Are we ready to hold $HOLD again 👀
🔥21💯5❤4🥱4

Channel
@Joe420Call
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
17,158subscribers
+3,946 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001492372429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Joe420Call |
| Description | Owned by @Joegrower420_eth No paid calls, NFA 🌱 Anything airdropped to me will be stated as so, everything else is aped by me 🐐 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Joe420Call |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 03:08 | 17,158 | -182 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 01:21 | 17,340 | -120 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 15:10 | 17,460 | -95 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:24 | 17,555 | -124 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:59 | 17,679 | -68 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:06 | 17,747 | -28 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:47 | 17,775 | -41 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:41 | 17,816 | -1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:05 | 17,817 | -82 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:26 | 17,899 | +891 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 17,008 | -155 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 17,163 | -189 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:30 | 17,352 | -94 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 17,446 | -144 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:30 | 17,590 | +589 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 17,001 | -166 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:09 | 17,167 | -114 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 17,281 | -223 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:30 | 17,504 | -103 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:26 | 17,607 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 8 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
686 reactions across 27 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 302 | 44.0% | |
| 🔥 | 158 | 23.0% | |
| 👏 | 30 | 4.37% | |
| 🕊 | 29 | 4.23% | |
| 👀 | 25 | 3.64% | |
| 😁 | 25 | 3.64% | |
| 🌭 | 18 | 2.62% | |
| 🎉 | 15 | 2.19% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 2.19% | |
| 😭 | 14 | 2.04% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 1.75% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 1.31% | |
| 🏆 | 8 | 1.17% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 1.02% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.729% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 0.583% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.437% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 0.437% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.292% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.292% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 686 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Are we ready to hold $HOLD again 👀
🔥21💯5❤4🥱4
Old friend of mine reached out to me about malfoid; not gonna lie this is a very good narrative still sitting below 1m is a joke. I believe this will do way more with those tweets getting a whole lot of attention. was dropped some supply, also bought more myself and will keep buying as we go higher 🌱 Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/6wXTJaLNN3GCUJajJ9Vj2te51zsNgPVXV37EbFGRAjLz Twitter: https://x.com/Malfoid_CT…
❤5👏3🔥2
$HOLD grinding up 🌱
🔥22❤9😁6🤯2
Great day to buy some $SPX (the thickest ticker of them all)
❤45🕊14💯7👀5😁2
Chatted with the dev of $NLYRA for a while and was impressed with what he’s cooked up so far’, Look at all the utilities they have across the ecosystem. They even have their own version of Tornado Cash and Desk, where users can trade, as well as their own trading bots. Ngl this is the most bullish play on Robinhood Chain. 🌱 For transparency as always I was dropped some supply, although I scooped a bit myself and wil…
❤23⚡7🔥6👏3
$HOLD also searching for a breakout point 👀🌱
❤13🔥8👏3
Quietly reached a new ath 🌱 10x would have stick around a while longer but the eagle has landed and it's time to go smoke some cali weed 😤💨
🔥17
Voice message, posted without a caption
🔥8😁7❤5
$SERIOUSCAT over 8x already and looking to do more 🪽
🔥8🕊4
Got dropped some $SERIOUSCAT, good name and cool ticker + good entry here. Fresh launch so risky but will add more info as I find it 🌱 TG: https://t.me/seriouscatrh Dex: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x196A3Ab28E1e854a040e57576cf94ff99d7F3Acc Website: https://seriouscat.space/ This gets a rating of a 0.5 for now until it's survived a bit
🔥9❤7
What a final DCA SPX6900
❤11😭6👍5👀3🤩3
WHO WINS THE WORLD CUP?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👀4
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @Joe420Call. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
WHO WINS THE WORLD CUP?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2026 to 12 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Joe 420 Calls” (@Joe420Call), 17,158 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Joe420Call.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.