Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KICKSPAPER

Channel

KICKSPAPER

@KICKSPAPER

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,209subscribers

-298 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001495408776
TypeChannel
Username@KICKSPAPER
Descriptionгазета о кроссовках и сникер-культуре. главный редактор - @buddhachieff . Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3LuU9F
Created24 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/KICKSPAPER

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,20915,50715,3586 August 2026 — 15,507 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,506 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,498 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,492 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,488 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,483 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,480 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,473 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,480 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,473 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,468 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,464 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,456 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,460 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,451 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,477 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,465 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,468 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,478 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,480 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,483 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,471 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,460 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,446 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,440 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,426 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,417 subscribers7 September 2026 — 15,401 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,398 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,390 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,376 subscribers18 September 2026 — 15,367 subscribers2 October 2026 — 15,332 subscribers6 October 2026 — 15,308 subscribers11 October 2026 — 15,292 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,288 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,280 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,279 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,284 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,286 subscribers21 October 2026 — 15,285 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,286 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,285 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,286 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,285 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,279 subscribers28 October 2026 — 15,278 subscribers29 October 2026 — 15,274 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,258 subscribers2 November 2026 — 15,253 subscribers3 November 2026 — 15,244 subscribers4 November 2026 — 15,231 subscribers5 November 2026 — 15,232 subscribers6 November 2026 — 15,227 subscribers7 November 2026 — 15,222 subscribers9 November 2026 — 15,211 subscribers10 November 2026 — 15,209 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 96 days, net -298. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,164–15,552 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 20:5915,209-2
9 Nov 2026, 06:0715,211-11
7 Nov 2026, 21:1515,222-5
6 Nov 2026, 16:0915,227-5
5 Nov 2026, 17:3015,232+1
4 Nov 2026, 20:2715,231-13
3 Nov 2026, 19:5715,244-9
2 Nov 2026, 21:5115,253-5
30 Oct 2026, 20:0715,258-16
29 Oct 2026, 23:3515,274-4
28 Oct 2026, 20:1015,278-1
27 Oct 2026, 18:0115,279-6
26 Oct 2026, 15:3615,285-1
24 Oct 2026, 11:3015,286+1
23 Oct 2026, 09:3815,285-1
22 Oct 2026, 09:1015,286+1
21 Oct 2026, 04:3015,285-1
19 Oct 2026, 05:2715,286+2
18 Oct 2026, 04:5615,284+5
17 Oct 2026, 03:5115,279first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 15,209 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 68 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held68 (29 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total36,767
Reactions total510
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 06:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈13,300
Videos
≈752
Links
≈2,870

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
35s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,050 reactions across 63 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,08052.7%
🔥33916.5%
🤮25812.6%
custom 53525520328530409781788.68%
🤔994.83%
😁743.61%
👎200.976%
🤝20.098%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,050 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 67 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KICKSPAPER. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 68 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTC917 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @NiceDunksPhoto

Внимание! Конкурс! Великолепные призы: • 10 000₽ депозита в @NiceDunks и @NiceDunksOrder • Часы IKEA x OFF-White • Кардхолдер Nike Элементарные условия: 1. Подписка на @NiceDunks 2. Подписка на @NiceDunksOrder 3. Нажать кнопку «участвовать» Результаты автоматически опубликуются 21.11 в 20:00. Включайте уведомления, чтобы не пропускать 🔔

🤔16👎9🤮6

9 Nov 2026, 14:53 UTC≈1,190 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🏃 После вирального успеха лонгсливов с повышенным "эйрфлоу" подразделение Nike ACG решили использовать данное плетение и на кроссовоках. Скорее всего данные "Radical AirFlow" Pegasus Plus и ACG Pegasus Trail выйдут ближе к лету 2027 года. Radical AirFlow — это трикотажная ткань со встроенными воздуховодами, которые улавливают, ускоряют и направляют поток воздуха к коже, чтобы усилить испарение пота и обеспечить спор…

❤7

8 Nov 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,890 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🛒 DROPP DAYS! Я уже рассказывал вам про приложение Dropp Market, где есть выгодные предложения на сотни брендов (Nike, Carhartt, C.P. Company, Stone Island) с зарубежных бутиков. Сейчас там проходит месяц скидок до 80%, а до 9 ноября - бесплатная доставка на первую покупку. Сам собрал подборку, проверяйте размеры. Уже можно поискать новогодние подарки себе и близким ❤️. 💙 Подборка тут.

❤12🤮6👎3

8 Nov 2026, 07:58 UTC≈1,470 views30 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

👟 Забавно наблюдать, как вернулся ажиотаж вокруг архивных релизов adidas x Jeremy Scott. Моим удивлением стало то, что это подхватили молодые модники на Ⓜ️Китай-Городе. Своими глазами это наблюдал много раз. Началось всё это примерно год назад, но сейчас активно разгоняется. Даже в Сеуле 🇰🇷 видел хайпбистов, гоняющих в кроссовках с крыльями. Сотрудничество Джереми с тремя полосками было долгим, это было эпохой (мас…

🤮14❤10😁6

7 Nov 2026, 11:55 UTC≈2,380 views30 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🏃95-ые по 200 долларов. В далёком 2001 году Nike выпустили "Lux Pack", особенностью его была бирочка Made in Italy. Премиум материалы, ручная работа, лимитированное издание - поэтому на старте продаж они стоили 500 долларов (вроде бы, если я не ошибаюсь). Люксовых силуэтов было достаточно (и форсы, и трейнеры). В 2019 году эту историю взял себе Supreme. Аналогичный дизайн, новые цвета и тот же ценник в 500 долларо…

❤24custom 53525520328530409786

6 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC≈2,460 views39 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

🏃 А такие Nike Air Force 1 x Travis Scott x GTA простые смертные не получат. Огромный свуш смотрится ужасно, но сочетания цветов и материалов - забавно. Чем ближе релиз игры, тем больше шума. Ждём! P.S: Трэвис говорит, что эти пары получат только тру фэны. Скидывайте ему фото своих татуировок, коллекций кроссовок и т д.

🤮29custom 53525520328530409788🤔2

5 Nov 2026, 06:19 UTC≈2,550 views62 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🏃Анонс релизов на 2027 год от Nike. P.S: 90-ые в стиле топсайдеров вызывают много вопросиков.

🤮42❤18🔥2

4 Nov 2026, 16:23 UTC≈1,870 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026

📁 короче, смотрите что сделал для Jubilee.

custom 53525520328530409783❤1🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,890 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Там у Хлебного Универмага много новостей. Подсвечиваем важное: - обувь Lode (локал бренд, за которым уже давно слежу и вам рекомендую); - зимняя коллекция от Called A Garment (Нижегородский бренд, который явно вырос за последние годы); - у Кузьмы (владелец универмага) есть собственный бренд; - да и в целом там много нового, можно всё примерить оффлайн на Хлебозаводе. 📍Универмаг Хлебный (Новодмитровская, 1с1).

❤10

4 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC≈2,510 views41 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

👴 Появились детальные фотографии New Balance 990v7. Релиз запланирован на 6 ноября - надо заказывать.

❤27🤮9custom 53525520328530409785

3 Nov 2026, 16:26 UTC≈1,680 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🪡 Ранее мы выкладывали подборку работ Sashiko Gals, но теперь под их горячую руку попал один из граалей эпохи. Специально для Сары Андельман (founder Colette) был создан данный кастом на основе Air Jordan 1 Retro High x Colette (F&F). Эти кроссовки всегда стоили сумасшедших денег, и даже сейчас когда хайп на "единички" упал - их не достать за дёшево. Пара сильно преобразилась, выкрутили сашико на максимум. История м…

❤8🤔2custom 53525520328530409781

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @KICKSPAPER. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BondarenkoKirill
@bondarenkokirilll · 42,435
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 28 August 2026
LOOKFINDER
@lookfinder · 52,602
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
Ö News
@omanko_news · 46,794
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
НА ШУМЕ
@nashume · 20,090
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KICKSPAPER” (@KICKSPAPER), 15,209 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KICKSPAPER.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.