13 measurements spanning 13 days, net +213. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,146–17,432 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 12:46
17,399
+183
28 Aug 2026, 11:27
17,216
+30
27 Aug 2026, 13:13
17,186
+1
26 Aug 2026, 15:24
17,185
+6
25 Aug 2026, 14:53
17,179
-2
24 Aug 2026, 16:05
17,181
-3
22 Aug 2026, 21:56
17,184
-2
21 Aug 2026, 13:57
17,186
+2
20 Aug 2026, 12:03
17,184
-5
19 Aug 2026, 10:08
17,189
+2
18 Aug 2026, 11:24
17,187
+2
17 Aug 2026, 10:03
17,185
-1
16 Aug 2026, 09:01
17,186
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 17,399 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,760
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.909%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
20 (19 March 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
1,760
Reactions total
16
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
302
Videos
21
Links
283
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
563 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
485
86.1%
👏
20
3.55%
🔥
18
3.20%
👍
15
2.66%
❤🔥
11
1.95%
🥰
9
1.60%
🤯
2
0.355%
👌
1
0.178%
🤗
1
0.178%
🫡
1
0.178%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 563reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
random notes 70
1- لو حد جاي ب weakness مش متفسر ، بعد ما تعمل تحاليلك والدنيا مش متفسره ، بنعمل رسم عضلات "EMG" و
muscle biobsy.
2- لو عيان شخصته
1ry cushing
لازم برضه استبعاد
pheochromocytoma
عشان ليها بروتوكول معين لعلاج الضغط قبل ما تدخل عمليه تشيل الsuprarenal
mass
3- tendon xanthomata
لو لقيناها مع
normal lipid profile
فكر في malignancy
4- التوتر اثناء سحب عينه prolactin لوحده يرفع s.prolactin level
لان c…
🧧🧧حته مهمه شبابنا
معظم عيانين diabetic kidney disease هيكون معاهم
albuminuria
لكن فيه نسبه بيكون
non-albuminuric diabetic kidney disease { <20% }
طب امته لما الاقي مريض سكر و CKD ومفيش معاه بروتين ف البول
ادور على سبب تاني للCKd غير السكر؟
لو معاك حاجه من دول دور ع سبب تاني غير السكر..
- Diabetes duration <5 years (especially Type 1 diabetes)
- No diabetic complications in a patient with advanced CKD
-Rapid fall in …
random notes 69
1- امته اقيم الeGFR اعتمادا على ليفيل
cystatin c
وليس creatinine ؟
~cachexia
~sarcopenic obesity
~اللي بيروحوا الجيم وياخدوا مكملات
لان ديه حاجات هتعمل false normal eGFR لو اعتمدت ع creat.
2- anterior MI
مضاعفته غالبا heart failure
و INFERIOR MI
بيعمل heart block اكتر.
3-ايه الفرق بين carotid message
لو عملناه ل SVT ولو عملناه ل flutter
SVT: gradual reduction of HR
flutter : algebric manner,
يعني r…
random notes 68
1-absent p wave could be hyperkalemia especially if bradycardia , high s.k level
2- only anti epileptic to cause wt loss is topiramate
3- malabsorption
بتزود تكوين urine oxalate stones
عشان ca بينزل مش بيمتص، بينما oxalate بينفصل عنه وينزل ف البول
4- من ضمن اسباب
الacute pancreatitis
هي hypercalcemia، لو عيان كده
بس ممكن اول ما تقيس الca ف الacute pancreatitis يطلع كويس اول كذا يوم !! لان ca dep…
random notes 67
1- ازاي مريض سكر بيقلك انا يا دكتور مباكلش نقطه كاربوهيدرات{وده تصرف غلط} ومع ذلك سكري بيعلي ؟
اولا ده فعل غلط احنا بنقلل السكريات مش بنمنعها ،ثانيا البروتين مثلا ممكن يتحول ل جلوكوز ف الاخر عادي gluconeogenesis
ثالثا الكبد بيفك الجليكوجين ل جلوكوز برضه وعادي
٢- ايه علاج hydatid cyst تفتكر يعني ادويه ولا aspiration ولا جراحه ؟ جراحه
٣- اشهر extraintestinal manifestation لل IBD
◇crohns: gall stones…
https://t.me/drahmedabdelsadek
لو حد حابب ده لينك join قناة عمي
أ.د أحمد عبد الصادق
استاذ امراض الصدر بطب بنها
هيشرح chest medicine كله باذن الله على مدار الفتره القادمه
random notes 66
1- لو مريض سكر هيسوق عربيه مسافه طويله، يخلي معاه حاجه مسكره ،وقيس سكر قبل الرحله ثم كل ساعتان , تفاصيل
2- لو مريض سكر داخل عمليه، لو elective يفضل يكون السكر التراكمي اقل من ٨.٥ ، أمان
٣- لو عيان Hypothyroidism، اتابع tsh كل قد ايه ؟
~لو حامل : تعمله كل شهر لحد لما تبقا targeted ثم كل شهران.
~لو مش حامل : تعمله كل شهران ولما تبقا targeted تعمله كل ٦ شهور
٤- لو حامل عندها السكر توقع hypoglycem…
❤23❤🔥10👍2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KA_MEDICAL_NOTES. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 397,762 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ahmed pharmacy (OTC) @OTCcourse · 61,916 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
Doctor Hypo @doctorhypo · 98,016 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
سافر (Suffer) يا دكتور @Suffer_ya_doctor · 134,395 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KA Medical Notes ✨” (@KA_MEDICAL_NOTES), 17,399 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KA_MEDICAL_NOTES.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.