https://t.me/+BKo9q22TI8cxODYy Кто захочет тот зайдёт, пока ссылка действует (по желанию)
custom 59946069000905066562custom 57875162085762048681custom 58011790450056277431
Signed Xxx
![Telegram profile photo for [РЕСТ]𝐽𝑖𝑚'𝑠 𝐿𝑎𝑖𝑟](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/ad/ad59695a57f6d2eef4058174dedeb46d324ffab576b94d834190a5d514603581.jpg)
Channel
@JimSLair
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003710773280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JimSLair |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JimSLair |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:27 | 54 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 50 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 49 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 44 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 44 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (2 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 543 |
| Reactions total | 143 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
199 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5787516208576204868 | 55 | 27.6% | |
| custom 5994606900090506656 | 50 | 25.1% | |
| custom 5801179045005627743 | 43 | 21.6% | |
| custom 5906509067785866421 | 35 | 17.6% | |
| custom 6032683872523652374 | 16 | 8.04% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @JimSLair. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
https://t.me/+BKo9q22TI8cxODYy Кто захочет тот зайдёт, пока ссылка действует (по желанию)
custom 59946069000905066562custom 57875162085762048681custom 58011790450056277431
Signed Xxx
💝 Реакции, рт пожалуйста <3
custom 58011790450056277434custom 59946069000905066562custom 60326838725236523742custom 57875162085762048681custom 59065090677858664211
Signed 𝒥𝒾𝓂
Арт Тигриного Когтя/Такеши в виде мутанта🌺 #art #tmnt2012 #Тигриный_Коготь #Такеши
custom 590650906778586642110custom 58011790450056277435custom 57875162085762048683custom 59946069000905066563custom 60326838725236523742
Signed 𝒥𝒾𝓂
АРТ ОТ ЛЮБИМКИ❤️❤️❤️
custom 58011790450056277434custom 57875162085762048683custom 59065090677858664212custom 59946069000905066561
Signed 𝒥𝒾𝓂
Ну там просто накидайте реакций и всё<3
custom 59946069000905066563custom 58011790450056277432custom 60326838725236523741
Signed 𝒥𝒾𝓂
Фанаты банановой рыбки уже бы заплакали..☹️ Шортер для разогрева #art #banana_fish #Шортер_Вонг
custom 57875162085762048688custom 58011790450056277434custom 59065090677858664213custom 59946069000905066561custom 60326838725236523741
Signed 𝒥𝒾𝓂
Я вот думаю использовать Антона для прайс-листа. Вот он в полный рост зато. Там много чего сделаю. ТК дорисовываю, скоро возьмусь за хэдканон. Там ещё буду делать другим персонажам редизайн (мне эта тематика зашла)
custom 59946069000905066566custom 57875162085762048683custom 58011790450056277432custom 59065090677858664212custom 60326838725236523741
Ну вы это пожалуйста накидайте побольше реакций 💗
custom 57875162085762048686custom 60326838725236523744custom 58011790450056277432custom 59946069000905066561
⭐️Нарисовала просто так арт редизайна Антона (уже более похожего) ⭐️ #арт #редизайн #tmnt2012 #Антон_Зек
custom 590650906778586642111custom 57875162085762048687custom 58011790450056277434custom 59946069000905066563custom 60326838725236523741
Ребят, не теряйте меня. У меня проблемы с поступлением и вообще всё фигово. Я разбираюсь сейчас с проблемами, так что вот пока мини-скетч посмотрите, а то завалялся (кривой, да). Могу пока скетчи кидать. Но ни в какой рест не ухожу #Скетч
custom 578751620857620486811custom 59946069000905066564custom 58011790450056277433custom 59065090677858664211custom 60326838725236523741
Итоги по опросам: Намечается хэдканон по Карай И арт по Тигриному Когтю
custom 59946069000905066567custom 58011790450056277432custom 60326838725236523742
Мини-спойлер к обычному арту(не хэдканон):
custom 599460690009050665613custom 58011790450056277435custom 59065090677858664214
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @JimSLair. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[РЕСТ]𝐽𝑖𝑚'𝑠 𝐿𝑎𝑖𝑟” (@JimSLair), 54 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JimSLair.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.