友台分享 t.me/relaxhotel 最優質 最穩妥 信心之選

Channel
請支持 友台 RXhotel Relaxhotel
@JChotG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,603subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001518811804 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JChotG |
| Created | 21 September 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JChotG |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 2,603 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:10 | 2,607 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 2,610 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 2,610 | first reading |
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 21 September 2021 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
友台分享 t.me/rxhotel 最優質 最穩妥 信心之選
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @JChotG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@JChotG named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“請支持 友台 RXhotel Relaxhotel” (@JChotG), 2,603 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JChotG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.