Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TeachFull πŸ’Ž CALL πŸ’΅

Channel

TeachFull πŸ’Ž CALL πŸ’΅

@JiaofuCall

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry

1,421subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001937351348
TypeChannel
Username@JiaofuCall
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JiaofuCall

Growth

1,4211,4311,4267 August 2026 β€” 1,431 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 1,431 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 1,430 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 1,426 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 1,425 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 1,424 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 1,423 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 1,421 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 22 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,420–1,433 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 09:071,421-2
26 Aug 2026, 14:251,423-1
23 Aug 2026, 20:361,424-1
19 Aug 2026, 22:221,425-1
13 Aug 2026, 03:051,426-4
10 Aug 2026, 10:241,430-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:171,431no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:161,431first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
10.9%
avg views Γ· 1,421 subscribers
Avg views / post
155
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.24%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 July 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total777
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀‍πŸ”₯3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC134 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

δΈ‹δΈ€δΈͺη›˜ε€η€ΎεŒΊ 可δ»₯冲δΈͺ500-1000εˆ€ ι•ΏζœŸζ‹Ώη€

❀‍πŸ”₯3

4 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC145 viewsread 7 August 2026

0x19f46fddbac1ab00d203cc80515a44e320260419 εˆεΌ€ε§‹θΏ›ε€§ε•δΊ† θΏ™ζ³’ε›žθ°ƒεΊ”θ―₯θ¦η»“ζŸδΊ† δΈ‹δΈ€ζ³’0.1εˆ€ 1εˆ€θ§

4 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC152 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

ε€ͺ初 Buy! πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜— πŸ’΅ 6000.00 USDT πŸͺ™ 102,379 Chaos πŸ”₯ 6,901 Chaos Burned πŸ”Ά 0xb1eb…4362 | Txn βœ… New Holder πŸ”Ό Market Cap $5,601,093 πŸ“Š Chart 🐰 Trade πŸ”Έ Trending

3 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC165 viewsread 7 August 2026

0x15019a7242afdaa8f1010f4526513989f2087777 ε‰ζŽ’ε…¨ζ˜―εΊ„

Signed ζ•™ηˆΆ PVP loserη‰ˆ

2 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC181 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

0xb43dcf9139169ceb4660aa4d8d2c1ec66345ffff θ‹±δΌŸθΎΎ fourmeme ιƒ½ζ˜―η»Ώθ‰²ηš„οΌŒθ§’εΊ¦δΈι”™

Signed ζ•™ηˆΆ PVP loserη‰ˆ

31 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC214 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed ζ•™ηˆΆ PVP loserη‰ˆ

31 Jul 2026, 08:29 UTC190 viewsread 7 August 2026

0xa08d425950ae19f2343412a690640b52745affff

Signed ζ•™ηˆΆ PVP loserη‰ˆ

30 Jul 2026, 11:49 UTC215 viewsread 7 August 2026

0xbd758bebf1a6892d0ec2453e82c9c4ac22b37777 bscηŽ°ι‡‘ηŒ«

Signed ζ•™ηˆΆ PVP loserη‰ˆ

30 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC206 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

0xe3891f18fa354f3168935a0a0e26a86454667777 η”Ÿζ΄»εœ¨εœ°ηƒε°±δΉ°εœ°ηƒεΈοΌŒczδΉŸζθΏ‡ 角度概忡不错。

Signed ζ•™ηˆΆ PVP loserη‰ˆ

28 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC195 viewsread 7 August 2026

0xf152ed124a1f6d4233bcad6e5b27734143178888 ι©¬ζ–―ε…‹δΈ€η›΄ζƒ³εΌ€ηš„ε…¬εΈε«εšθΏ™δΈͺοΌŒι‘Άε°–θ§’εΊ¦ 0税kε…ˆε₯½ηœ‹η‚Ή

Signed ζ•™ηˆΆ PVP loserη‰ˆ

27 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC239 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

ε€ͺ初 Buy! πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜—πŸ˜— πŸ’΅ 2006.019 USDT πŸͺ™ 25,602 Chaos πŸ”Ά 0xf4b1…d629 | Txn πŸ”Ό Position +0.84% πŸ”Ό Market Cap $7,185,934 πŸ“Š Chart 🐰 Trade πŸ”Έ Trending

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JiaofuCall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œTeachFull πŸ’Ž CALL πŸ’΅β€ (@JiaofuCall), 1,421 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JiaofuCall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.