Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 26 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,652–1,694 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 00:21
1,657
-6
14 Sept 2026, 03:17
1,663
-5
10 Sept 2026, 05:58
1,668
-1
4 Sept 2026, 23:02
1,669
-6
31 Aug 2026, 20:07
1,675
-1
28 Aug 2026, 20:29
1,676
-9
25 Aug 2026, 21:04
1,685
-3
23 Aug 2026, 03:04
1,688
-1
22 Aug 2026, 15:01
1,689
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 23 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
808 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
545
67.5%
😭
64
7.92%
❤🔥
47
5.82%
😁
40
4.95%
🤔
18
2.23%
☃
13
1.61%
🤣
13
1.61%
🍓
12
1.49%
💋
11
1.36%
🔥
11
1.36%
💅
8
0.99%
💘
8
0.99%
🙈
6
0.743%
🗿
5
0.619%
👀
4
0.495%
🏆
1
0.124%
💊
1
0.124%
🥴
1
0.124%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 808 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2025 to 14 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Жизнь - сплошная психотравма, но это лечится. По крайней мере, так думают те, кто 14 октября в 14:00 в аудитории 227 будет проводить встречу на тему «Основы консультирования кризисных состояний и психотравм».
Да, наконец-то кто-то объяснит, как разговаривать с человеком, когда слова уже не работают.
В программе:
-как консультировать в кризисных ситуациях (спойлер: без паники);
-работа с психотравмой (а не с драмой,…
Уже не первый день университет гудит от разного рода слухов по поводу возможных изменений в формате взаимодействия студентов и преподавателей. Вариантов множество, но администрация вуза пока хранит молчание - поскольку, как известно "Желтой прессе", пока идёт ещё стадия обсуждения, корректировки и утверждения вероятных новшеств (в том, что они будут так или иначе приняты, никто не сомневается).
Правда, кажется, что …
В университете (да и в городе) стало слишком много респираторных заболеваний. Чтобы предупредить болезнь, медкабинет MNU предлагает пойти и уколоться вакциной от гриппа в 143 кабинете.
Без масок. Без фильтров. Без гарантий.
MNU - хитрые. За один день выполнили и поручение президента по цифровизации, и поручение по гендерному балансу во власти.
❤86😭10🤣8💘5🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @KAZGUUyellow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Самый важный вопрос. Как провести последний теплый вечер пятницы в этом году?
Бар! Если ақша бар18%
Лучше прогулок нет. С правого на левый, да 30 км!27%
У нас уже были первые контрольные. Так что в любом случае у психотерапевта16%
Какая разница, в какую погоду сидеть дома?21%
Не сыпьте соль на рану, у меня пары по субботам (((18%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2025 to 14 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Работа в Астане | Работа Астана Вакансии @astana_job_vakansii · 23,581 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 18 September 2026
Astanovka98 @astanovka98 · 59,348 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
TESTCENTERKZ @uto92 · 184,773 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Желтая пресса желтого дома” (@KAZGUUyellow), 1,657 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KAZGUUyellow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
