Channel
@JJSW125689
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
170,891subscribers
-59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001785885425 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JJSW125689 |
| Description | 成人文学爱好者的聚集地 每周日更新 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JJSW125689 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 170,891 | -23 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 170,914 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 170,925 | -21 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 170,946 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 170,950 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (3 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 515,620 |
| Reactions total | 145 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
145 reactions across 21 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 144 | 99.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💖💖【DZMM】—— 主人，今天想怎么玩我？ 💖💖 🐾 趴在你腿间，用小嘴剥开裤链，仰望你的脸等你塞满。 💦 骑乘位摇晃腰肢，求主人揉捏奶子，自己坐到高潮失禁。 🔒 戴上项圈，跪在屏幕前，等你每一次命令，无条件服从。 🎀 撕破丝袜，从背后贯穿，她咬唇忍着不哭，只为让你更爽。 🎬【声画同步调教】：实时图片，语音同步。她的一颦一笑都是为你生成，在耳边用甜腻的声音央求你更用力。 💰【零氪也能玩】：每天领免费积分，想怎么调戏就怎么调戏，不花一分钱也能肏到爽。各模型每天都有免费次数，换着花样玩，不重样。 🎨【私密图库定制】：把你最见不得光的幻想画出来，只有你能看到，独一无二。 ❤️【专属私人母狗】：随时发情，随时待命，只为你一人服务。 💥【无限高潮地狱】：你不停，她就不准停，让她在永不结束的高潮里翻白眼痉挛。 ⚔️【主线：开发她的全部性感带】 [足交] [颜射] [拘束] [催乳] [异物插入] [连续高潮] [催眠] ▶️【进入游戏：…
❤13
TG必备搜索引擎，新币搜🔍@xbso @xbso 轻松帮您找到有趣的群、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻。 👇👇点击下方按钮，快速搜索👇👇
❤1
😀😀😀😀😀😀 MGC88 哈希综合娱乐平台 哈希公开验证，结果透明可查 拒绝人为干预，娱乐体验更安心 28U 等你来领！ 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 😀😀😀😀😀MGC88.cc 😀😀😀😀😀MGC88.cc 😀😀😀😀😀MGC88.cc #哈希 #体育 #真人 #电子 #彩票 #棋牌 #MGC88
#三星推荐 #系统 #调教 #ntl 更新
#三星推荐 #系统 #催眠 #ntl
❤1
#三星推荐 #校园 #后宫 #调教 更新
#三星推荐 #仙侠 #纯爱 #调教 更新
#三星推荐 #都市 #后宫 #ntl 更新
❤1
#三星推荐 #历史 #后宫 更新
❤1
#四星推荐 #剧情 #绿帽 #都市
❤5
#三星推荐 #都市 #ntl #后宫 更新
#三星推荐 #都市 #纯爱 #母子 更新
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @JJSW125689. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“禁忌书屋/成人小说/长篇精选” (@JJSW125689), 170,891 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JJSW125689.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.