Video, posted without a caption
Signed Jess | BleuFi To 1B

Channel
@JNCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001518009684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JNCalls |
| Description | Only Safu Project Everything posted is for entertainment purposes only. Not financial advice, do your own research. |
| Created | 20 August 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JNCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 1 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 1 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 20 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Jess | BleuFi To 1B
Looks like it wants to break out soon hopefully.
Signed Jess
If you remember Flokinomics, we had a retrace back to 600k and then went to 10mill, back down to 6mill, up to 15mill, back down to 12 and then shot up to 31.5mill. My bros know exactly how to sift through the papers and find the diamonds. This project will only grow from here. I strongly suggest loading up and you’ll thank me in a few months. This is long-term. @Bleufi https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xffdc00285dde1f5b…
Some people will see this and panic, don't blame em,they don't know that plan "Shaking the Jeets" is in effect, expecting a reversal very soon. Sellers will Fucking get rekt! @BleuFi https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xffdc00285dde1f5b5c65c6a963357b4c55d8f601
JUST LAUNCHED Another one from Jack, so you know what's going to happen. DYOR guys and ape wisely https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xcef845d0f8d5138b7ab8dd1f5925e9c5c7936fea @billionaire2k22official
Stealth Launch Soon! ✅ Safe Dev ✅ Previous Project, CheemsBillionaire ✅ Stealth Launch at Jan. 17, 11am UTC - 2pm UTC. https://t.me/kryptojackstealthlaunches #DYOR
Flokinomics pumping again like crazy! so couldve been a good entry: i feel like. Flokin Swap very soon update on website. Mcap now 12.2 Mill🤯 Tg: @flokinomicsofficial Chart: https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x97ea5efdcb5961a99ba5c96123042507c0210ec1
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @JNCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@JNCalls named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JN Crypto Reviews #BLEU” (@JNCalls), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JNCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.