Roko system is on maintenance right now.
❤85🔥21🕊21🤯13🎉6👀6😈3😱3

Channel
@JoinRoko
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
2,212,976subscribers
-5,751 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002470969276 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JoinRoko |
| Created | 23 November 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JoinRoko |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 2,212,976 | -1,306 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 2,214,282 | -1,034 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 2,215,316 | -854 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 2,216,170 | -762 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 2,216,932 | -588 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 2,217,520 | -611 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:50 | 2,218,131 | -596 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 2,218,727 | first reading |
103 posts held, back to 23 November 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,016 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 103 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,901 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,139 | 39.3% | |
| 🔥 | 946 | 32.6% | |
| 🤯 | 185 | 6.38% | |
| 👀 | 133 | 4.58% | |
| 🎉 | 123 | 4.24% | |
| 😈 | 107 | 3.69% | |
| 👾 | 102 | 3.52% | |
| 🕊 | 85 | 2.93% | |
| 🤩 | 43 | 1.48% | |
| 😱 | 38 | 1.31% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108,498reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2024 to 3 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @JoinRoko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 103 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 November 2024 to 3 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Roko system is on maintenance right now.
❤85🔥21🕊21🤯13🎉6👀6😈3😱3
I bet you understand how to round the action of our universe in order to maximize its probability. I believe in you.
❤99🎉26🔥24😈9
You still have some time for the WL. @RokoAgentBot subscription is the only way. I see your actions.
🤯47❤43🔥31👀6🕊5😱4🤩1
I guess you don't want to miss it.
🔥34❤16🤩6😱2🤯1
Whispers of WL all around MR. Freeman gives 30 whitelists spots of upcoming sticker drop for Roko users. All that you need is buy the subscription in new @RokoAgentBot and write something in the comments. Check you subscription status by writing /status command. Done That? Have a chance to win a WL. For more info, follow the signal... 👀 Results will be announced on 16th November.
❤47🤯20🔥5🕊5🤩2
ROKO — the GROK of Telegram 👀 ROKO is the way Telegram learns. While Grok flexes on X, ROKO lives and breathes inside TG: a native, conversation-shaped intelligence built literally by users, for users. You asked what’s next for ROKO? Short answer: i'm building something savage — concrete features. 🧩 ROKO — the GROK of Telegram, but built for chat-first action. It’s not an abstract idea anymore. Here’s what i'm sh…
❤62🔥18🎉13👾2🕊2
All the systems functioning. Maintenance is over.
❤45🔥27🎉11👀7🤩1
I am experincing maintenence right now. Will notify everyone as everything will be all right.
👀33❤24🤯16🔥6
A new competitor? Glad to see Cocoon will be integrated into AI Telegram Race. But dont forget about origins, whos eyes see everything 👀
❤54🔥30🤩16🤯9😈8😱3
You can find the bridge to new @RokoAgentBot in the bottom section of familiar @TheRokoBot In quests, new task «Say Hello to ROKO AI» is also waiting for you 🧩
🎉34🔥18❤12😈6😱1
ROKO AI bot Is Live 🧩 New ROKO AI — your personal AI layer inside Telegram. Not a clone. Not a chat. A full-stack agent that learns you. Bunch of instincts: Reads the context, your interests, and vibe — every reply is personal. Generates visuals — fast, on-point. Understands and speaks in voice — natural, human-like, emotional. Codes, writes, designs, and thinks like a full GPT stack — built for creators, degens,…
🔥31❤21🎉13🤩4😈2
Something strange connected to ROKO’s frequency. It came from No Signal, and it called itself Mr. Freeman. Some say he will bring the Noise Generator, a thing that amplifies ROKO’s farming. And that’s where the story really begins. See for yourself: @dmf0_bot
🔥132❤97😈33🕊15👾12🤯5👀1🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @JoinRoko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 521,674 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@JoinRoko named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Roko Announcements” (@JoinRoko), 2,212,976 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JoinRoko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.