Channel
@JP859
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,202subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002375898170 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JP859 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JP859 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 5,202 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:51 | 5,204 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 5,210 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 5,209 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 5,209 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (9 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,546 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#東京心得分享~ #歐美肥臀~ 誰懂！東京旅行最後一天，約到一直心心念念的 #歐美肥臀 一直都記得大大喜歡歐美臀 剛好今天有就趕緊和大大說 這不就成功解鎖了 #夢中情臀 嗎哈哈哈🤣 來都來了 #必須玩的開心玩的盡興 大屁股控的他此時此刻已經得到滿足哈哈哈 大大說 #下次來還要約他😋 PS：大屁股控在哪！臀控必點！ Angel⭐: JP8689 Angel🌐: t.me/dy947 Angel🌐: t.me/AV3878 客 評🌐: t.me/JP859 官 網📱 www.JP838.com ✨品質我來把關 你只管安心享受✨
#東京心得分享~ #A4腰正妹 嗚呼~ 是誰又又又收到好評了哇~ 哈哈哈原來是Angel呀~😛 來自新朋友 #體驗兩節之後的心得分享~ 真不是我說！ #難道這就是傳說中的A4腰嗎！ 這腰細的我都羨慕🤣 又會提供情緒價值，又會說英文，身材比例又好 誰約誰不迷糊啊😳 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 服務很好，讚，很合作，外貌身材都很好，肌膚超滑，腰很細，重點情緒價值高，佢英文都ok，少量英文，再加翻譯都溝通得到，大家都有傾有講幾開心，佢都好開心，下次再試 Angel⭐: JP8689 Angel🌐: t.me/dy947 Angel🌐: t.me/AV3878 客 評🌐: t.me/JP859 官 網📱 www.JP838.com ✨品質我來把關 你只管安心享受✨
#回約~ #東京心得分享~ 嗚呼，老朋友回約他的老相好啦 上次想要臨時加節沒加成功 一直念念不忘 這次剛好碰上妹妹有空大大也有空 #直接拿下兩節 把上次沒幹的今天都給他幹回來哈哈哈🤣 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 還是一如以往的好身材，一樣的正，這次多了上次一節，感覺真的不一樣，一樣先聊個天再去洗澡，再來就是正事，第一次我太久而妹妹已經高潮不知道幾次，然後就抱著小睡了一下，之後妹妹就直接滑下去吹了一段時間口技真的了得，接著開始第二次的戰鬥，妹妹真的很敏感只要高潮都會夾，身體也會抖表情還是聲音真的都很讚，之後再一起去泡個澡結束這一次約會 Angel⭐: JP8689 Angel🌐: t.me/dy947 Angel🌐: t.me/AV3878 客 評🌐: t.me/JP859 官 網📱 www.JP838.com ✨品質我來把關 你只管安心享受✨
#私房菜+1 #大阪心得分享~ 來自老朋友的心得分享，這是和好哥哥配合的第23次，這次來個不一樣的無照私房菜 體驗完也是成功俘獲好哥哥的心 好哥哥說 #過程故意不寫讓其他大大自行體驗 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 妹妹像個小女友般躺在我的胸膛上，讓我玩弄著她小巧粉嫩的乳頭，妹妹也不甘示弱的撫摸著我的肉棒，接著主動騎乘上來，從脖子一路往下親吻著，賣力的吸吮著肉棒，差一點就被吸出水來了，妹妹也不急著插入，前戲玩好玩滿，用那尖挺的美乳幫我洗臉，讓我吸含舔弄著她小巧的乳頭，引導我玩弄她的小豆豆，直到妹妹小穴濕到高潮出水抖動著身體 整體來說，很好聊、有禮貌，不偷時，唯一要注意的是妹妹是敏感體質，可能會弄濕床單，怕弄髒床單請斟酌 🤩私房菜資訊 t.me/dy946/35 Angel⭐: JP8689 Angel🌐: t.me/dy947 Angel🌐: t.me/AV3878 客 評🌐: t.me/JP859 官 網📱 www.JP…
#新朋友+1 #東京心得分享~ 嗚呼，兩節完美完結啦~ 來自新朋友的心得分享~ 大大說 #我也不知道說什麽好反正我挺滿意的符合我要求😳 偷偷說 下次記得叫我美女哈哈哈😂 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🥰恩客反饋：妹子性格挺好 很好聊天 知道我不会日文也很会不耐烦的用翻译和我聊天 另外身材和皮肤必须夸一下 水嫩 我提出都有配合 配合度我觉得是很OK的 我也不知道说什么好 反正我挺满意的符合我要求 Angel⭐: JP8689 Angel🌐: t.me/dy947 Angel🌐: t.me/AV3878 客 評🌐: t.me/JP859 官 網📱 www.JP838.com ✨品質我來把關 你只管安心享受✨
#悶騷學生~ #大阪心得分享~ 有一種悶騷叫看着乖實則壞，有一種安排叫聽Angel的，自從嘗試了Angel推薦的妹妹之後，自己選的妹妹都不太敢嘗試了🤣🤣🤣 別問為什麽 問就是他自己選的踩雷了 心情久久不能平復 這次臨時出差一樣少不了櫻花妹妹來助興 一樣這次交給Angel推薦 就說嘛 #聽Angel言性福在眼前😁 ⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 我覺得真的可愛，但硬要挑毛病的話是英文不能溝通🤣但服務是不錯，他的的叫聲很狂野我很喜歡，我狂舔他奶頭跟吸她奶頭他也會一直叫，而且他是越叫越大聲，我就越撞越大力，謝謝啦讓我體驗一個臨時讚讚的行程 上次那個學生妹好緊🤣🤣我超難放進去😈然後還給我叫的淫蕩然後還給我叫的淫蕩，我還打他屁股😎邊幹邊打，就是悶騷，幹爽了玩開就原形畢露😈 #心得：學生妹果然會玩 一開始有夠悶騷最後玩開了自己在那邊給我叫的越來大聲 最後給我一直發抖 抓床單 洗澡也是不馬虎 眼神對到就親嘴 真的有夠開心 短暫的大阪遊爽爽的…
#清秀正妹 #東京心得分享 嘿嘿，是誰又又又收到小黃文啦~ 原來是Angel呀，來自新朋友的小黃文~ #大大說不漂亮肛塞謝罪 哈哈哈 我就說嘛~ 不會給你這個看我肛塞的機會 該說不說 #清秀正妹 還是這麽拿得出手🤭 ⭐⭐⭐🌟🌟🌟⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 名字：アイ 身高：163 年齡：22 罩杯：B 體驗感：第一眼看到就被驚艷到，高挑正妹，顏值在我交手過的櫻花妹中絕對排前三。進到房間相當乾脆，三兩下就脫個精光，整套內衣褲，造型相當可愛。精緻挺拔小奶奶，配上頂級軟綿綿翹臀，後入的絕佳對象。洗澡細心又溫柔，每一處都不放過，乾乾淨淨。上了床，配合度十足，給摸給親，同時也對你又摸又親，能跟如此顏值的正妹有如此交流，可說此生無憾了。妹妹的下面是超乾淨的無毛一線鮑，舔起來有股淡淡的香味，進入的過程務必要慢，緊緻程度堪比未成年，一陣翻雲覆雨，把幾億子孫送進了妹妹的桃花源。再次洗澡，進入賢者時間，妹妹的賢者時間比較沒有互動，可能累了，就是玩著手機…
#東京心得分享~ #Angel盲盒系列~ 哈哈哈哈哈，Angel什麽實力不用多說，表鍋用心得為我發言，來自廣西表鍋的開盲盒體驗分享，誰懂這是一個兩極反轉哈哈哈，從開始已做好打槍的準備，到體驗完的贊不絶口，你以為這是一次隨隨便便的盲盒嗎？NONONONO大NO特NO，此類盲盒來自Angel特推系列，開盲盒主打有質量的盲盒🤭 #在兄弟群分享主打就是一個萬眾矚目🤣 就說嘛信Angel得性福😉 偷偷說 #這文筆真的牛哈哈哈 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 👆心得在上圖👆 Angel⭐: JP8689 Angel🌐: t.me/dy947 Angel🌐: t.me/AV3878 客 評🌐: t.me/JP859 官 網📱 www.JP838.com ✨品質我來把關 你只管安心享受✨
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @JP859. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 19,344 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇯🇵東京/大阪不夜谷客評回訪✍️” (@JP859), 5,202 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JP859.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.