Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for JUNKIE CATS PORTAL

Channel

JUNKIE CATS PORTAL

@JUNKIECATS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

251subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002087272026
TypeChannel
Username@JUNKIECATS
Created3 April 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JUNKIECATS

Growth

251254252.57 August 2026 — 254 subscribers7 August 2026 — 254 subscribers8 August 2026 — 252 subscribers14 August 2026 — 251 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 251–254 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 11:18251-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:42252-2
7 Aug 2026, 02:03254no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:31254first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 3 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4639.3%
2319.7%
👍1714.5%
💩108.55%
🖕108.55%
🏆54.27%
🥰32.56%
👏10.855%
🤡10.855%
🤣10.855%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2024 to 19 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Apr 2024, 20:09 UTC≈1,460 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Click down there to join the junkies club Click below to verify you're human

👍1

14 Apr 2024, 21:41 UTC≈2,250 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

We are officially listed on bsc scan now ! Congratulations junkies ❤️‍🔥 Check out the link https://bscscan.com/token/0x353D21dABdb6dD97958A95Df13E0753a24B561b1

💩75👍3

14 Apr 2024, 15:28 UTCviews —

JUNKIE CATS PORTAL pinned «We are glad to announce that we will start selling our nfts collection.❤️‍🔥 👉Epic 100 piece for 1bnb 👉Legendary 200 piece for 0.7 bnb 👉Rare 200 piece for 0.45 bnb 👉Common 500 piece for 0.25bnb 🟢Epic nft holders will get 1% share of the tax every month…»

14 Apr 2024, 15:28 UTC≈1,860 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

We are glad to announce that we will start selling our nfts collection.❤️‍🔥 👉Epic 100 piece for 1bnb 👉Legendary 200 piece for 0.7 bnb 👉Rare 200 piece for 0.45 bnb 👉Common 500 piece for 0.25bnb 🟢Epic nft holders will get 1% share of the tax every month 🟢Legendary nft holders will get 10% of the supply allocated to reward 🟢Rare nft holders will get 5% of the supply allocated to reward them 🟢Common nft will get fre

3💩3

13 Apr 2024, 11:52 UTC≈1,530 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Click down there to join the junkies club Click below to verify you're human

👍1

9 Apr 2024, 21:53 UTC≈4,740 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Our FL is now live https://www.pinksale.finance/launchpad/bsc/0x611eA968858b6dFAF8E205ee93217316Ddce679B

🔥23🏆4🖕4👍2🥰2🤣1

8 Apr 2024, 09:55 UTC≈4,850 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥15🖕4👍32

8 Apr 2024, 08:38 UTC≈4,290 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

We officially completed our kyc and Audit with cyberscope. Happy to announce our partnership with them ❤️‍🔥 Kyc https://github.com/cyberscope-io/kyc/blob/main/junkie/kyc.png https://www.coinscope.co/coin/junkie/kyc https://twitter.com/cyberscope_io/status/1777228487318794673 Audit https://cyberscope.io/audits/junkie

🔥83👍2🖕2👏1🥰1

8 Apr 2024, 04:10 UTC≈3,430 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Audit by cfg ninja have been done successful❤️‍🔥 Check it out https://audit.cfg.ninja/junkie-cats

3 Apr 2024, 22:43 UTC≈5,980 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Click down there to join the junkies club Click below to verify you're human

10👍5🏆1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @JUNKIECATS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,461,753 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JUNKIE CATS PORTAL” (@JUNKIECATS), 251 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JUNKIECATS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.