Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jinpeng $JIN

Channel

Jinpeng $JIN

@JinpengSol

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

30,869subscribers

-306 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002083287756
TypeChannel
Username@JinpengSol
DescriptionTwitter: https://x.com/JinpengSol Admin: @XiJinpengSol
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JinpengSol

Growth

30,86931,17531,0227 August 2026 — 31,175 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,175 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,154 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,105 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,065 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,021 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,001 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,951 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,905 subscribers15 August 2026 — 30,869 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -306. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,823–31,221 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:3830,869-36
14 Aug 2026, 12:2830,905-46
13 Aug 2026, 04:1530,951-50
12 Aug 2026, 03:5531,001-20
11 Aug 2026, 06:0131,021-44
10 Aug 2026, 04:5731,065-40
9 Aug 2026, 03:1131,105-49
8 Aug 2026, 01:5531,154-21
7 Aug 2026, 13:0031,175no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:5731,175first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
146
Videos
2
Links
134

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

161 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8955.3%
🔥2515.5%
👎116.83%
🤣106.21%
👍95.59%
👏63.73%
💩31.86%
🥰31.86%
😁21.24%
🥴21.24%
🤔10.621%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2025 to 23 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Dec 2025, 20:11 UTC817 views9 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

America still thinks wars are about missiles and tanks… but the real nightmare is a Chinese tech-dragon launching chips instead of rockets. Sleep tight. 😴🐉💻🔥 #China #TechWar #AI #Chips #Jin

6🔥2👏1

6 Nov 2025, 20:58 UTC≈1,140 views5 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

ASEAN in 2025 be like: “Too big to ignore, too close to escape.” The China–US squeeze is getting real 😅🌏 China #USA #ASEAN #Geopolitics #ChinaUS #MemePolitics #Asia #JIN #ChinaVsUS

4😁1

15 Oct 2025, 21:36 UTC≈1,310 views7 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Trade wars be like: “$50!” “¥400!” Bro… this ain’t an auction 😒⚓️ #JIN #China #US #TradeWar #Tariffs #MemeEconomy #Geopolitics

6👏1

11 Oct 2025, 13:36 UTC≈1,370 views4 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

📉 When global trade turns into a poker game… Trump: “100% tariffs!” China: “Global export restrictions.” Markets: “We’re doomed.” 😭📊

🤣21🔥1

8 Oct 2025, 22:37 UTC≈1,200 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

♟️ You can bring all the allies you want… But when your opponent’s a grandmaster, every move hits different 😎🔥 https://x.com/jinpengsol/status/1976053022653636787?s=46

🔥2👍1

27 Sept 2025, 15:47 UTC≈1,150 views8 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Billions spent on the world’s strongest cybersecurity systems… yet one guy with a $10 keyboard and green tea still gets in. 🥴💻☕ #CyberSecurity #USvsChina #HackerLife #JIN

🤣52🥰1

20 Sept 2025, 09:20 UTC≈1,090 views7 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

US: “We just triggered the snapback mechanism!” China: “Bro, whoever you are, sit down 😏🍵” #Iran #US #China #Snapback #Geopolitics #JIN

2👎1💩1🔥1🤔1🤣1

12 Sept 2025, 18:23 UTC≈1,250 views5 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

When you’re just a dancing app but end up in a Cold War sequel 😅 #TikTokBan #ChinaVsUS #JIN

3👏1💩1

12 Sept 2025, 18:23 UTC≈1,120 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

When you’re just a dancing app but end up in a Cold War sequel 😅 #TikTokBan #ChinaVsUS #JIN

3

2 Sept 2025, 19:30 UTC≈1,290 views6 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Trump: “No more Chinese students!” China: “Cool, here’s 600,000 more 🎒📚✈️” https://x.com/jinpengsol/status/1962960867814748281?s=46

4💩1🔥1

26 Aug 2025, 18:15 UTC≈1,260 views11 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Farmers just want to sell soybeans & rice 🌾🍚 Meanwhile US & China: 🎮 ‘Next round of Trade Wars!’ Comment below 👇 https://x.com/jinpengsol/status/1960405521045053665?s=46

7🤣2👎1🥰1

22 Aug 2025, 16:08 UTC≈1,240 views13 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

✈️🇨🇳 When Boeing says: 500 planes on Black Friday sale… China: Let me check if shipping is free first 😏 https://x.com/jinpengsol/status/1958924147565777048?s=46

5🔥5👎1🥴1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JinpengSol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,129,522 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jinpeng $JIN” (@JinpengSol), 30,869 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JinpengSol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.