Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐‰๐’๐‡-๐–๐ฒ๐œ๐ค๐จ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ ๐“๐ซ๐š๐๐ž๐ซ ๐ŸŽฏ๐Ÿณ

Channel

๐‰๐’๐‡-๐–๐ฒ๐œ๐ค๐จ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ ๐“๐ซ๐š๐๐ž๐ซ ๐ŸŽฏ๐Ÿณ

@Jofra_Stock_Hunter

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

6,807subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001154469316
TypeChannel
Username@Jofra_Stock_Hunter
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Jofra_Stock_Hunter

Growth

6,80713 Aug 2026, 14:16 โ€” 6,807 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 09:55 โ€” 6,807 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 14:1614 Aug 2026, 09:55
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 6,800โ€“6,814 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:556,807no change
13 Aug 2026, 14:166,807first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
13.7%
avg views รท 6,807 subscribers
Avg views / post
930
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 August 2026 โ€“ 13 August 2026)
Views total18,602
Reactions total161
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

161 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค11772.7%
๐Ÿ‘3924.2%
๐Ÿ™31.86%
๐Ÿ‘10.621%
๐Ÿคฉ10.621%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC517 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

IXIGO updated chart on hourly CMP 171 Stocks often revisit recent lows to test whether any remaining liquidity is left before making a meaningful move. Now we might get a bullish divergence near an important support Need a bounce from here ๐Ÿคž

โค15

13 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC543 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#AsianEnergy updated chart sustaining the BO results today ๐Ÿคž

13 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC724 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Defence sector might give BO soon

๐Ÿ‘6โค4

12 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC865 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐ˆ๐๐ƒ๐„๐๐„๐๐ƒ๐„๐๐‚๐„ ๐ƒ๐€๐˜ ๐Ž๐…๐…๐„๐‘๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ JSH Premium Membership with 15% Discount on all the plans!! (Offer valid till 15th August)๐Ÿณ You may join JSH Premium and get the following benefits ๐Ÿš€ Exclusive Trading Calls โ€“ Discover lesser-known stocks before they go big ๐Ÿš„ Train Picks โ€“ Base breakout stocks ready for momentum ๐Ÿ’ฃ BOMBs โ€“ high-potential BSE-listed stocks ๐Ÿ”ฐ Free Trading Book PDFs โ€“ Learn proven strategies ๐Ÿ“ˆ Chart-Based Stโ€ฆ

โค2

12 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC863 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Sharing next potential doubler with Premium members ๐Ÿณ https://t.me/Jofra_Stock_Hunter/5920

โค6

12 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC886 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://x.com/Niteish_14/status/2087410512737005607

โค4

11 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC990 views52 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

The reason I keep sharing the analysis of a particular stock multiple times is simple - its the conviction I have in that setup. I believe in it because I have seen the setup work well in the past, & I genuinely feel it has the potential to work again. This is one of those few groups jahan stocks niche jaane pe bhi updates milte hain. And honestly, akele paisa banane mein woh maza nahi hai. Also, I donโ€™t want anyโ€ฆ

โค43๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ™3๐Ÿ‘1

11 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTCโ‰ˆ1,030 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#yatra updated chart bounced perfectly from support next it needs to cross 116 ๐Ÿคž

โค5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Jofra_Stock_Hunter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Bullss
@bullss ยท 110,720
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here โ€” alongside 88 others โ€” read 14 August 2026
Money creates Money
@moneycreatesmoney ยท 131,025
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 92 here โ€” alongside 91 others โ€” read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐‰๐’๐‡-๐–๐ฒ๐œ๐ค๐จ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ ๐“๐ซ๐š๐๐ž๐ซ ๐ŸŽฏ๐Ÿณโ€ (@Jofra_Stock_Hunter), 6,807 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jofra_Stock_Hunter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.