Channel
@JS_EugeneZinoviev
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
159subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003843327509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JS_EugeneZinoviev |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JS_EugeneZinoviev |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 159 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 158 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 158 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
73 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 27 | 37.0% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 31.5% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 28.8% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.37% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 6 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Крест с бриллиантами и выемчатой горячей эмалью. ⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜ Данное украшение было изменено несколько раз до того, как мы с заказчиком пришли к окончательному дизайну. Данная модель технически довольно не простая из-за много составной конфигурации. Каждую деталь (ушко с бриллиантами, скобы, крест с выемчатой горячей эмалью) необходимо было довести до готового состояния и только после все собирать в одну конструкцию. …
🔥12👍4❤1
Из старого в новое. ⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜ Не так давно принесли кольцо с квадратными бриллиантами, сделанное достаточно давно. Моё предложение было переделать дизайн и открыть все камни. Саму накладку решили сделать из платины. В итоге получилось очень неплохо. Форма и очертания кольца остались те же, изменилась только подача. Вроде небольшие правки, но результат совершенно другой.
👍12❤3
Про восстановление платинового кольца. ⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜ Некоторое время назад при случайном ударе кольца, бриллиант стал шататься и произошла небольшая деформация не только посадочного места, но и верхней части крепления бриллианта. Попытки ювелиром как-то прижать его оставшимся на краях металлом не увенчались успехом. Бриллиант так и не смогли закрепить. Кольцо оказалось у меня по рекомендации других мастеров. Мне сразу стал …
❤13👍2🤩1
Так выглядят изделия с горячими ювелирными эмалями до обработки и после. ⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜ Есть выражение :"Эмаль дороже золота". Оно имеет вполне обоснованное определение за счёт сложности самого процесса изготовления. Сначала эмаль измельчают в порошок определенной фракции, затем укладывают на заготовку и после запекают в печи при температуре 750-800°С. Не всегда удается довести его до конца. Порой бывает и скалывается 😕сама…
👍5🔥5❤1🏆1
Одна из популярных и часто заказываемых обручальных колец из платины или белого золота. Выполнено полностью в ручную с уникальной разделкой под бриллианты в стиле "Fishtail" или другое название French Cut. Отличается своей лёгкостью, утонченностью и изысканностью. . Возможно украсить кольцо не только по всему кругу, но так же и наполовину или 2/3 кольца.
🔥10❤3
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @JS_EugeneZinoviev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ювелирная студия Евгения Зиновьева” (@JS_EugeneZinoviev), 159 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JS_EugeneZinoviev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.