Channel
@JasonLloydBourne
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,117subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001432517233 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JasonLloydBourne |
| Created | 19 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JasonLloydBourne |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 1,117 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 1,116 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 1,116 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
320 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 122 | 38.1% | |
| 🤬 | 56 | 17.5% | |
| ❤ | 30 | 9.38% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 9.06% | |
| 😢 | 27 | 8.44% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 4.06% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 2.19% | |
| 🖕 | 5 | 1.56% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 1.56% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 1.56% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 1.56% | |
| 🤮 | 5 | 1.56% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 1.25% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 0.938% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.938% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.313% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 320reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2022 to 29 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I'm here if you're wondering why I haven't posted. I've set up a new account about a week ago and so far things are looking better. I believe my Telegram account is compromised which is sad but it is what it is. However I will post from time to time on here so hang in there cos I may still get deleted from Twitter...who knows. @JasonLloydBourne
👍42❤13🌚3😱3
☝️Kate Shemirani - Co-founder of the British Nursing Alliance. A baby is injected with 24 diseases by the age of 24 weeks. ‘No vaccine has ever been proven safe. No vaccine has ever been proven effective. No two vaccines have ever been tested together for their efficacy’ @JasonLloydBourne
😢5🤬4❤3👍1
☝️ China - Frozen dead children were found in locals cars. Local sellers of child organs have been arrested. SQQN there will be no life for those who are Child Traffickers!!! @JasonLloydBourne
🤬31👍6😭1
☝️ A Russian volunteer reveals his troops in Izyum stumbled upon a Ukrainian “child organ network”. Ukraine: the hot zone for human trafficking and organ harvesting. It holds many secrets [they] want to keep from you. You can hear and see how it has affected him. @JasonLloydBourne
😢22👍6🤬2❤1
This is fantastic news. This means the people are waking up and the police force is getting a huge wake up call. Since I left the service 20 years ago, over the last 10+ years I've notice the decline in respect officers get from the public. They dress up as Rambo but no one fears them other than the lil old grannies. Their conduct towards the public has been disgusting and many have this "I have the power" mentalit…
👍8❤1
☝️ Biden setting the stage to take away your second amendment. [They] are losing the fight and they want a war but don't want you to be able to defend yourself cos they want to ultimately control you. @JasonLloydBourne
🤬11🖕5❤3
☝️nailed it @JasonLloydBourne
👍13🔥4❤1
☝️ this year at Thanksgiving the lefties want you to believe America was founded by violence especially if you're a Republican American who are the violent American. I don't know 🤔 weren't the Democrats pro-slavery and headed up the KKK. Also weren't they the ones who pushed ALMOST every war. Think about that for a minute!!! @JasonLloydBourne
🔥5👍2
☝️ 😂🤣 @JasonLloydBourne
🤩3👍2
☝️ Happy Thanksgiving to all struggling Americans while Ukraine eats well this year. The information is out there. If you chose not to go and look for it, you're responsible for your own stupidity. @JasonLloydBourne
👍8❤1
🚨🚨🚨 History will keep repeating itself until we learn from it and change our ways. @JasonLloydBourne
🔥7❤2
☝️ on Pervywood - Oprah This is the first 5 minutes of the doco. It’s 35 minutes in length. @JasonLloydBourne
👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JasonLloydBourne. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,355,698 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jason Q Bourne” (@JasonLloydBourne), 1,117 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JasonLloydBourne.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.