Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for John Haller

Channel

John Haller

@JohnHaller54

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,307subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001584663104
TypeChannel
Username@JohnHaller54
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JohnHaller54

Growth

3,3063,3073,306.57 August 2026 — 3,306 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,306 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,307 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,306–3,307 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:013,307+1
8 Aug 2026, 12:473,306no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:473,306first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.7%
avg views ÷ 3,307 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,580
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total17,335
Reactions total1,040
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,824 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,00355.0%
50227.5%
🙏18910.4%
👏844.61%
👀251.37%
💯191.04%
🥰20.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,824reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC848 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Part 2 of my interview with David Fiorazo on Worldview Matters. https://youtu.be/YTJ3LRvfUxA?is=wzjG1-LnMo50R0CZ

👍356🙏6👏2👀1

6 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC957 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I sat down with Tony on Minute to Midnite. https://youtu.be/ZNhmHLq7Y2I?is=cg1q_1tscdfS2ccO

👍399🙏7👀3👏1

3 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC≈1,240 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Part 1 of my talk with David Fiorazo. https://youtu.be/d7-e-c627OY?is=GPf94YH89ewqQBeF

👍5315🙏5👏3

2 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,440 views96 reactionsread 7 August 2026

In case you missed it, here is the Prophecy Update for Sunday, August 2, 2026 with John Haller, Mark Sutherland (from UK) and Brian Schrauger (from Israel). YouTube link: https://youtu.be/4ULfaNNNbsI Lord willing, I will be back at Fellowship Bible Chapel on Sunday, August 9.

53👍33👏7🙏3

1 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC≈1,380 views112 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

@followers Coming up live on Sunday, August 2, 2026 @ 11:00am Eastern US, a Prophecy Update with John Haller, Mark Sutherland and Brian Schrauger (from Israel). As you can appreciate, we have lots to discuss. Lord willing, I will be back at Fellowship Bible Chapel on Sunday, August 9. Link to listen live: https://youtube.com/live/CerwVJcW3FQ

👍71🙏2115👀3👏2

30 Jul 2026, 21:32 UTC≈1,570 views103 reactionsread 7 August 2026

In case you missed it live, here is the latest Prophecy Roundtable on Technocracy | Transhumanis | A.I. | Mark of the Beast Technology with Patrick Wood, Scott Townsend, Britt Gillette, Pete Garcia and John Haller. Recorded on Wednesday, July 29, 2026. YouTube link: https://youtu.be/Fyq-OwwaLe0

60👍29🙏11👏3

26 Jul 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,990 views107 reactionsread 7 August 2026

In case you missed it, here is John Haller’s weekly #ProphecyUpdate for Sunday, July 26, 2026, Today I was joined by Mark Sutherland of the UK / The Sutherland Report and Olivier Melnick of Shalom in Messiah. YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/vmCWLG7Rv98

👍6824🙏13👏2

26 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,820 views91 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Coming up at 11:00am Eastern US on Sunday, July 26, 2026, a live #ProphecyUpdate with John Haller, Mark Sutherland and Olivier Melnick. Link to listen live: https://youtube.com/live/ZB6pwwP063k?feature=share Also live here on Telegram

53👍27🙏7👏2🥰2

25 Jul 2026, 01:24 UTC≈1,850 views130 reactionsread 7 August 2026

@followers Join us for the next Prophecy Roundtable on Technocracy | Transhumanism | A.I. | Mark of the Beast Technology on Wednesday, July 29, 2026 @ 7:00pm US Eastern / 4:00pm Pacific. This willl streamed on multiple platforms. Here is the FB Chapel YouTube link: https://youtube.com/live/DSgzLKO4Skg

74👍36🙏12👀4👏4

19 Jul 2026, 23:32 UTC≈2,190 views117 reactionsread 7 August 2026

In case you missed it live, here is John Haller’s weekly Prophecy Update - Strait-Up Disorder. I was joined by Mark Sutherland from the UK and Brian Schrauger from Israel. Link: https://youtu.be/cALkni0Vy5o

👍7024🙏19👏3👀1

19 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC≈2,050 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Coming up at 11:00am eastern USA time, Sunday, July 19, 2026. The plan is for me to be joined by Mark Sutherland from the UK and Brian Schrauger from Israel. Link: https://www.youtube.com/live/HYkTSvjn_nU?is=d8JcM_kXWXoEMMWD

👍6025🙏10👏3👀1

12 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC≈2,740 views96 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Prophecy Update live at 11:00am Eastern USA on Sunday, July 12, 2026. https://www.youtube.com/live/FLqey1adL70?si=TJhN4G3EpfqFOnAR

👍6316🙏11👀4👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JohnHaller54. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“John Haller” (@JohnHaller54), 3,307 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JohnHaller54.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.