Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

千里雪官方频道

@JXESP

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,737subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002576632108
TypeChannel
Username@JXESP
Description
Created9 May 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JXESP

Growth

9,7379,7609,748.57 August 2026 — 9,760 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,753 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,737 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,734–9,763 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 16:279,737-16
7 Aug 2026, 20:219,753-7
7 Aug 2026, 15:029,760first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 9 May 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.2%
avg views ÷ 9,737 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,980
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held34 (9 May 202512 August 2026)
Views total154,495
Reactions total18,893
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

54,123 reactions across 31 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10,60319.6%
🔥10,49519.4%
10,38819.2%
🎉10,20418.9%
😁9,83218.2%
🌚5441.01%
👾5240.968%
🤩4070.752%
🥰3490.645%
👏3290.608%
😍1100.203%
💯1080.2%
❤‍🔥940.174%
😢500.092%
😱360.067%
🌭240.044%
😡120.022%
😭80.015%
🍓30.006%
🤔20.004%
1 further kind10.002%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54,123reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2025 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 33 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @JXESP. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 May 2025 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC238 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

公益版本过检测没和谐,正常使用 公益卡密 @JXESP

2👍2

12 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC323 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

收费使用此版本 更新拦截结算ai分析检测 购卡访问 雪喆.top

👍5

11 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC79 viewsread 12 August 2026

我把ai检测写到验证强制开启你们小学生投稿我不炸了😁

11 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC84 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

你们快去玩我的破解版😁😁 少了个ai过检测 说白了破解的跟我普通公益版本效果一样 ai检测被删了

11 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC87 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

明天更新新版本 结算检测 还有这个每局结束后大厅ai分析检测

2

11 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC262 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

千里雪收费内存版本 卡网 雪喆.top 框架乱射48杀就是此版本 稳定性堪比熊猫👍👍

👍3❤‍🔥2🌚2😱2

11 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC640 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

框架打的,飞天加速,一把48杀,一把27杀内存版本收费,拦截AI检测以及mtp上报

👍91😡1

10 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC633 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

巅峰66星局,强锁自瞄+范围+飞天+全枪自动+射速+牙签乱射+射速+跳伞加速+广角+秒救队友 六十六星局杀了44个,没封号👍 扣扣表情预计今天发布

26👍4😡3

10 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC≈1,980 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

千里雪的官网已开发完成 点 雪喆.top 进入 访问官网需要关闭外网VPN

👍31

9 Aug 2026, 21:49 UTC≈1,690 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://t.me/+YUQyODDunXEyZGVl 英文名字不能进,想进的改中文名字 https://t.me/souso?start=a_7785910361 so搜索机器人🤖 👉https://t.me/xbso1?start=a_7785910361 新币搜索机器人🤖 (刚玩纸飞机必备搜索机器人🤖)

😢50😱342

9 Aug 2026, 20:51 UTC≈1,790 views158 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @CrownKernel

子追和功能修复好了

👍2826🤩26🔥24🎉19🥰18👏17

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @JXESP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 175,326 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“千里雪官方频道” (@JXESP), 9,737 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JXESP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.