 2026, 13:40 UTC264 viewsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @knumingmyPhoto

ID:773110376 @cc64948 这个人应该是惯犯了,这个就是昨天约溜溜老师课偷钱那个穷人,各位老师搜索一下复制用户名将这个穷逼拉黑吧,与免自己辛苦得来的毛爷爷被偷,这个穷逼已经从我们群里退出去,望各位老师注意安全,保护好自己的人身财产!

1 Sept 2026, 23:25 UTC322 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

昨天用这号冒领小新中奖吴哥窟那个穷逼,你连七百都没得,你出来玩尼玛,穷逼狗

28 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC327 views0 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

此老师不是本群榜上的老师,也不知道是哪里的野榜,在本群偷榜上老师的车评,改成自己的。大家约课时请注意看是否在榜

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @KMjfhcb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“昆明茶话会黑车榜” (@KMjfhcb), 34 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KMjfhcb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.