**•̩̩͙✩•̩̩͙*˚˚*•̩̩͙✩•̩̩͙*˚* ◈𝓐 𝓷𝓮𝔀 𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓷𝓮𝓵 ◈ ♡*♡∞:。.。。.。:∞♡*♡
Signed 𝑬𝒚𝒆𝒔 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒇𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒐𝒖𝒕.

Channel
@JournalistZlata
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002084934608 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JournalistZlata |
| Description | Привітик! Я журналістка Злата! Шукаю м'ю(Можете списати і по співпрацям та вз) Пишіть - @ImZlatk Хорошого дня! 💋💗 НЕ ПРИЙМАЮ УЧАСТІ В ЧИСТКАХ! |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JournalistZlata |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 11 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 11 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 19 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
59 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 11 | 18.6% | |
| 👻 | 8 | 13.6% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 11.9% | |
| 😘 | 7 | 11.9% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 10.2% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 10.2% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 😎 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 5.08% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2024 to 16 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
**•̩̩͙✩•̩̩͙*˚˚*•̩̩͙✩•̩̩͙*˚* ◈𝓐 𝓷𝓮𝔀 𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓷𝓮𝓵 ◈ ♡*♡∞:。.。。.。:∞♡*♡
Signed 𝑬𝒚𝒆𝒔 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒇𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒐𝒖𝒕.
➹➷➹➷➹➷𝑆𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑂𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑟 ➷➹➷➹➷➹ ⇨𝐽𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡⇦? ↝𝑆𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑒𝑙𝑠𝑒 ↜? 𝓘'𝓵𝓵 𝓫𝓮 𝓫𝓪𝓬𝓴, 𝓴𝓲𝓽𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓼 𝕬𝖗𝖊 𝖞𝖔𝖚 𝖗𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖞?
Signed 𝑬𝒚𝒆𝒔 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒇𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒐𝒖𝒕.
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «❗Пішла,тепер точно, вибачте,любі❗𝐼𝑡'𝑠 𝑚𝑒, 𝑗𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡 𝑍𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑎 ♡»
𝐒𝐨 𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐲, 𝐦𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐫 Вибачте, любі, та я вирішила піти з журналістики. Вона мені трохи набридла, в мене немає ідей, від слова ВЗАГАЛІ. Я довго думала... Можливо я ще вернусь та не дуже скоро це точно... Я була з вами майже рік та, надіюсь, що цей рік зі мною у вас пройшов прекрасно. В мене майже немає часу на себе. Я завжди думаю, що викласти сюди, завжди думаю про сам канал. Так як у мене буде 2 зміна, я мало тог…
💔7⚡1❤1👻1
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐧, 𝐬𝐨 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭? 𝘐'𝘮 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘡𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘢, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸?
Сьогодні, я хочу поговорити про ситуацію, з якої зіткнулася артистка Holo Music Джуді. Їй неодноразово надсилали анонімні повідомлення з образами та побажаннями смерті. Таке ставлення не лише до артистів, а взагалі до людей є неприпустимим. Якщо вас щось не влаштовує в компанії або артистах Holo Music, то досить псувати життя людям з колективу компанії. Якщо бажаєте розказати все, що думаєте про нас або в черговий ра…
🔥2🍓1👻1😘1🆒1
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐧, 𝐬𝐨 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭? 𝘐'𝘮 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘡𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘢, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸?
Зараз ми (@soulslabel) Влаштовуємо шоу на найкращій кавер! Трошки інформації як це буде проводитись: • Вам треба мати кавер на повну пісню, у форматі відео(бажано кліп самої пісні) • Цей кавер виставляємо на ютуб канал компанії • В кого набирається більше всього переглядів, вподобайок та коментарів! Той переміг отримає невеличкий подарунок ❤️ • З однієї компанії може бути лише два учасника! На реп та вокал *Правила…
🔥2👻1😘1
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐧, 𝐬𝐨 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭? 𝘐'𝘮 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘡𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘢, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸?
»»——⍟——«« New cover Song::Woke up Group::Xg Cover by::Tiksi »»——⍟——«« #МЕГАРЕПОСТ #РЕПОСТБУДЬЛАСКА
⚡1❤1🍓1👻1💋1🔥1😎1😘1
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐧, 𝐬𝐨 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭? 𝘐'𝘮 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘡𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘢, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸?
Чудова компанія @DoremuEnter шукає чудових людей ! Хто потрібен в стафф ? : Лого мейкери які будуть робити : іграшки,картки,лайстики Адмін по вз / сп Вчителі по вокалу,репу,танцях — потрібні! Хто потрібен з артистів ? : Трейні ( 3/30 ) — потрібні! Соло артисти ( 5/10 ) Танцівники ( 1/5 ) Дахьон,Міну,Чоньон ( Твайс ) Писати @Mmiayyyyyy , @Anixxps , @Sh01yhya #СУПЕРРЕПОСТ #МЕГАРЕПОСТ
⚡1👻1💋1🔥1😎1😘1🆒1
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐧, 𝐬𝐨 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭? 𝘐'𝘮 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘡𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘢, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸?
У нас жарко та плюс я ванабі вчила 💔
⚡1❤1👻1💋1💘1🔥1😎1😘1
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐧, 𝐬𝐨 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭? 𝘐'𝘮 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘡𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘢, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸?
Привітики, як ви? 💖 Як погода? 💋
⚡1❤1👻1💋1🔥1😎1😘1
Дивіться як я сфотографувала 😉
🔥3💋2⚡1👻1😘1
Signed 𝐑𝐚𝐧, 𝐬𝐨 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭? 𝘐'𝘮 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘡𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘢, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸?
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @JournalistZlata. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,142,179 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@JournalistZlata named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❗Пішла,тепер точно, вибачте,любі❗𝐼𝑡'𝑠 𝑚𝑒, 𝑗𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡 𝑍𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑎 ♡” (@JournalistZlata), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JournalistZlata.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.