Channel
@Jinsenp02
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
134subscribers
+26 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002610890960 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Jinsenp02 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Jinsenp02 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 06:37 | 134 | +8 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 126 | no change |
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 126 | +8 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 118 | +9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:14 | 109 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 108 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 August 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,153 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 22:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 75.0% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【服务评分，满分10】：9 【妹子花名】：元来 【验证留名】：匿名 【验证时间】：9月24日 【ci地点】：到店 【人照相似真人打几分】：10，跟照片一模一样，纯纯自然，一身小裙裙 【身高身材】：小巧形，160左右吧 【凶器罩杯】：B，手感不错，一手握得住 【个人标签】：清纯甜妹 【环境细节】：一般，房间有上一个人留下的烟味，但是床很大，如果再加上一次性床单就更好了 【服务过程】：闲来无事，想着cj一下新人，跟照片没区别。主动性还够，但是也需要引导，挺喜欢笑的，从头嗦到底，还是有些许敏感，能给真实反馈，不像是装的。缺点是不能大蟒🐍，不过整体不错的，值得二刷
【服务评分，满分10】：9 【妹子花名】：#里里 【验证留名】：zm 【验证时间】：9月21日 【ci地点】：到店 【人照相似真人打几分】：人照无差，好看 【身高身材】：身高腿长，皮肤光滑 【凶器罩杯】：不大，b吧 【个人标签】：外御内甜 【环境细节】：房间干净，隔音好。虽然投影是歪的，但也没看几眼屏幕，听个响。 【服务过程】：看模卡一眼看中了里里，中奖之后也是直接出击了。聊天很愉快，妹妹很会抛话题和接梗，全程没有看手机。尺度的话套餐内都没有问题，提了要求配合度也很高。非常顶，下次还点
【服务评分，满分10】：10 【妹子花名】：#缘来 【验证留名】：匿名 【验证时间】：9月20日 【ci地点】：到店 【人照相似真人打几分】：10分 【身高身材】：160 【凶器罩杯】：B吧 【个人标签】：清纯甜妹 【环境细节】：房间卫生良好 【服务过程】：到店又没有碰到圣代，没办法就海选了一下，看到了缘来，清纯可爱一眼就相中了，纯新人第一次接触这个，服务没有问题，套餐里的都可以，身材不错没有纹身，不抽烟，接吻可以不太熟练，非常敏感挺怕痒的，体验非常不错，值得二刷推荐。
【服务评分，满分10】：8 【妹子花名】：#里里 【验证留名】：xx 【验证时间】：9月20日 【ci地点】：到店 【人照相似真人打几分】：人照无差，9分相似 【身高身材】：身高170+，腿又细又长，皮肤不错 【凶器罩杯】：胸型大概b，手感不错 【个人标签】：气质御姐 【环境细节】：房间卫生良好，但是沙发太窄了，没有床，难以施展 【服务过程】：中了300券来找的里里，妹妹身材高挑，目测有一米七往上，人照基本无差，很有气质。由于是新人，主动性不足，但是套餐内的要求会尽量配合，态度很好，能看得出来一直在找话题避免冷场。腿很长，脚很漂亮，🐻不大但是很挺拔，喜欢美腿和玉足的兄弟可以直接冲。整体而言值得二刷。
❤2
【服务评分，满分10】：10 【妹子花名】：#x芭乐 【验证留名】：PP 【验证时间】：9月20日 【ci地点】：到店 【人照相似真人打几分】 【环境细节】：房间卫生是否良好 【服务过程】：外地游玩回来。看到夏总发的妹妹甚是喜欢。没有人去这怎么行啊。马上联系出发。第一次去尚泽转了半圈才找到入口累死了。 废话不多说了，又是一次工兵之旅。妹妹如图一。非常漂亮，没有纹身，不抽烟。肤若凝脂。特别大腿又长又滑。身高，身材没的说。胸勉强B➕。开始聊天消除尴尬期。后面就让她做我腿上了。然后卸甲开始亲亲我我。挺怕痒的。不过不会排斥到推开你。会隐忍一下。纯新人还是放不开，尺度略小。接吻不太会。下面不让摸，勉强摸几下。屁股倒是可以那就揉揉屁股吧。后面就亲一会聊一会。慢慢时间就结束了。总结冲着颜值去放心冲。尺度去还是掂量一下吧。(结束十一点了她赶着回宿舍。正好开车在门口遇到，顺便送回去了。)
❤1
【服务评分，满分10】：10 【妹子花名】：#夏夏 【验证留名】：匿名 【验证时间】：9.18 【ci地点】：#到店 【人照相似真人打几分】：人照 9分颜值 9分。气质/穿搭 8分 【身高身材】：瘦瘦小小的，皮肤很滑，比例不错，腿好看 【凶器罩杯】：a到b吧 【个人标签】：面容精致，看脸比较御，可爱的小只马 【环境细节】：环境不错 还有一次性床单 【服务过程】：几个月前还在玩的时候就见过夏夏了，当时想着就是有机会要去点一下，几个月过去感觉夏夏面容更精致更好看了，但是也更瘦了。寒暄唏嘘一番，虽然因为一面之缘夏夏对我没有印象，但是我对当时记得还是蛮深的。虽然夏夏话也没有很多，但是气氛上也不会冷场，氛围还是很好的，也会主动亲亲。服务不用说，很喜欢看夏夏害羞不好意思的表情，就是时间有点短了，相约下次见面。
【服务评分，满分10】：10 【妹子花名】：#圣代 【验证留名】：匿名 【验证时间】：9.17 【ci地点】：#到店 【人照相似真人打几分】：人照 7分颜值 7分。气质/穿搭 8分 【身高身材】：身高170左右 腿长够用 皮肤手感一级棒 【凶器罩杯】：胸超大 吊钟巨乳。整体手感 10分 【个人标签】：童颜巨乳 【环境细节】：环境不错 沙发换成床就完美了 【服务过程】：进门say hello 因为等了半个小时圣代老师进门还道歉了 这都小事 随便选个电视听个响直接进入正题 先是来个五分钟超级大蟒蛇 亲到口水拉丝的那种。然后就是你一下我一下的互相博弈 拉扯。最终双双胜利结算画面 体验不错 小瑕疵不值一提。
👎2
【服务评分，满分10】：9 【妹子花名】：小六一 【验证留名】：暗夜总 【验证时间】：9月16日 【ci地点】：外派 【人照相似真人打几分】：8人照基本不相似，但是MM很漂亮，是长相甜妹型 【身高身材】：160左右，皮肤手感 【凶器罩杯】：c到d吧，整体手感无敌 【个人标签】：童颜巨乳 【环境细节】：我的酒店相当好 【服务过程】：点了六一的外派，由于MM离得远迟到了一个半小时，就在我已经等不住的时候她终于来了，初见一眼可爱型，童颜巨乳是我喜欢的类型，就看后面能不能俘获我了。 夜色浸得房间软软的，暖黄的小夜灯落了浅浅一层光在被褥上，两人挨在一起躺着，周遭静得只剩轻轻的呼吸声，六一微微闭上眼，下意识轻轻抬手，搭在我的肩头，慢慢凑近回应，吻很轻，温柔得像晚风拂过湖面，不急不躁，褪去了所有浮躁。接下来的画面只能脑补了，该有的全都有，我最中意的是她的眼神，一种想留不能留的感觉。。。。
【服务评分，满分10】：9 【妹子花名】：#里里 【验证留名】：伊莱克斯 【验证时间】：9月16日 【ci地点】：#到店 【人照相似真人打几分】：人照一致，颜值高，气质佳 【身高身材】：身高至少170，腿长，皮肤光滑，黄皮肤 【凶器罩杯】：胸不大，应该有B 【个人标签】：#长腿甜妹 【环境细节】：干净整洁，大沙发床不错 【服务过程】：非常荣幸中券，在夏总的大力推荐下，赶紧出击新人里里，约的头种，提前到了，没想到在门口遇到了女主，完整呈现OOTD，高挑的身材，大长腿，小脸盆，高鼻梁。一起进门。 过程很愉悦，聊天很开心，配合度可以，套餐内的没有任何问题，黑色小蕾丝没有办法完全包裹，粉色小乳贴把小葡萄保护的挺好，只要不过分的要求都能配合，由于是新人，主动性略有不足，需要兄弟们主动提，大胆干，拼命探索，强力引导，要调教。总体感觉良好，开发空间大。
【妹子花名】：#里里 【验证留名】：mubaimini 【验证时间】：9月15日 【ci地点】：到店 【人照相似真人打几分】：人照相似程度80%，颜值是否好看：好看，气质/穿搭如何：露背装＋小短裤 【身高身材】：身高:173 腿长：巨长， 【凶器罩杯】：胸型大小：喜欢大的就不找里里 【个人标签】：#长腿小御姐 【环境细节】：房间卫生是否良好：没有毯子，另外沙发不利于发挥，如果有沙发床就更好了，电视投影是斜的，只能看免费的（不过也没人是来看电影的吧😂） 【服务过程】：领班带圣诞和里里一起进来，本来就是冲着里里来的，果断里里（圣诞的胸是真的大），然后里里进来先搂着选电视看，然后摸胸，摸里里下面，里里主动半躺让我摸下面，然后里里把小短裤脱了，只穿一个黑色情趣内裤，然后……剩下细节就不展开了，反正很爽。里里很香，很温柔，敏感点是耳后根。
【服务评分，满分10】：10 【妹子花名】：里里 【验证留名】：xx 【验证时间】：9月14日 【ci地点】：到店 【人照相似真人打几分】：10.本人比照片好看。 【身高身材】：漫画腿还长，身材特别苗条。 【凶器罩杯】：B 【个人标签】：#气质御姐 【环境细节】：干净整洁。 【服务过程】：妹子是新人。但是服从力特别强，当时妹子穿的是短裤，我让她把短裤脱了，她立马就脱了，脱了就看到他穿着黑色蕾丝性感的小内裤。当时欲望就被勾起来了。上下齐攻。妹子不拒绝，而且是很享受的。能感受到妹子下面水很多。舌吻，舔胸，摸下面配合度极高。就是妹子，毕竟是新人聊天需要我领着他聊。但是绝对不会冷场。真的好长时间没有玩到这种服从性极强的妹子，而且还有一点小m。非常非常值得二刷。总是让我感觉下一次会有别的惊喜。
【服务评分，满分10】：9 【妹子花名】：#小鱼 【验证留名】：老王 【验证时间】：9/11 【ci地点】：到店 【人照相似真人打几分】：照片跟本人不像 【身高身材】：正常身材，一丢丢肉 【凶器罩杯】：有就比没有强 【个人标签】：#邻家妹妹 【环境细节】：在尚泽，房间倒是挺大 【服务过程】：妹妹很温柔也很害羞，没什么尺度，喜欢服务和尺度的不用浪费时间啦，但是没人规定出击就是一定什么都要做，聊聊天，吹吹牛，自己的感觉最重要不是吗
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Jinsenp02. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“堇色·合肥女仆反馈频道” (@Jinsenp02), 134 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jinsenp02.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.