Channel
@Jafarxon_Isaxonov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
8,969subscribers
-169 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002204986243 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Jafarxon_Isaxonov |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Jafarxon_Isaxonov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 8,969 | -54 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 9,023 | -68 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 9,091 | -46 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 9,137 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 9,138 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 2 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (2 December 2025 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 533 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
⚠️ Mijozni kutdirganingiz sayin, uni raqobatchingizga topshirasiz. Bugungi bozorda tezkor javob berish shunchaki xizmat emas — bu raqobat ustunligidir. 📊 Tadqiqotlarga ko‘ra: • 5 daqiqa ichida javob berilgan murojaatlar 30 daqiqadan keyin javob berilganlarga nisbatan 21 baravar ko‘proq sifatli leadga aylanish ehtimoliga ega [Tadqiqot: MIT + InsideSales Lead Response Management Study, manba] • Harvard Business Rev…
❓ Davlat OTMlarida qabul tugadi. Xususiy universitetlarga qanday hujjat topshiriladi? ◾️ My.Oliygoh.uz platformasi orqali nufuzli OTMlarga osongina hujjat topshirish mumkin: ✅ Toshkent Amaliy Fanlar Universiteti 👉 ZARMED Universiteti 👉 Central Asian University 👉 Diplomat University 👉 Profi University 👉 Xalqaro Nordik Universiteti 👉 Webster University 👉 Toshkent Metropolitan Universiteti 👉 Millat Umidi University 👉 …
🌙 Qurbon Hayiti muborak bo‘lsin! • Oliygoh.uz jamoasi sizni va oilangizni muborak Qurbon hayiti bilan chin yurakdan tabriklaydi. ✨ Siz va yaqinlaringizga oilaviy baxt, sihat-salomatlik, faoliyatingizga muvaffaqiyat tilab qolamiz. 🤲 Ushbu muborak kunlarda qiladigan barcha ezgu duolaringiz qabul bo'lsin! 😊 Hurmat bilan Oliygoh.uz jamoasi!
Do'stlar, katta yangiligimiz bor So‘nggi yillardagi izlanishlar, bozor tahlillari va foydalanuvchi ehtiyojlarini o‘rganish natijasida Oliygoh.uz ekotizimi doirasida yangi loyihani ishga tushirish arafasidamiz. Bu — B2B SaaS asosidagi onlayn qabul va boshqaruv platformasi. Ushbu loyiha ta’lim muassasalari uchun qabul jarayonlarini raqamlashtirish, boshqaruvni soddalashtirish va samaradorlikni oshirishga xizmat qila…
📌 Kichik byudjet bilan millionlar ... Bundan 2 yil avval, Registon'da faoliyat yuritayotgan paytim, Registon markazlarining bozor pozitsiyasini yanada mustahkamlash maqsadida PR loyihalar ustida ishladim. 20 ga yaqin strategik PR loyihalar tashkil qilindi. 🔝 Shu loyihalardan eng muvafaqqiyatlisi "IELTS Granti" loyihasi bo'ldi. Ushbu loyiha o'quv markazlar faoliyatida katta burilish yasadi. Bu yerda muhim jihat shu…
2025-yilni yaxshi yakunladik Bu yil men uchun faqat raqamlar yoki natijalar emas, balki ishonch, mehnat va to‘g‘ri yo‘l tanlanganining isboti bo‘ldi. 2025-yilda biz 3 yo‘nalishda biznes boshladik: — restoran, — o‘quv markazi, — start-up loyihalar. Ushbu loyihalar orasida eng ko‘p mehnat, vaqt va e’tibor talab qilgani — MENTOR loyihasi bo‘ldi. Natija esa o‘z so‘zini aytdi. 2025-yilda Mentor loyihasi Jizzax shahrid…
Ja'farxon Isaxonov | Blog pinned a photo
Jamoaviylik va individualizm Ba’zi jamoalardagi insonlar: “Men bo‘lmasam, bu kompaniya yurmay qoladi, men eng katta kuchman”, deb o‘ylashadi, ya’ni o‘zlarini jamoadan ustun qo‘yishadi. Aslida esa ularning kuchi aynan shu jamoa orqali shakllanganini unutib qo‘yishadi. Ko‘pchilik mashhur futbolchilar qaysidir jamoada zo‘r to‘p surishadi, keyin boshqa komandaga o‘tishi bilan o‘zlarini yo‘qotib qo‘yishadi. Bizneslarda…
💰 50 ming dollarlik maslahat — sizga BEPUL (Amaliy tajribadan kerakli xulosalar) Agar kelajakda restoran biznesiga kirishni reja qilayotgan bo'lsangiz — bu postni o‘tkazib yubormang. 🍽 Restoran ochish g‘oyasi tashqaridan juda jozibador ko‘rinadi: chiroyli interyer, to‘la stol, shovqin-suron, “brand” bo‘lish orzusi. Lekin ichkaridan qaralganda bu soha — eng murakkab va eng sabr talab qiladigan bizneslardan biri. Qu…
1/1000 #book ⚡️ Nega ayrim g‘oyalar yuqumli bo‘ladi? Ta’lim loyihalari misolida Shu kunlarda Yona Bergerning “Yuqumlilik” kitobini qayta o‘qiyapman. Uni 3 yil oldin ham o‘qiganman, bugun esa boshqacha nigoh bilan tahlil qilayabman. Kitobning asosiy g‘oyasi juda sodda, lekin kuchli: 👉 Yuqumlilik — tasodifiy jarayon emas. Uni tizimli yaratish mumkin. Muallif bu jarayonni STEPPS modeli (Social Currency, Triggers, Em…
⚡️ Bugun Marketing va PR yo'nalishida amalga oshirgan real Keyslarim doirasida katta maqola chiqadi. 🔝 Nega ayrim g‘oyalar yuqumli bo‘ladi? Bu mavzu sizga qiziqmi? 👇
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Kuchli xodimlar nega kompaniyadan ketadi? So‘nggi yillarda turli kompaniyalar va o‘quv markazlaridagi jarayonlarni tahlil qilar ekanman, bir narsani chuqur angladim: xodim ketishi – bu individual muammo emas, tizim signali. ❌ Kuchli xodim “shunchaki” ketmaydi. Har chiqib ketishning ortida bir sabab, bir tajriba va bir og‘riq yotadi. Men kuzatgan va ko'rgan eng tipik 5 sabab: 1️⃣ Rahbar tomonidan e’tibor va qadrlas…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Jafarxon_Isaxonov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
⚡️ Bugun Marketing va PR yo'nalishida amalga oshirgan real Keyslarim doirasida katta maqola chiqadi. 🔝 Nega ayrim g‘oyalar yuqumli bo‘ladi? Bu mavzu sizga qiziqmi? 👇
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ChatGPT'ni "Deep Research" funksiyasidan foydalanib ko'rganmisiz?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📌 So'rovnoma Oliygoh.uz, Ustoz.uz, Mandat, Abt.uz kabi platformalarni eshitganmiz? Ulardan doimiy foydalanasizmi?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 December 2025 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,298,545 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ja'farxon Isaxonov | Blog” (@Jafarxon_Isaxonov), 8,969 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jafarxon_Isaxonov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.