Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مۣۗمـلَـكۣۗہهۣۗهۣۗہ ﮼،النور،المبين ،

Channel

مۣۗمـلَـكۣۗہهۣۗهۣۗہ ﮼،النور،المبين ،

@JQUde

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,376subscribers

-477 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001038424235
TypeChannel
Username@JQUde
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/JQUde

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@mkapwc/478217 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC@JQUde/247429 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC1.00under a minute
@mkapwc/478227 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC@JQUde/247430 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC1.00under a minute
@mkapwc/478247 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC@JQUde/247432 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC1.00under a minute
@mkapwc/478277 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC@JQUde/247435 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC1.00under a minute
@mkapwc/478708 Aug 2026, 01:59 UTC@JQUde/247445 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC1.002 minutes
@mkapwc/478838 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC@JQUde/247450 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mkapwc6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@mkapwc (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 38 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @mkapwc. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4,3764,8534,614.57 August 2026 — 4,853 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,853 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,846 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,822 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,809 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,797 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,767 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,753 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,744 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,729 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,715 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,686 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,670 subscribers16 September 2026 — 4,640 subscribers2 October 2026 — 4,568 subscribers8 October 2026 — 4,526 subscribers13 October 2026 — 4,505 subscribers17 October 2026 — 4,491 subscribers20 October 2026 — 4,481 subscribers23 October 2026 — 4,470 subscribers25 October 2026 — 4,456 subscribers28 October 2026 — 4,450 subscribers31 October 2026 — 4,437 subscribers3 November 2026 — 4,423 subscribers6 November 2026 — 4,400 subscribers10 November 2026 — 4,376 subscribers7 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -477. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,304–4,925 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 09:164,376-24
6 Nov 2026, 12:504,400-23
3 Nov 2026, 10:314,423-14
31 Oct 2026, 11:294,437-13
28 Oct 2026, 19:284,450-6
25 Oct 2026, 23:364,456-14
23 Oct 2026, 05:084,470-11
20 Oct 2026, 15:484,481-10
17 Oct 2026, 06:454,491-14
13 Oct 2026, 22:514,505-21
8 Oct 2026, 22:364,526-42
2 Oct 2026, 04:004,568-72
16 Sept 2026, 07:174,640-30
12 Sept 2026, 06:414,670-16
7 Sept 2026, 21:364,686-29
2 Sept 2026, 21:344,715-14
30 Aug 2026, 17:164,729-15
27 Aug 2026, 20:234,744-9
25 Aug 2026, 01:254,753-14
21 Aug 2026, 03:584,767first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 62 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 48s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026

«اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما صَلَّيْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ، اللَّهُمَّ بَارِكْ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما بَارَكْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ» .

11 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC16 viewsread 12 August 2026

«اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما صَلَّيْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ، اللَّهُمَّ بَارِكْ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما بَارَكْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ» .

11 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026

«اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما صَلَّيْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ، اللَّهُمَّ بَارِكْ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما بَارَكْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ» .

11 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC15 viewsread 12 August 2026

«اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما صَلَّيْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ، اللَّهُمَّ بَارِكْ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما بَارَكْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ» .

11 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC11 viewsread 12 August 2026

«اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما صَلَّيْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ، اللَّهُمَّ بَارِكْ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما بَارَكْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ» .

11 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026

«اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما صَلَّيْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ، اللَّهُمَّ بَارِكْ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما بَارَكْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ» .

11 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026

«اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما صَلَّيْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ، اللَّهُمَّ بَارِكْ علَى مُحَمَّدٍ، وعلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ، كما بَارَكْتَ علَى آلِ إبْرَاهِيمَ، إنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ» .

11 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026

لوكان الكلام يكتب بالذهب لكتب هذا خطب عبد الملك بن مروان -رحمه الله :- خطبة بليغة ، ثم قطعها وبكى ، ثم قال : يارب إن ذنوبي عظيمة ، وان قليل عفوك أعظم منها ،فامح بقليل عفوك عظيم ذنوبي ، فبلغ ذلك الحسن البصري فبكى ، وقال: لو كان كلام يكتب بالذهب لكتب هذا. 📘 ( تهذيب التهذيب ٣٧٤/٦)

11 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026

🩸الشرك أشد شيء يدنس النفوس إذا وجد الشرك في المرء احبط عمله قال الله تعالى :ولان اشركت ليحبطن عملك

11 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026
File

تلاوة مباركة ما تيسر من سورة البقرة بصوت الشيـخ الفاضـل: أبـي حمــــــــزة عيسى المصنف حفظه الله 🍃🍃

11 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

💥فائدة عظيمة 🔹الشيخ عبد الرزاق البدر حفظه الله

11 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

🔻 أعظم دعاء 📊الشيخ عبد الرزاق البدر حفظه الله

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @JQUde. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTCAnonymous Quiz3 voters

وصف النبي ﷺ تراب الجنة بـ ......؟

  1. العود0%
  2. اللؤلؤ0%
  3. العنبر0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

خواطر مــابقلبـــــي❤️∞~
@sarab_1_1 · 24,641
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
‏﮼زحمة مشاعر ღ ..♩🕊💜
@anta3mree · 18,876
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 October 2026
عبارات حب نرجسيه رمنسيه ♥️
@kliopqweryyuu · 37,434
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 30 August 2026
اقتباسات ايمانيه 🧚🏼‍♀️قطوفها دانية 🍀
@qwefghu · 26,740
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 September 2026
‏بـوح بدويه♥️🎼
@ak_aak · 30,184
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
زحمة شعور 😴❕🤍
@sadig770 · 25,430
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 September 2026
عيسى العدواني
@issaaladwani · 43,042
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 1 September 2026
| السعـــــادة | حياتنا | -_^
@fmokhtar22 · 18,666
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 October 2026
abodate_1
@abodate_1 · 2
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
عبارات حب نرجسيه💜
@T9x_i99 · 122,322
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مۣۗمـلَـكۣۗہهۣۗهۣۗہ ﮼،النور،المبين ،” (@JQUde), 4,376 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JQUde.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.