3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45–51 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 15:23
50
+4
10 Aug 2026, 14:16
46
no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:53
46
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
316.6%
avg views ÷ 50 subscribers
Avg views / post
158
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
20 (10 February 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
1,108
Reactions total
34
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
1m 32s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
79 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
44
55.7%
👍
11
13.9%
❤🔥
8
10.1%
👎
5
6.33%
👏
4
5.06%
✍
3
3.80%
🙏
2
2.53%
👌
1
1.27%
🔥
1
1.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
کبریت همیشه بی خطر نیست..
تاملی درباره یِ کرمیت..و مسئله یِ معیارِ نوشتاریِ زبانِ لری..
-------------------☆☆
به نظرم در بحث دربارهٔ استفاده از واژهٔ «کرمیت» به جای «کبریت»، باید چند موضوع را از یکدیگر تفکیک کنیم..
اول اینکه من اصلن معتقد نیستم "کرمیت"واژهای اشتباه ست یا نباید از آن استفاده کرد..بل چنان که واقفیم زبانِ زنده در دهانِ گویشوران تغییر میکند و بسیاری از این تغییرات.. بخشی از خودِ نظامِ آوایی زبان هست…
ما میخواهیم با این زبان برای تهران و اصفهان و مشهد و پاریس و لندن و نیویورک هم نامه بنویسیم.. بنابراین زبانِ نوشتاری ما باید هم ریشه در زبانِ واقعی مردم داشته باشد و هم بتواند از مرزهای یک منطقه و یک طایفه عبور کند..
برای انتخاب یک واژه یِ معیار بنابراین تنها زنده بودن آن کافی نیست.. شاید لازم باشد به پرسشهای دیگری هم توجه کنیم..
این واژه چه گسترهای دارد؟
در چند منطقه و میان چه تعداد از گویشوران استفاده میشود؟
…
پستِ موقت..
تجربه های نو..و تاملی کوتاه بر زیستِ واقعی زبان..
-------------------------☆☆
با سلام..
پیش از هر سخنی..لازم میدانم از دیارِ عزیز بابتِ زحمتی که برای زبانِ لری بر دوش گرفتهاند..صمیمانه تشکر کنم..
ترجمه و انتشار چنین آثاری..فقط برگرداندنِ چند داستان به زبانی دیگر نیست..بلکه تلاشی است برای زنده نگه داشتن جهانی که زبان لری آن را روایت میکند..
امیدوارم این مسیرِ ارزشمند با همین انگیزه ادامه پیدا کند و ر…
📚 کتاب الکترونیک متل لوڒی
نخستین کتاب الکترونیک داستان کوتاه به خط پاپریک
زبان: لُری
گویش: بختیاری میانی
موضوع: داستان کوتاه (کودک و نوجوان)
مترجم: دیار
تقدیم به همه لُروَندان❤️
#زبان_لری
#خط_پاپریک
@Lurishsongs | واویره لٛوڒ
صحبت های دکتر اردشیر بهرامی..جامعه شناس..درباره ی پستِ قبل..👇👇
یک توضیح..جناب دکتر بهرامی از رویِ شاگرد نوازی بنده را دکتر خطاب فرمودند..خدمت دوستان عرض کنم..که من مدرکِ دکترا ندارم...
🛜ایلان ماسک، دۉلهمندترین پیا گرده ۉ دیوۊندار اٛسپیساؽکس وه اٛکونومیست گوئڌه پَڒکدَسکار(هۊشمصنۊعی) زه پڒک آڌمی فرهتر اؽڒه ۉ دی کس نؽگره جلاؤسه. هو اؽگو 10 سال دی پڒکدسکار همهچی اؽتره بۊ غیرا آڌمی!
@astare_lur
-------------------------☆☆
طرحِ یک سوال؟
------------------------☆☆
پیش از هر چیز باید از تلاش ارزشمند نویسندهی این متن تشکر کرد که خبرهای روزِ جهان را به زبانِ لری منتشر می کنند.. و با این کار نشان…
خنده هایِ غمگین
-----‐----------☆☆
چقدر به این طنز خندیدم..انگار که هیچ غمی ندارم..اما برعکس است..ما آنقدر رنج کشیده ایم که دیگر راهی به جز خندیدن به رنجهایمان نمانده..
اینکه می خندیم ولی میدانیم واقعیت آن بیرون تغییر نمیکند..طنز فقط چند لحظه خندیدن نیست..درد را از بین نمی برد..نگرانی ها سرجایشان هستند..فقط برای لحظاتی آدمی..بارِ سنگینِ زندگی را با لبخند بر دوش می کشد..
شاید شکلِ دیگری از به یاد آوردن است..اعترافی …
نه یک دلال زمین..او حق فروش یا واگذاری چراگاههای طایفه را به غیر نداشت
امروز نیز تمرکز جمعیتی و مالکیتها در مناطق بختیاری سند زنده این ادعاست.. در دشت اندیکا، اراضی بر اساس ساختارِ طایفهای سنتی..بین چند ایلِ دورکی و بهداروند و بابادی..تقسیم شدهاند..در شهرستانِ لالی.. زمینهای کشاورزی تاریخی به طایفه اسیوند تعلق دارند و سایر طوایفِ ساکن در آنجا، اصطلاحن خوشنشین..(فاقد حق مالکیت زمین نیاکانی) محسوب میشوند..(البت…
افسانه یِ فئودالیسم در لرها..
تحلیلِ تطبیقیِ ساختارِ مالکیت، اقلیم و مقاومت طایفهای در میان لرها در برابر مدل ارباب-رعیتی فلات مرکزی..
-------☆☆
چکیده..
----------☆☆
در تاریخنگاریِ معاصر ایران..و دوبیشتر در تحلیلهایِ پساانقلاب سفید (۱۳۴۱).. ساختارِ اجتماعی-اقتصادی مناطقِ لرنشین (لرهای کوچک و بزرگ) به اشتباه با مدلِ "ارباب-رعیتی"فلاتِ مرکزی همسانپنداری شده است..
این پژوهش با رویکردِ انسانشناسیِ سیاسی و اقتص…
از هابز تا مال..
بازآراییِ بقا..
-------------------------
در نگاهِ توماس هابز..انسان زمانی که در غیابِ نظمِ پایدار و اعتماد اجتماعی قرار میگیرد..واردِ وضعیتی میشود که در آن امنیت دیگر دادنی نیست..
او این وضعیت را "وضعِ طبیعی" مینامد..جایی که زندگی انسانی.. از یک افقِ قابلِ پیشبینی..به میدانی غیر قابلِ پیش بینی تبدیل میشود..
حالا اگر این منطق را از سطح فلسفهی سیاسی به تجربهیِ امروزِ خودمان بیاوریم..ما با جها…
سوگواریِ انتخابی..
----------------------------------------
سیاست در ایران دیگر میدانِ گفتوگو نیست..بلکه تبدیل به میدانِ صفآرایی شده است..
در جغرافیایِ ایران..دو جبهه در برابر هم ایستادهاند..اما هر دو از یک منطق پیروی میکنند..
دوگانه ای آخرالزمانی که جهانِ زیسته یِ آدمها را به دو قطبِ اخلاقی تقسیم می کند..
در روایتِ جمهوریِ اسلامی این دوگانه با زبانی دینی بیان می شود و از نبردِ میانِ "حق و باطل" سخن میگوید و …
❤1
Signed Arash Saba
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JAHANELORI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 371,321 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جـهـان لری✍United Kingdom” (@JAHANELORI), 50 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JAHANELORI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.