Channel
@KKBG8
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,198subscribers
+317 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003311851310 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KKBG8 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 28 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KKBG8 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 3,198 | +180 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 3,018 | +49 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 2,969 | +88 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 2,881 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3 (31 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 345 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
📣新增骗子一枚‼️ ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ 骗子昵称：77pay 印度通道 骗子用户名：@Good77pay @xiaoxiaobbu 骗子ID：6630735131 6533535303 🚫 骗子地址：TQuUHH62aSLqgchoFeChVR56nRxns87uJ1 💸 交易金额：6000u 📝 被骗说明：8月2日，我方有多笔大额代付会员订单迟迟未收到款项。发现问题后，我们第一时间联系对方处理，但对方始终以各种理由推脱，一直未能给出明确解决方案，也没有对未到账资金进行妥善处理。 由于担心资金安全，我们提出将账户余额下发为U（USDT），但对方以各种理由拒绝，甚至提出必须继续跑满2万U流水才可以下发余额，这一要求我们认为并不合理。 随后，我们按照正常流程继续提交代付订单，希望完成此前的业务。然而，对方却直接关闭了我们的代付通道，并告知"代付维护中"。 据我们了解，同一代付通道在其他盘口仍可正常进行代付业务，并…
📣新增骗子一枚‼️ ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ 骗子昵称：行者无疆 霖渊 陈霖渊 ✏️ 骗子用户名： @linyuan588 @linyuan3611 @chen1581688 骗子ID: 8102638389 8725166019 6703939981 🚫 骗子地址：TAnfmJKPR5hVn9ZtXUdHYEBYJQKK6VqwFA 💸 交易金额：2130u 📝 被骗说明：从6月25号一直拖着现在，天天跟我装着是中介，说那边不给结款，一直都是他在放量，现在用的飞机都是我这边给的，到现在不回信息，这个天天杀熟，一开始都是好好的到后面就不结款了，注意这三个都是同一个人 🙋 举报人用户名：@yy102599 担保交易认准：😍😍😍 ⚠️ 请注意防范，避免上当受骗！ 遇到骗子点我 ✉️ @KKCHZZZ 提交举报！
📣新增骗子一枚‼️ ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ 骗子昵称：嘻嘻那个模样 ✏️ 骗子用户名：@dbibjdbpd7793 🚫 骗子地址： 💸 交易金额：460.00USD 📝 被骗说明：给他打完孟加拉的粉，之后一直装死不回复，偶尔回复敷衍一下就失踪了，各种理由不结算，请大家注意这个跑路狗。（我一曝光马上改名字改id，改名前叫：發财（工作号）付款请语音确认，ID：@fc10668） 🙋 举报人用户名：@sky167788 担保交易认准：😍😍😍 ⚠️ 请注意防范，避免上当受骗！ 遇到骗子点我 ✉️ @KKCHZZZ 提交举报！
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @KKBG8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 823,145 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KK出海 【骗子曝光】‼️” (@KKBG8), 3,198 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KKBG8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.