Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Jordan Calls

@JordanCalls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,617subscribers

+1,436 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001774104090
TypeChannel
Username@JordanCalls
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JordanCalls

Growth

19,05420,61719,835.57 August 2026 — 19,181 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,181 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,128 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,054 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,802 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,781 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,716 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,617 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1,436. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,820–20,851 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:2520,617+901
12 Aug 2026, 03:0219,716-65
11 Aug 2026, 03:0119,781-21
10 Aug 2026, 05:2119,802+748
9 Aug 2026, 02:0119,054-74
7 Aug 2026, 23:0319,128-53
7 Aug 2026, 04:1519,181no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:0619,181first reading

Engagement

81 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.88%
avg views ÷ 20,617 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,830
81 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.569%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
81
of 81 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 79 of 81 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held81 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total148,371
Reactions total832
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

832 reactions across 79 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥20324.4%
💯15919.1%
👌11814.2%
🤩11213.5%
🏆8810.6%
526.25%
🌭516.13%
🐳495.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 832reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC≈1,660 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👌4🔥4🤩2💯1

12 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC≈1,670 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$HMM - 120x🔥🔥🔥🔥 from the 277K call, ath 33.2M chart just went full send 0x7FE995a80075dF3Dc8Ae11A9b82c7FE4202CD87f https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x2b0d0183d017c58b924401ca8ac362f6e01f0e9e

🏆8👌5🤩5🔥4

12 Aug 2026, 21:56 UTC≈1,300 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: Retirement Play! 🏝 @JordanCalls made a x100+ call on Thinking Cat. $251K ➡️ $25M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Catch plays like this early with SpyDefi Filters!

💯7🌭5🤩5👌3🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,990 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: x3! ☝️ @JordanCalls made a x3+ call on EL GATO. $247K ➡️ $757K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Auto-buy and sell calls like this through SpyDefi Filters!

🔥43🤩3👌2

12 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC≈2,130 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$GATO - 3x💹 and printing, ath 805K 0x3b7157B6409380E09A131b631dFb8dFD2781D9cc https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x54c4cce1f2ddd04dd0e7aac9310db74ad49c51f9cc998d38b4e56cdb80bfdb61

💯7🐳5👌5🤩2🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,860 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🏆3🐳3

12 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,860 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @moneymancalls1104

0x7C8d39b099BD464732ee3EbBa3eAD593Ee7D7777

🏆6

12 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,720 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @moneymancalls1104

One flork to rule them all. After tomorrow we will see flork more and more on the official binance accounts.

🌭3💯3🤩1

12 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,950 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: x2! ✌️ @JordanCalls made a x2+ call on EL GATO. $247K ➡️ $572K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Catch plays like this early with SpyDefi Filters!

🔥4🤩42🌭1💯1

12 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈2,080 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$GATO - 2x💹 from the call, ath 530K another leg up right after tapping ath 🔥 0x3b7157B6409380E09A131b631dFb8dFD2781D9cc https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x54c4cce1f2ddd04dd0e7aac9310db74ad49c51f9cc998d38b4e56cdb80bfdb61

12 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,730 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$FLORK - sitting at 204K, tapped 244K 0x7C8d39b099BD464732ee3EbBa3eAD593Ee7D7777 https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0x8b2020b4a3d400fcc1b472b564467a57df2a050e

3🐳1👌1💯1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @JordanCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 238,385 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jordan Calls” (@JordanCalls), 20,617 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JordanCalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.