以上是永久性彻底解决TG双向限制的方法,上面有常见三种情况,看你属于哪种就使用哪种解决方法。 有些人是过度营销,那可能无法解封。有些人是主动去私聊别人,但是出口成脏,账号废了是正常。

Channel
解除Telegram双向限制
@JCXZ7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,542subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001749481349 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JCXZ7 |
| Created | 10 October 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JCXZ7 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 3,542 | +9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 3,533 | +8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 3,525 | +18 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 3,507 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 3,519 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 3,518 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 3,518 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 10 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
如果是这样的提示,那依次选三个选项 This is a mistake Yes No! Never did that! 然后它说一段话,结尾是what went wrong? 你可以回复下面这段话(点击复制): I think I haven’t sent any messages to strangers recently. I only talked a few words with my friends in the group. Why was I reported? 然后就等待审核结果吧,也许几分钟,几十分钟,也许半天。
但少数人的账号可能是因为滥发垃圾信息导致账号被限制,那么就需要按照上图那样选择语句,最后需要手动输入accident发送即可。反正看见机器人回复的语句带soon这个单词,稍等片刻就行。
图二
图一
【只能给双向联系人发送消息的彻底解决方法】 有些人不能私聊陌生人,提示如下面图一。 原因是telegram限制了部分+86手机号注册的账号。 这时点击提示框的“详情”直接进入机器人界面,或者点击“确定”后再点击 @SpamBot 进入机器人界面,接着点击机器人界面下面的“开始”。 然后根据下面图二那样选择两句话,But I can’t message non-contacts! 和 No,最后等待几分钟就可以私聊了,有时候十多秒后就可以私聊了。 如果还不行,就点击提示框“确定”,再点击发不出去的那句话下面的感叹号即可,不行就重复点击几次感叹号,还不行再稍等片刻。问题解决后,就可以永久性的和任何陌生人私聊。
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @JCXZ7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 144,472 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“解除Telegram双向限制” (@JCXZ7), 3,542 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JCXZ7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.