Channel
@ItzeyDumb
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001527588247 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ItzeyDumb |
| Description | contact person : @SantLace @SantLaceRobot ποΈ: @SantlaceArchive |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 1 November 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ItzeyDumb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 8 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 8 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 November 2021 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
π¦ππ‘π§ππππ. pinned Β«we're disband, feel free to leave from this channel. thank you semuanya!Β»
we're disband, feel free to leave from this channel. thank you semuanya!
thank you Wonrous π€π€
The date has turned to the 22nd of November! It is time to blow out the candles on this magnificent day! Happy month anniversary to these amazing groups @EricCamp @ItzeyDumb @Weeedalso @Fourspa and @Loonacys. May your special days be filled with tons of joy and happiness, I wish you all the best and see you on the next month with the same date! Lotβs of love and hugs, Wonrous β‘
thank you Residencexo π€
Today, @Loonacys, @Stereocy, @ItzeyDumb, and @Keranjay are meeting up again with 22th. With this open letter, we would like to congratulate you guys for having another chance to celebrate your mensiversary. Not only that, we would like also wishing and hoping you guys to be more successful and all the good, the best things to be happening in the future. Thank you for the hard work, the intention, you've worked hard.β¦
thank you The Monotones π€
β β Enlivening the shrill tone full of enthusiasm and the all-powerful cheers to @Keranjay @EricCamp @Loonacys and @ItzeyDumb congratulation for sticking on each other on another 22nd of the month! We hope you keep smiling and can defeat the enemies in the world. Stay solid and always success for the future. We meet on the 22nd again with the same accompaniment. Tone of Love, πππ ππππ β ππππππΈ
thank you Gyu Arcade π€
Morning dews fall from the top of the leaves along with the majestic wind. The sound of the birds chirping and the sound of the dews fall down from the roof one by one. The wind blews leisurely among the aurora skies, this morning we shall utter a felicitation for those who's celebrating their mensiversary; @Keranjay @ItzeyDumb @loonacys @EricCamp. As a symbol of their friendship that had bonded well, they merrily deβ¦
thank you Seorinade & Keranjay π€
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ItzeyDumb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 1,100,497 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ItzeyDumb named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ¦ππ‘π§ππππ.β (@ItzeyDumb), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ItzeyDumb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.