Channel
@JP872
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,834subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001875744739 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JP872 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JP872 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 3,834 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 3,840 | +9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 3,831 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 3,830 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 3,830 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (15 June 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,147 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#Angel工作日常ing~ 每個月最重要的環節已完成~ 妹妹們的 #身體健康檢查 都安排上啦～ 這是不夜谷每個月必備的流程之一，這也是Angel一直以來最重視、親自把關的部分 8月的身體檢查已經完成啦😉 大大們放心享受，Angel不只把大家把關性福，也確保每位妹妹都能以最健康、最好的狀態 來為大大們提供服務，所有安排都是在安全、透明、乾淨的前提下進行，Angel會持續替大家把好每一道關卡💖 #讓大大們約前安心約後舒心😉
🚨第一次來日本體驗外約？一定要先看這篇！ 最近有很多新加入的總裁，也有不少第一次來日本體驗外約服務的朋友，為了讓大家預約流程更順利，也避免一些常見問題，Angel 重新整理了一份 最新版《外約注意事項》內容比之前更加完整、清楚，也新增了許多重要提醒。 📌圖片內提供的是各項注意事項的重點整理，方便大家快速閱讀，如想查看每一條規定的完整說明與詳細內容，請點擊下方連結即可查看 希望每位總裁都能有一個安全、愉快、順利的體驗，也感謝大家一直以來對Angel的信任與配合 ❤️ 1️⃣關於“拍攝”注意事項！ 鏈接▶️ t.me/JP872/329 鏈接▶️ t.me/JP872/228 2️⃣關於“酒店”注意事項！ 鏈接▶️ t.me/JP872/246 鏈接▶️ t.me/JP872/514 3️⃣關於“住家”注意事項！ 鏈接▶️ t.me/JP872/386 鏈接▶️ t.me/JP872/291 4️⃣關於“打槍”注…
#為什麼金額超過10萬要多這一步？ 不少大大曾經問過Angel，為什麼單次預約金額超過 100,000日圓（例如多節預約、高單價方案）時，妹妹收款後還需要將費用交給司機（小助理）確認保管呢？ 其實這個流程一開始並不存在，之所以增加這一步，是因為過去曾經發生過一次金額確認上的問題，讓Angel深刻感受到，只要金額越高，就越需要多一層確認，保障客人與妹妹雙方的權益，很多規則都不是憑空制定的，而是曾經真的發生過真實事件，才慢慢建立起來的，每一條規定的背後，都是希望避免同樣的事情再次發生，保障每一位客人的權益 事情回到三年前，當時有一位大大預約了高單價的服務，總金額為180,000日圓，約會結束後，妹妹回報收到的金額是120,000日圓，但大大也非常確定自己當時付的是180,000日圓 雙方都有自己的記憶與說法，當時Angel也沒有在現場，所以無法確認當下到底發生了什麼，是金額點錯？是過程中有遺漏？還是雙方產生了誤會？只聽大大的…
#預約模版 為了更快速、更精準的為總裁們篩選安排合適的妹妹，也讓總裁們擁有更好的約會體驗，麻煩總裁們預約前提供以下資訊，Angel會依照的需求來篩選最符合喜好的女生 約會地點： 約會時間： 約會節數： 一節預算： 類型要求： 雷區禁忌： 身材要求： 個人愛好： 特殊服務： PS：以上項目可依照個人需求填寫，若沒有特別要求可留空，Angel 也會依照您的預算與喜好推薦最適合的人選 Angel⭐ JP8689 Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878
想必很多人在人生地不熟的地方，最怕遇到的就是突發麻煩和自己無法解決的問題 講真的，如果哪天真的遇到棘手狀況，你是不是也希望身邊有個靠譜的介紹人，能立刻為你站出來處理、替你撐腰？為你處理事情呢？ 大部分的人心裡的答案都是一樣的 #希望有人能保護自己 找一位靠譜的介紹人有多重要，看看影片上的狀況，大家心理都有答案，介紹人的存在不是多一個人插手約會，而是多一份保障和安心，每個大大對我來說都像來自五湖四海的朋友，我希望你們出來玩可以享受到最安心最有保障的約會，多一份保障何嘗不好，不用擔心安全問題，不用擔心出現問題沒人解決，出來玩本來就是想要開開心心的，開開心心的來當然也要開開心心的回家 我的角色就是你的保護傘，不是製造衝突或麻煩，而是確保你每次約會都能安心、放心，沒有後顧之憂的享受，介紹人的存在無非是多一份保障，不管遇到什麼情況，我都會站在你這邊，替你處理，讓你在任何情況下都能有個依靠！
#會不會踩雷啊 #會不會不是我想要的啊 今天和大家來探討一些比較現實層面的問題 ①#會不會踩雷啊 ②#會不會不是我想要的啊 這兩個問題可以說是差不多一個意思 有一些老茶客約過很多次了，但是就約不到自己想要的妹妹為什麽嘞？但也有玩的很開心的，為什麽有人可以玩的很開心有人卻約不到自己想要的妹妹呢？那我們今天來分析喔！ ①是不是我們沒有把自己的需求表達清楚，在不瞭解你想要的類型情況下安排的 ②是不是我們的要求超出了我的預算，只有40000的預算但是想要60000素質的妹妹 如果你的類型和需求你都表達了，介紹人也知道你想要的類型也知道你的需求，同時你的預算也能約到你想要的妹妹，踩雷的機率可以說很底 #沒準確的表達自己的需求： 如果你喜歡的類型也沒有表達你的需求也沒有說，只說了一個預算，那介紹人的話，很大的機率會從你的預算中挑選給你，比較多人會喜歡的類型，大眾款，蘿蔔白菜各有所愛，不是所有都喜歡學生妹，也不是所有人都愛櫃姐，…
‼️Angel溫馨提醒‼️ 如果有需要開愛情旅館的朋友們，建議在約定的時間提早30分鐘先去開好房唷，避免客滿沒有房間的情況，臨忙臨時又找不到房間，有提前預約妹妹都會準時到達指定地點，如果因為現場等房而耽誤了時間，會從服務時間裏面扣，我會覺得這樣很可惜也不划算~ 所以朋友們，提前準備好讓約會更完美~ 站客人的角度來寫 然後讓客人覺得我們在為他思考 並且 讓客人覺得是對他們有利的 Angel⭐ JP8689 Angel🌐 t.me/dy947 Angel🌐 t.me/AV3878 官 網🌐 www.JP838.com
📌不夜谷高級俱樂部 ・ 頻道導航 歡迎來到不夜谷，為了讓各位總裁們能更快速找到相對應的資訊，可直接點擊下方對應的【按鈕】直接跳轉至各專屬群組‼️
#外約注意事項： 😏 #不私下留聯絡方式 嚴禁跟妹妹互留聯絡方式，今天出來玩就是玩刺激、新鮮、安全很重要、不要暈船（私留妹妹聯絡方式出現任何問題（如詐騙、經濟糾紛、被仙人跳）等後果自負，Angel概不負責） 😏 #有問題當下說當下處理 如果妹妹先走或者在進入房間沒有服務、再者就是拖延時間。請你不要等妹妹離開在說，一定在第一時間馬上告知Angel，這樣Angel會在第一時間幫你處理，當下事情當下處理。 😏 #保護好個人財產 出門在外，身上的財產要自己保護好，不管是在什麽地方都要做到保護好 個人財產 記住任何地方都是一樣喔~ 😏 #養成提前預約的好習慣 養成預約的好習慣，妹妹種類多選擇性更多， 當下要當下約你想要的妹妹不一定都有時間 😏 #請勿私下給小費 有一些妹妹剛下海不懂會問客人要小費記得不要給，賺錢都不容易，就以你跟Angel談的價格為準不多給也不等妹到了凹價 😏 #事事有交代事事有回應 如果臨時有特殊情況需要…
#知道為什麽我會建議大家多節嗎？ 其實不瞞大家說，我自己也是一個極度注重感覺和體驗的人，之前小妹我第一次體驗，不懂怕時間太長浪費，體驗過一次一節之後，老實說，真的太趕了時間很緊湊！感覺才剛來、要高潮了，正想要好好享受，結果時間就這麽不知不覺的到了，那種「剛到一半被喊停」的無奈，懂的人都懂！😂 經過第一次的體驗，當然我也學到學聰明了，只要我出去，絕對是兩節或三節起跳，你說要做多少次嘛其實還好，我要的就是過程中能帶給我的感覺，當時間夠的時候，享受到就不只是抽插了哈哈哈哈，什麽調情、挑逗、前戲的深情激吻呀，樣樣做好做滿，過程中的情緒價值直接拉滿！一節真的已經滿足不了我了哈哈🤣食色性也的道理大家都懂，出來本來就是想放鬆的嘛，那就讓自己好好享受一下，不過分～ 當然節數根據自己的需求選擇，如果今天只是純粹發泄欲火、想快速解決，一節完全夠用，但如果是想要的滿滿的「女友感」和那種被捧在手心上的互動體驗，相信以我過來人的經驗，兩節以上才能讓…
【新手老司機外約注意事項】 🍧#關於約會方式 Angel這邊屬於外約上門服務，女生約到酒店提供服務，不是定點也不是工作室！ 🍦#營業時間 日本時間中午11點 ~ 凌晨2點 🍓PS：中午13點妹妹才開始陸陸續續報班喔，如果想要約13點，麻煩大大提前一天預約喔，Angel好幫你們處理時間問題 🍧#提前預約 養成提前預約妹妹的好習慣，優質的妹妹大家都想要，為了保證你要的品質，請提前預約，不然臨時會比較趕，我會盡量幫你找好妹，那妹妹這邊也需要等，避免你等很久，那你就提前預約喔 🍓PS：如果想要準時到的話，那友友們要提前預約喔，妹妹可以提前出發可以準時到喔，臨時約妹妹只能臨時出門，需要耐心等待 🍦#記得守時 記得約定的時間前開好房間，如果約下班高峰期的友友要掌握好時間喔，下班幾乎都會塞車，記得掌握好時間，避免妹妹到了哥哥還在路上，如果是有事或者塞車，趕不上約定的時間，麻煩提前告知Angel，妹妹這邊我好安撫跟處理 🍓…
❤1
#為什麼妹妹會問要不要提前離開的問題？🤔 很多大大來體驗日本妹妹的時候，常常會被一些台日文化差異給驚訝到，所謂的地方不一樣，文化真的大不相同！ 🥤習慣上： 在日本，店家給客人遞上「冰水」才是最高級的尊重和體貼（代表用上最好的冰塊和誠意）但如果在其他國家，給冰水可能被覺得不體貼，反而要送上熱茶 📱觀念上： 很多日本人回訊息通常不會「秒回」因為對她們來說，秒回代表「沒有經過認真思考就隨便回覆」反而稍微沉澱一下再認真回，才是對對方的禮貌 所以呀！很多大大遇到服務結束、進入休息時間的時候，妹妹會特地詢問您的意見，這真的不是妹妹想偷懶偷跑，更不是在趕時間喔！ 日本的服務生態主打的就是「服務至上」加上日本女生心思比較細膩，她們覺得結束後如果自顧自地一直待在房間裡，怕大大會覺得有壓力、不自在，甚至會打擾到大大想單獨休息的時間，這對她們來說反而是一種不禮貌的行為，所以她們詢問的目的，其實是想把最完美的「空間主導權」交到大大手上 有些…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @JP872. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 84,091 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇯🇵東京/大阪不夜谷新手指南🐣” (@JP872), 3,834 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JP872.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.