Первый не пишу НИКОГДА ! Только один актуальный контакт : [email protected]
По рекламе @qodeex
Ставочный ТГ : t.me/jerrybets256
https://exitl.ag/jerrycs2 - ссылка на скидку Exitlag'a
Created
14 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net +2,729. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,234–40,719 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 21:19
38,220
-70
8 Nov 2026, 14:41
38,290
-45
7 Nov 2026, 11:45
38,335
-38
6 Nov 2026, 09:09
38,373
-54
5 Nov 2026, 06:30
38,427
-39
4 Nov 2026, 06:38
38,466
-62
3 Nov 2026, 06:29
38,528
-46
2 Nov 2026, 03:29
38,574
-59
1 Nov 2026, 03:27
38,633
-75
31 Oct 2026, 01:31
38,708
-70
30 Oct 2026, 02:30
38,778
-145
29 Oct 2026, 05:26
38,923
-127
28 Oct 2026, 01:37
39,050
-109
27 Oct 2026, 01:51
39,159
-92
26 Oct 2026, 01:00
39,251
-120
24 Oct 2026, 21:41
39,371
-179
23 Oct 2026, 21:37
39,550
-305
22 Oct 2026, 20:51
39,855
+1,042
21 Oct 2026, 18:28
38,813
+4,080
20 Oct 2026, 15:58
34,733
first reading
Engagement
153 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 193 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.8%
avg views ÷ 38,220 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,200
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 153 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
153 (25 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
460,910
Reactions total
4,972
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 03:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,880
Videos
≈32
Links
≈452
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 11s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,684 reactions across 151 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10,732
60.7%
😁
1,579
8.93%
🔥
1,090
6.16%
🙏
876
4.95%
👍
802
4.54%
🤣
561
3.17%
😢
307
1.74%
🥰
160
0.905%
💯
157
0.888%
😭
134
0.758%
🤔
131
0.741%
👎
119
0.673%
🤡
117
0.662%
🤯
115
0.65%
❤🔥
110
0.622%
🎉
96
0.543%
🤩
92
0.52%
💘
69
0.39%
👌
54
0.305%
👏
44
0.249%
32 further kinds
339
1.92%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 151 of the 153 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,684 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 46 posts held from the last 30 days (21.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Я думаю еще один такой денек и мой экспресс тренинг будет завершен.
Методика супер легкая - 1000 ботов на завтрак - 5-6 фейситов - 1000 ботов на ужин.
Так за 2 дня до турнира попробую вернуть форму. Узнаем поможет это или нет уже на самом турике)
Завтра после Шанхая запуск ближе к 15-16,там в зависимости от матчей!
Ребят , сорри за радиомолчание на этих выходных - был серьезный повод :)
Я узнал что стану отцом дочери 🔥
Вернусь к стримам во вторник - там подготовка к двум медиа турнирам + еще пару активностей сделаем !
Всем хорошего вечера воскресенья )
Сегодня мы стали свидетелями аномалии "Железобетонная защита" на кт ориентированных картах.
ББ не смогли закрыть нюк с 9-3 за ЗАЩИТУ.
Falcons не смогли взять ни одного раунда за ЗАЩИТУ на Мираже.
Что это? Легкая расслабленность перед мажором? Или удивительная атака от Lulquid/Na'vi?
Я склоняюсь все-таки к расслабленности,именно перед мажором происходят подобные "Аномалии". Иными словами это в первую очередь пси…
Ушла эпоха - теперь hltv делает три симуляции потенциального вето с шансами на каждый из сценариев.
В 2026 году avg зрителю вообще теперь можно не думать - все уже сделали за нас.
"Больше мы не собираем экспрессы в слепую,теперь мы знаем вето наперед лол"
Ждем когда будут делать выжимки из интервью топ игроков в виде hltv-рилса на 20 секунд,где передана основная суть 😜😜😜😜
Доброе утро !
Маленький видосик о том , как и за счет чего можно победить таких перцев как Vitality 😁
https://youtu.be/3coGl5vNUZ8?is=dVTzLtanByPGMvyI
Спойлер - они дали много пространства Kairon and Robo
Если это не найс трай , то я Джамшут
А без шуток - желаю команде Немига обрести стабильность . Надоели одни и те же коллективы в битвах за трофеи !
Сюда свежую кровь 🩸!!!
Доброе утро ☀️
Ну что , вчера демки Немиги посмотрели : если Fallen and co это тоже сделали , то увидели одну вещь – риски для Nemiga хорошо окупались , но делать ставки на те же риски и мувы будет не особо выгодно , так что жду от Немиги те самые «тактики для мажора» сегодня .
А еще это бо5…. Тут надо пул из карт иметь …. У Фурии он точно есть , а вот у Nemiga ….
В вы за кого болеете ?)
Плей-офф Pari Universe идёт прямо сейчас
А между матчами — пара слов про карту для тех, кто платит в играх 🟡
Киберкарта ВТБ:
🔥 Получай 15% кешбэка за пополнение Steam, PS Store и других игровых сервисов
🔥 Дизайн на твой вкус: по мотивам игр CS2, Dota 2 или Дракон
🔥 Карта светится при оплате
🔥 Выпуск и обслуживание — 0 ₽
Не упускай выгоду — пополняй Steam с кешбэком👇
💳 Оформить карту
Впереди решающие матчи — не в…
❤14🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 153 posts we hold for @Jerry2strong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Jerry2strong edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 18 posts on @Jerry2strong as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
16 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
8
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sashacheer @sashacheer · 43,461 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
tried 🤡 @hypetried · 29,294 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
НАШ КС | CIS NEWS @cscis · 47,334 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
tribe by tN1R @tN1Rcs · 55,528 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
zweihAHAHA @zweihaha · 27,723 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
hooch CS2 @hoochcs2 · 22,952 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
harumi @haruminews · 31,349 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
GameSport: МИР КИБЕРСПОРТА В CS2 @GameSportNews · 32,522 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 October 2026
PARIVISION @parivision · 39,026 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 August 2026
DEGSTER @degsterof · 47,412 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Nemiga Gaming @nemigagg · 19,272 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
Virtus.pro CS2 @virtuspro_cs2 · 22,716 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
fANDER @fandertg · 38,165 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
гет борис @getboris · 81,370 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Подвал CS | Все о ТИР-2 сцене @tier2cs · 36,843 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
GOGA • WorldEdit @WorldEditlol · 22,423 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
electronic @electronicTG · 18,463 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 October 2026
OverDrive | 20 ЛЕТ В АРКАДЕ @ihuntnoobs · 199,763 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Али “Jame” Джами @jametimetv · 30,846 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 September 2026
sh1ro @sh1rocs2 · 71,552 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
RachelR @RachelRcsgo · 44,548 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
zoner and CO @mechanogun · 57,667 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Тетрадка с Фишками CS2 @FISHKACS2 · 27,630 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
PARI Esports CS2 @bc_pari_esports_cs · 44,702 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr.Jerry” (@Jerry2strong), 38,220 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jerry2strong.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.