New ath for $ITMT. https://www.tradingview.com/x/Q5t1oZuw/

Channel
Killua Zoldyck Cross Chain Calls⚡️⚡️
@KILLUAZOLDYCKCALLS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,342subscribers
-37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001370027448 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KILLUAZOLDYCKCALLS |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KILLUAZOLDYCKCALLS |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 1,342 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 1,348 | -18 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:10 | 1,366 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 1,379 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 1,379 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Just a deepseek guy Buy! 🐳🐳🐳🐳🐳🐳🐳🐳🐳🐳🐳🐳🐳🐳 🔀 0.2974 SOL ($68.75) 🔀 44,103.27 DEEPGUY 👤 amaterasu.sol | Txn ⬆️ New Holder! 💸 Market Cap $1,556,000 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events 🟣 | SOL TRENDING #6
New ATH. https://www.tradingview.com/x/m0LSEsgl/
$DEEPGUY I grabbed a small bag of $DEEPGUY. Liked the hype and momentum so far. #DYOR, NFA Chart: https://t.me/Justadeepguysol Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/e4znvy1vcygcu45zoxdnyuovzvww3h3kmzk5lvkpp6fd
FAFO Buy! 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 🔀 Spent $6,254.95 (26.319 SOL) 🔀 Got 74,642 FAFO 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 New Holder 💸 Market Cap $83,799,576 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending 🥇 #1 On SOL Trending 🔥
IN THE MEME TIME - ITMT Grabbed a bag of this bullish meme play backed by a team with a strong track record from the last bull run. This one’s got serious utility, with the TikTok trading concept standing out as a game-changer. Key features include a TikTok Privacy Swap supporting multi-EVM with no KYC, sweep giveaways offering prizes up to $5K through puzzle-solving on X, an $ITMT TG bot, and a Tap-2-Earn mobile ga…
FAFO Buy! 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 🔀 Spent $8,281.81 (33.362 SOL) 🔀 Got 348,778 FAFO 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 Position +51% 💸 Market Cap $23,745,217 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending ⏺ #8 On SOL Trending 🔥
$FAFO has reached 20M and there’s still no sign of a downturn. We’re printing 💪🏿 https://t.me/FAFOCOIN_PORTAL
$FAFO - FOMO CALL $FAFO has just been launched and is catching some quick hype. I’ve picked up a bit to see how far it can go. Let’s watch this play out and see where it heads! https://dexscreener.com/solana/adpoe7coikkvvnwg3tftkxhx3nvwiwtgz7zz8rmm2cvd
Neiro - UPDATE $NEIRO is currently in a phase of sideways consolidation, with the trend remaining neutral. A rise in volume or a strong breakout could signal a shift in direction. Keeping a close eye on the chart is crucial. #DYOR,NFA https://www.tradingview.com/x/u9eCmLA7/ https://t.me/neiro_portal https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xc555d55279023e732ccd32d812114caf5838fd46
SPX6900 Buy! 💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹💹 🔀 Spent $17,482.54 (5.292 ETH)
$MURAD - UPDATE $MURAD has reached an all-time high of $40M, marking a solid 10x for us. The team remains anonymous, adding a layer of mystery to the project, which could pave the way for even greater potential ahead. https://www.tradingview.com/x/6RsejOfq/ https://t.me/MuradCalls https://dexscreener.com/solana/6cq3amnb9pli4rkvpqegza9lwt5xevup8hnb5if8ggtp
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KILLUAZOLDYCKCALLS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,287,282 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@SPX6900Portal · 18,3783 posts$DEEPGUY portal
@Justadeepguysol · 4732 posts$NEIRO
@neiro_portal · 2772 posts@SOLTRENDING | Official
@SOLTRENDING · 435,7252 posts@TRENDING (ETH / SOL)
@trending · 493,3892 postsFAFO PORTAL
@FAFOCOIN_PORTAL · 2,0191 postOffical Trump 2.0 Portal and Announcments
@gettrumpmemes20 · 6971 postMuradCalls
@MuradCalls · 51 postPINKSALE TRENDING
@pinksaletrending_protectify · 6571 postSOL TRENDING
@trendingssol · 144,2281 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@KILLUAZOLDYCKCALLS named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Killua Zoldyck Cross Chain Calls⚡️⚡️” (@KILLUAZOLDYCKCALLS), 1,342 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KILLUAZOLDYCKCALLS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.