Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

KICKSPAPER

@KICKSPAPER

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,480subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001495408776
TypeChannel
Username@KICKSPAPER
Descriptionгазета о кроссовках и сникер-культуре. главный редактор - @buddhachieff . Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3LuU9F
Created24 November 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KICKSPAPER

Growth

15,48015,50715,493.56 August 2026 — 15,507 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,506 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,498 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,492 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,488 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,483 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,480 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,476–15,511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:1515,480-3
11 Aug 2026, 13:3315,483-5
10 Aug 2026, 10:2815,488-4
9 Aug 2026, 12:5115,492-6
8 Aug 2026, 14:0715,498-8
6 Aug 2026, 16:3015,506-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:2215,507first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 15,480 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,160
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total43,196
Reactions total524
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
13,000
Videos
738
Links
2,840

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

524 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30458.0%
🔥12123.1%
custom 53525520328530409785610.7%
🤔264.96%
🤮101.91%
😁40.763%
👎30.573%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 524reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KICKSPAPER. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC946 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🏃Набор LEGO® x Nike Air Force 1 будет красиво смотреться на полке у каждого из вас. Готовьте 100 долларов за 1093 детали. Старт продаж 1 сентября.

17🔥8👎3

12 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,450 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

14🔥3custom 53525520328530409781

11 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC≈1,730 views21 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026

❗️Не влезла в ролик одна история про фабрики в Китае. Считаю, что они тоже причастны к таким «приколам» в наших краях. Когда русский бренд приходит на популярную фабрику и говорит, что хочет свои кроссовки, ему сразу рисуют цены. Обычно, если вы хотите реально что-то своё (без копирования), то это будет дорого и долго. Но на фабрике работают не глупые люди и сразу предлагают уже готовые силуэты популярных брендов,

custom 5352552032853040978174

11 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC≈1,730 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

📹 наконец-то смонтировал этот видос. чую, что там будут горячие комментарии.

27🔥4custom 53525520328530409781

9 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈1,970 views37 reactionsread 13 August 2026

✉️ А ещё я всегда удивлялся, почему БШ не вписываются в тусовки, активации, необычные взаимодействия с аудиторией?! А им это просто не надо, как и не нужны все трендовые блогеры и ивенты. ❗️Пока почти все сникершопы притягивали к себе подростков и молодежь, Brandshop просто работал с аудиторией постарше и побогаче (что тоже очень важно). Именно такая аудитория и не особо заметила кризис, им и не надо что-то заказыва

32🤔3custom 53525520328530409782

9 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈1,850 viewsread 13 August 2026

💟встречаемся с вами через пару часов!

9 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC≈2,010 views57 reactionsread 13 August 2026

✉️ #поговорим@KICKSPAPER Понимаю, кто к Brandshop все относятся по разному, у каждого свои причины не любить БШ. Но... Вчера, гуляя по Москве, решил забежать и посмотреть, что у них по ассортименту и по наличию покупателей в магазине. И честно, был удивлён, вот даже без шуток. Захотелось написать об этом. 1. Ассортимент кроссовок - огромный, причем по всем брендам. Даже свежие переиздания силуэтов Nike уже в наличи

43🔥11custom 53525520328530409783

8 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC≈2,130 views30 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

16🤮10🤔4

7 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,990 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @juv_festPhoto

Самые азартные 60 минут фестиваля - аукционы с Сергеем Kickspaper😈 Пока кто-то ходит за кофе, другие уносят Stone Island за смешные деньги! Оригинальные лоты, старт на все позиции - 100 рублей! А дальше играем по правилам классического аукциона! ⏰ 17:00 📆 9 августа 📍Дизайн Завод Москва, Большая Новодмитровская улица, 36с2

6custom 53525520328530409783🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC≈2,040 views44 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

что на ногах, работяги? 🧑‍🏭

🔥29custom 535255203285304097887

6 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈2,040 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

+2 🏃 смотреть видео тут.

10🤔3custom 53525520328530409783

6 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈2,230 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🏔 Две расцветки Kith x Salomon XT-EVO стали частью грядущей коллекции Kith's &Kin Fall 2026. Старт продаж запланирован на 7 августа. В этот раз основой коллаборации стал силуэт XT-EVO, интересной деталью которого является контурная резиновая накладка на носу. Фактически это несколько обновлённые XT-6. В глаза бросается несколько смещённая шнуровка, но здесь она смотрится даже неплохо. ❗️P.S: если обычные XT-6 порой

🔥155custom 53525520328530409781

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KICKSPAPER. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 178,170 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KICKSPAPER” (@KICKSPAPER), 15,480 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KICKSPAPER.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.