Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Izbrannik

Channel

Izbrannik

@Izbranniw

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

626subscribers

+578 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003911992717
TypeChannel
Username@Izbranniw
Created29 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Izbranniw

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

486703598 August 2026 — 48 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52 subscribers16 August 2026 — 162 subscribers25 August 2026 — 236 subscribers1 September 2026 — 305 subscribers10 September 2026 — 359 subscribers26 September 2026 — 670 subscribers7 October 2026 — 626 subscribers6268 August 20267 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 60 days, net +578. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 20:56626-44
26 Sept 2026, 22:58670+311
10 Sept 2026, 19:16359+54
1 Sept 2026, 12:24305+69
25 Aug 2026, 03:14236+74
16 Aug 2026, 22:23162+110
10 Aug 2026, 10:1652no change
8 Aug 2026, 19:4152+4
8 Aug 2026, 10:5648first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54314494138494864653738.1%
custom 54607300742170961971616.5%
custom 53909816221012232721111.3%
custom 53345814344200738971010.3%
custom 53481365444797570381010.3%
custom 526946224408468510055.15%
custom 519763988970055653733.09%
custom 538658708887333182933.09%
custom 527147797961088606822.06%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Izbranniw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC49 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Это имба?❤️❤️❤️

custom 546073007421709619710custom 54314494138494864652custom 51976398897005565371custom 52694622440846851001custom 52714779796108860681custom 53481365444797570381custom 53909816221012232721

9 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC56 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Оставить🇷🇺🇺🇦?

custom 53481365444797570389custom 52694622440846851004custom 52714779796108860681

9 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC59 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Накинул вам новых реакций❤️🤷😢

custom 533458143442007389710custom 53909816221012232724custom 53865870888733318292custom 51976398897005565371custom 54314494138494864651

9 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC61 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Почему не грузит😭

custom 54314494138494864654custom 53909816221012232722custom 53865870888733318291

9 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC68 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

КТО ЭТО И ЗАЧЕМ МНЕ ЕГО ЛЯГУШКА🤩

custom 54314494138494864655

8 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC72 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я в ахере спасибо тебе огромное просто ты лучший избранник спасибо еще раз🥲

custom 54314494138494864653custom 54607300742170961972custom 53909816221012232721

7 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC101 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

фаст ком на мишку, выдача в коментах

custom 54314494138494864655custom 53909816221012232721custom 54607300742170961971

7 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC104 views8 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

Что по просмотрам?🥶 Думаю, вы тоже задавались этим вопросом, короче. Сейчас на моем тт аккаунте теневой бан.🤩 Из-за него мои видео почти не появляются в реках. Честно, я хз, когда его снимут, но надеюсь, что очень скоро. Скорее всего, это из-за ухода на время. На скринах мои просмотры старых видео.

custom 54314494138494864656custom 51976398897005565371custom 54607300742170961971

6 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC103 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Щас эту тему продам и раздарю вам❤️

custom 54314494138494864657custom 53909816221012232721custom 54607300742170961971

6 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC98 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ура канал

custom 54314494138494864654custom 53909816221012232721custom 54607300742170961971

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Izbranniw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Izbrannik” (@Izbranniw), 626 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Izbranniw.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.