Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 84 days, net +5,474. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,772–30,888 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Oct 2026, 13:08
30,067
+109
29 Oct 2026, 13:37
29,958
+115
28 Oct 2026, 14:28
29,843
+92
27 Oct 2026, 12:01
29,751
+83
26 Oct 2026, 13:18
29,668
+90
25 Oct 2026, 12:15
29,578
+15
24 Oct 2026, 13:50
29,563
-11
23 Oct 2026, 14:37
29,574
-9
22 Oct 2026, 15:36
29,583
+29
21 Oct 2026, 11:51
29,554
+62
20 Oct 2026, 12:16
29,492
+32
19 Oct 2026, 13:08
29,460
+21
18 Oct 2026, 14:50
29,439
+73
17 Oct 2026, 17:28
29,366
+45
16 Oct 2026, 16:37
29,321
+57
15 Oct 2026, 13:49
29,264
+37
14 Oct 2026, 15:07
29,227
+91
13 Oct 2026, 02:30
29,136
+40
8 Oct 2026, 21:56
29,096
+302
4 Oct 2026, 09:16
28,794
first reading
Engagement
283 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 134 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.75%
avg views ÷ 30,067 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,330
114 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
114
of 283 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held
283 (26 July 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total
265,766
Reactions total
3,526
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Oct 2026, 22:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
310
Videos
125
Links
59
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
14m 04s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,682 reactions across 282 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,187
48.6%
🔥
2,286
21.4%
💯
1,189
11.1%
🐳
803
7.52%
👍
316
2.96%
🥰
178
1.67%
🙏
172
1.61%
👏
148
1.39%
🎉
128
1.20%
🏆
122
1.14%
⚡
81
0.758%
😍
72
0.674%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 282 of the 283 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,682 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 283 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Getting a lot of messages—our Instagram is STILL DOWN. We currently have ZERO active IG accounts.
Need to reach us? Follow us on X or join our Whop and message us there.
We appreciate everyone checking in and supporting us!! 🙏🏽
OUR X ACCOUNT 👈🏽
WHOP COMMUNITY 👈🏽
LAST WEEKEND WAS A FUCKING MOVIE 🎥🔥
We’ve been CRUSHING football. 👑
Now you get the ENTIRE WEEKEND for only $49.
FRIDAY Saturday + Sunday. Every play we bet!!
The results are right there. Come ride with ISW. 🔒
30 spots only at this price first 30
ONLY $49 👈🏽👈🏽
Yesterday we took a L on panthers
Am I worried ??
Professionals don’t panic
They can hold the money we get it back this weekend!! This is a marathon not a sprint!
Huge weekend loading.
Last weekend was insane 🔥
39-13-2 ATS in NFL and literally had to send 5 messages here like I’m fucking begging..
Show me someone else doing that and I’ll give u the play FREE!!
Nobody doing that in NFL that’s a fact
Tonight’s NFL game is upgraded to
PLAY OF WEEK! 😳
And I’m hooking up everyone
I know when we got the goods and today is one of those Days!
I’ll be back here after we cash too
I’M IN A GOOD FUCKING MOOD—FUCK IT!! 🔥
BUY TODAY’S CARD, GET FRIDAY FREE.
🚨 NFL MAX TONIGHT 🚨
THE NFL MESSIAH IS CALLING… WHO’S RIDING WITH ME? 👑🏈
Only $49 👈🏽👈🏽
Free MLB
Johnathon Aranda Ov 1.5 H-R-RBIs
1U
3% of bankroll
Let’s cash another free play drop an emoji if your riding!!
❤53🔥24🥰20💯15😍15🎉14👍12🐳3
Showing the 12 most recent of 283 posts we hold for @Isellwinners123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Isellwinners123 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 October 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Real question guys don’t lie we don’t judge how has Nfl been for you this year ?
Winning money45%
Losing money38%
Getting smoked19%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 283 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 30 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
madcapped @madcapper1 · 1,128 (as read 11 September 2026)#60
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Matty Betss BETTING 🤑💰 @mattybetsspicks · 34,997 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
SEANPERRYWINS FREE TELEGRAM🔐 @seanperrywins · 59,267 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 24 August 2026
DPatt’s Free Bets @dpattssportspicks · 74,491 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 24 August 2026
Kleos Sports Free Plays 🐐 @kleossportsfreeplays · 130,657 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
YDC Sports Community @YDCCommunity · 42,768 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
️ TMS Free Plays @heavyhittersnew · 49,371 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
Apex Pro Sports Free Plays 🏆 @ApexProSportsFreePicks · 29,191 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 7 September 2026
PROPHET FREE SPORTS INSIGHTS 🌐🟣 @EliteProphetPlaymakers · 22,759 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ISW FREE COMMUNITY 💎” (@Isellwinners123), 30,067 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Isellwinners123.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.