Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

JABA

@JabaTelegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,189subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001654447827
TypeChannel
Username@JabaTelegram
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JabaTelegram

Growth

2,1872,1952,1916 August 2026 — 2,187 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,187 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,189 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,195 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,189 subscribers2,1896 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,186–2,196 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:272,189-6
9 Aug 2026, 19:012,195+6
6 Aug 2026, 12:412,189+2
6 Aug 2026, 06:052,187no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:562,187first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,461 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 542052661193607231831721.7%
custom 530346482585726127023516.1%
custom 523105912471999820820514.0%
custom 527638941644779042218912.9%
custom 53886208761470856861459.92%
custom 5287479631891420667926.30%
custom 5386447863213479256614.18%
custom 5303220261829491572594.04%
custom 5359368704297556821503.42%
custom 5303106032879288744463.15%
custom 5359526123438890026151.03%
custom 5386557831556126362151.03%
custom 5321550980385358820120.821%
custom 5359358980491598478110.753%
custom 530334363476506883060.411%
custom 530334115656894161630.205%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,461reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2024 to 1 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 18 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
37
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @JabaTelegram. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2024 to 1 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Mar 2026, 21:46 UTC≈10,200 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

1️⃣1️⃣ 😄😄😄😄⭐️ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✨3D Emojis: 🐸 Add | basic 🐸 Add | font 🐸 Add | admin 🐸 Add | brands 🐸 Add | finances 🐸 Add | soft ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✨Vector Emojis (HD): 🐸 Add | basic 🐸 — | font 🐸 — | admin 🐸 Add | brands 🐸 Add | finances 🐸 Add | soft ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✨Other: 🐸 Add | Crypto Flips 🌟 Add | Adaptive 3D 🔠 Add | Vector jaba 🔠 Add | Adaptive jaba 🔠 Add | Font ⭐️ Add | 3D jaba 🥪 Add | JABAmoji 🦴

4 Jul 2025, 20:54 UTC≈22,000 views0 reactions7 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

🎁 | #Concept ➖➖➖➖➖➖ «Ruby Wing» by @jabaorder ➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🐸 𝗝𝗔𝗕𝗔 |⚡️𝗕𝗼𝗼𝘀𝘁⭐️

3 Jun 2025, 00:02 UTC≈21,600 views91 reactions37 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

🎁 | #Concept ➖➖➖➖➖➖ «Stalker Glory» by @jabaorder ➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🐸 𝗝𝗔𝗕𝗔 |⚡️𝗕𝗼𝗼𝘀𝘁⭐️

custom 530346482585726127091

3 Jun 2025, 00:01 UTC≈17,100 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👨‍💻

custom 530346482585726127037

11 Sept 2024, 08:00 UTC≈25,200 views226 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @blumcrypto

🥳

custom 5388620876147085686115custom 527638941644779042246custom 538644786321347925638custom 542052661193607231827

6 Sept 2024, 13:06 UTC≈21,700 views83 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🐸⭐️ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✨ Hey! We have prepared the JABA Brand Book for you to use for your own benefit. ✨ Links to materials and logos ▶️TAP◀️ ✨ Main post ▶️TAP◀️ 🔠 #JABA #BlumMemepad ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🐸 𝗝𝗔𝗕𝗔 |⚡️𝗕𝗼𝗼𝘀𝘁⭐️

custom 538862087614708568630custom 538644786321347925623custom 527638941644779042215custom 538655783155612636215

5 Sept 2024, 13:28 UTC≈17,900 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

😐

custom 542052661193607231821custom 530346482585726127016

26 Aug 2024, 12:20 UTC≈18,300 views102 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🥪

custom 535936870429755682150custom 527638941644779042220custom 535952612343889002615custom 535935898049159847811custom 53034648258572612706

24 Aug 2024, 22:01 UTC≈16,300 views87 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

✈️🥷

custom 530346482585726127040custom 523105912471999820819custom 530322026182949157217custom 527638941644779042211

16 Aug 2024, 14:28 UTC≈19,000 views188 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤑 × 🐸 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ — Приєднуйтесь до нашого плем'я в blum! — Join our tribe blum! ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔽Tap «JOIN» @Blum @Blum @Blum ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔠 #JABA #BLUM #BlumMemepad ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🐸 𝗝𝗔𝗕𝗔 |⚡️𝗕𝗼𝗼𝘀𝘁⭐️

custom 542052661193607231879custom 523105912471999820851custom 527638941644779042224custom 530322026182949157215custom 530346482585726127011custom 53031060328792887448

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JabaTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 826,458 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JABA” (@JabaTelegram), 2,189 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JabaTelegram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.