Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for JIZZAXJON🇺🇿

Channel

JIZZAXJON🇺🇿

@Jizzaxjonuz

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,337subscribers

-1,424 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002106943823
TypeChannel
Username@Jizzaxjonuz
DescriptionJizzax haqida barcha yangiliklar. ☎️Reklama va murojaat uchun @Jizzaxjon_admin
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Jizzaxjonuz

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Chaqmoq/3974726 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC@Jizzaxjonuz/25343 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC0.9724 minutes
@Chaqmoq/3973826 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC@Jizzaxjonuz/25341 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC0.9546 minutes
@Chaqmoq/3963024 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC@Jizzaxjonuz/25299 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC0.9324 minutes
@Chaqmoq/3964024 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC@Jizzaxjonuz/25303 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC0.937 minutes
@Chaqmoq/3965224 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC@Jizzaxjonuz/25306 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC0.9333 minutes
@Jizzaxjonuz/25300 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC@Chaqmoq/3964324 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC0.923.6 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Chaqmoq9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9337 minutes@Chaqmoq (7–2)
@infouz6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9073 minutes@infouz (4–2)
@UnchaMuncha5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9335 minutes@UnchaMuncha (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 16 of the 16 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 266 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,3378,7618,0497 August 2026 — 8,761 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,761 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,725 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,649 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,580 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,465 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,411 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,354 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,290 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,260 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,222 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,160 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,074 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,939 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,859 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,715 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,673 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,581 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,526 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,476 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,453 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,434 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,410 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,411 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,391 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,373 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,358 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,337 subscribers7 August 20269 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 94 days, net -1,424. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,123–8,975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 17:367,337-21
6 Nov 2026, 06:497,358-15
3 Nov 2026, 07:547,373-18
31 Oct 2026, 07:297,391-20
28 Oct 2026, 13:167,411+1
25 Oct 2026, 21:517,410-24
22 Oct 2026, 22:377,434-19
20 Oct 2026, 03:217,453-23
17 Oct 2026, 09:567,476-50
14 Oct 2026, 08:267,526-55
10 Oct 2026, 11:407,581-92
4 Oct 2026, 19:177,673-42
25 Sept 2026, 08:007,715-144
16 Sept 2026, 15:017,859-80
13 Sept 2026, 05:377,939-135
9 Sept 2026, 11:008,074-86
4 Sept 2026, 07:208,160-62
31 Aug 2026, 11:558,222-38
28 Aug 2026, 13:558,260-30
25 Aug 2026, 18:438,290first reading

Engagement

344 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.1%
avg views ÷ 7,337 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
124 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.306%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
124
of 344 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 95 of 124 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held344 (6 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total173,682
Reactions total425
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 18:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,070
Videos
≈17,500
Links
≈1,480

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7h 24m
Average length
1m 45s

Measured directly from 254 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,316 reactions across 263 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍38529.3%
❤36427.7%
😁1289.73%
👎1138.59%
👏765.78%
🤣705.32%
😢624.71%
😱473.57%
🔥372.81%
💯171.29%
🤔151.14%
🥰20.152%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 274 of the 344 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,316 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 344 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 124 posts held from the last 30 days (4.84%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 13:58 UTC790 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

Terma jamoa tibbiy shtabiga olish kerakmikin a?) ✅@Jizzaxjonuz

12 Nov 2026, 13:54 UTC789 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

#ана_холос Боғчадан 34 МЛН сўм қарз 😳 Боласини боғчага бераётган ота-оналар, сизлар ҳам тўловлар ва қарздорлик ҳолатини бир текшириб қўйинглар! ✅@Jizzaxjonuz

12 Nov 2026, 13:54 UTC745 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

#ана_холос «GM» автомобильлари омборларда тўпланиб, сотилмай ётган экан! Маълумотларга кўра, «Ўзавтосаноат»нинг фойдаси ҳам икки бараварга камайган. Рақобат кучайса, бозорда вазият ҳам ўзгаради. Харидор энди танлаш имкониятига эга! ✅@Jizzaxjonuz

12 Nov 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

#ДИҚҚАТ ‼️ЭҲТИЁЖМАНД ОИЛАЛАРГА ЯХШИ ХАБАР! Эҳтиёжманд оилалар бир вақтнинг ўзида бир нечта ёрдам компенсациялари ва нафақаларини олиши мумкин. Бу ҳақда Ижтимоий ҳимоя агентлиги масъули маълум қилди. Яқинларга ҳам юбориб қўямиз!👇 ✅@Jizzaxjonuz

12 Nov 2026, 09:53 UTC≈1,910 views22 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

#ТЕЗКОР #АНА_ХОЛОС «ЯЙЛОВ ЧИПТАСИ» деган қонун қабул қилиниши кутилмоқда экан😳 ❗️Бу нима дегани десанглар, энди мол ва қўйлар учун ўт ўришга ҳам чипта сотиб олиш керак бўлади. Яъни уйдаги молларга ҳам ўт ўриб келиш учун пул тўлайсиз, кейин ўт ўришга рухсат оласиз. Агар даладан ўт ўришга чиптангиз бўлмаса, жаримага тушиб қолишингиз мумкин. УЙДА МОЛ ВА ҚЎЙ БОҚАДИГАН ТАНИШЛАРГА ЮБОРИБ ҚЎЯМИЗ ✅@Jizzaxjonuz

👎10🤣9❤2🤔1

12 Nov 2026, 08:14 UTC≈2,380 views6 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

❗️Расман: Ўзбекистонда 12 йиллик мактаб таълимига ўтишга тайёргарлик кўрилмоқда 2027 йилдан бошлаб 6 ёшли болалар учун мактабларда бепул мажбурий тайёрлов гуруҳлари очилиши режалаштирилган. Режага кўра, мактабгача тайёрлов билан қамраб олиш даражаси 100 фоизга етказилади. Бу тартиб 12 йиллик таълим тизимига ўтиш жараёнининг бир қисми ҳисобланади. Ушбу янгиликни яқинларингиз билан ҳам бўлишинг! ✅@Jizzaxjonuz

❤3👍2👎1

12 Nov 2026, 04:52 UTC≈1,410 views3 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

❗️Мактаб тизимида муҳим ўзгариш! 2027 йилдан мактаб таълимида муҳим ўзгаришлар бўлиши кутилмоқда. Батафсил маълумот видеода! Бизни кузатишда давом этинг! @Jizzaxjonuz

❤2👍1

12 Nov 2026, 04:14 UTC≈1,440 views7 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#ТАЪЗИЯ Кабуловлар оиласида оғир жудолик. Кабулов Эркин Абдусаматович 78 ёшларида ҳаётдан кўз юмдилар. Марҳум умрлари давомида “Енгилсаноат” соҳасида раҳбар лавозимларида фаолият олиб бориб, Ўзбекистон Республикаси “Дўстлик” ордени соҳиби эдилар. Марҳум инсон жонкуяр ота, суюкли бобо, меҳрибон оила бошлиғи эдилар. Уларнинг инсонпарварлик фазилатлари, меҳнатлари ва соф қалблари фарзандлари ҳамда яқинлари қалбида абад…

❤5😢2

12 Nov 2026, 01:00 UTC≈1,470 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

ХАЙРЛИ ТОНГ! 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ ☀️Ассалому алайкум! Пайшанба тонги муборак бўлсин! Бугунги бошланаётган янги кунингиз файзли ва барокатли бўлсин! Сиз ва яқинларингизни яхши кайфият асло тарк этмасин! ▶️Каналга обуна бўлинг ва мухим хабарларни биринчи ўқинг👇 ✅@Jizzaxjonuz

❤1

11 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC≈1,510 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#ДИҚҚАТ #ЯХШИ_ХАБАР ‼️Ўзбекистонда телефонлар арзонлашиши мумкин: импорт божи 0 фоизга туширилади Ўзбекистон Жаҳон савдо ташкилотига (ЖСТ) аъзо бўлиш доирасида мобиль телефонлар импорти учун божхона божини бекор қилишни режалаштирмоқда. Бу телефонлар нархини тахминан 5 фоизга арзонлаштириши мумкин. ▶️Каналга обуна бўлинг ва мухим хабарларни биринчи ўқинг👇 ✅@Jizzaxjonuz

❤3🤣3👎1👏1

11 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC≈1,440 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

🇮🇳👥 Ҳиндистон аҳолиси сони. Бир сонияда қанчалик тез кўпайишига қаранг! ✅@Jizzaxjonuz

😱4👎1

11 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

Koʻp qavatli uyning qurilishi nega toʻxtab qoldi? Kanalimizga obuna boʻling 👉@Jizzaxjonuz

Showing the 12 most recent of 344 posts we hold for @Jizzaxjonuz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Nov 2026, 11:26 UTCAnonymous Poll97 voters

1. Siz on line bukmekerlik platformalaridan foydalanganmisiz? (Pul tikish bilan bog’liq)

  1. Xa foydalanganman12%
  2. Eshitganman lekin foydalanmaganman44%
  3. Eshitmaganman44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 11:26 UTCAnonymous Poll94 voters

2. Agar on line bukmekirlarga pul tikkan bo’lsangiz buni qanchalik tez-tez amalga oshirgansiz?

  1. 1 marta10%
  2. Oyiga bir necha marta1%
  3. Xaftasiga bir necha marta3%
  4. Deyarli xar kuni2%
  5. Pul tikmaganman85%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 11:26 UTCAnonymous Poll90 voters

3. On line bukmekerlikka pul tikish sizda yoki tanishlaringizda moliyaviy yoki psixologik qiyinchiliklar (qarzdorlik, xavotir, stress, o’qishga diqqatni jamlay olmaslik) keltirib chiqarganmi?

  1. Xa, o’zimda3%
  2. Xa, tanishimda28%
  3. Yo’q69%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 344 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

JIZZAX 24 | TEZKOR XABARLARI
@Jizzaxx · 25,582
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
JIZZAXLIKLAR🇺🇿
@Jizzax · 228,853
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026
Jizzaxliklar | Жиззахликлар
@Jizzaxliklar_Info_Zomin_Paxtakor · 78,337
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 17 August 2026
Yulduz Usmonova
@YULDUZ_USMONOVA · 69,050
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 19 August 2026
Jizzax viloyati hokimi
@jizzaxviloyatihokimi · 29,230
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JIZZAXJON🇺🇿” (@Jizzaxjonuz), 7,337 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jizzaxjonuz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.