Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Iron Man Calls - MultiChainVerse

Channel

Iron Man Calls - MultiChainVerse

@IronManCallsMCV

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,801subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001736099201
TypeChannel
Username@IronManCallsMCV
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/IronManCallsMCV

Growth

3,7733,8013,7877 August 2026 — 3,773 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,775 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,782 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,801 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,769–3,805 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:143,801+19
11 Aug 2026, 00:013,782+7
7 Aug 2026, 14:373,775+2
7 Aug 2026, 03:003,773first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4466.7%
🔥1319.7%
🐳34.55%
🎉11.52%
👍11.52%
👏11.52%
💩11.52%
😁11.52%
🤡11.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 25 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Apr 2026, 11:28 UTC≈11,900 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

METAWIN 🎰🤑 The easiest airdrop in crypto is coming in July when MetaWin drops $3M in USDT to their community. Literally all you have to do to qualify is make a metawin.com account and play a spin. I warned you guys before their last airdrop and they gave away $4M last week, a bunch of you got a piece of that airdrop. Don’t fade me on this one… Go make an account. If you’re lucky you’ll flip $3 into $22k like this

20🔥2

Signed Iron Man | WDF™ | 🅳🅴🆅

21 Apr 2026, 11:15 UTC≈11,200 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

METAWIN 🎰🤑 LFG I hope this was one of you who won this! Somebody just turned 11 cents into $5,600 on MetaWin. This is exactly why I said you should get some airdrop exposure. They airdropped $4M in USDT this week and they’re dropping ANOTHER $3M in July to everyone that plays on their site. All you have to do to qualify is make a deposit on metawin.com Go play a couple spins and at a minimum you earn an airdrop,

2

Signed Iron Man | WDF™ | 🅳🅴🆅

15 Apr 2026, 09:21 UTC≈9,310 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

METAWIN 🎰🤑 Congrats to everyone who just got their airdrop! MetaWin just dropped the first $4M in USDT to everyone who played there. If you want a piece of the next one literally just go make a metawin.com account and do a couple spins. Everyone who deposits is going to get part of the next $3M drop. 🎮 https://discord.com/invite/the-arena ✖️ https://x.com/Meta_Winners ✈️ https://t.me/metawinlfg 🤖 @IronManCallsMC

2🔥1

Signed Iron Man | WDF™ | 🅳🅴🆅

17 Mar 2026, 14:50 UTC≈10,700 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I found a great bot for copytrading on SOL. 🤑 You probably know it already. Yes, I'm late 😂

3

Signed Iron Man | WDF™ | 🅳🅴🆅

16 Mar 2026, 13:18 UTC≈10,200 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SOLPriceX

$ 94.15

Signed Iron Man | WDF™ | 🅳🅴🆅

16 Mar 2026, 13:15 UTC≈9,870 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ethprices

🟢 2301$

Signed Iron Man | WDF™ | 🅳🅴🆅

13 Mar 2026, 15:34 UTC≈9,420 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

METAWIN 🎰🤑 I just found something… It looks like the official $METAWIN token account has been created. Seems like TGE is extremely close. A reminder that if you want to qualify for an airdrop, literally all you have to do is deposit on metawin.com Everyone who plays there before TGE gets an airdrop & they gave away $6.5M in prizes to just their NFT community. These guys are the real deal. 🎮 https://discord.com/i

3😁1

Signed Iron Man | WDF™ | 🅳🅴🆅

11 Mar 2026, 15:08 UTC≈7,630 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

METAWIN 🎰🤑 Some of you are fading the easiest airdrop rn… Go make a metawin.com account (everyone who deposits before TGE gets an airdrop) try a few games and even If you lose, you'll still earn a guaranteed airdrop But you may just get lucky and turn $3 into $69,000 like this guy just did The upside is massive, go take advantage while it lasts 🎮 https://discord.com/invite/the-arena ✖️ https://x.com/Meta_Winner

3💩1🤡1

Signed Iron Man | WDF™ | 🅳🅴🆅

7 Mar 2026, 12:32 UTC≈6,480 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Can you tell me the special features of what u voted? I'm still using PHOTON. Convince me to use the platform you are using.

Signed Iron Man | WDF™ | 🅳🅴🆅

6 Mar 2026, 15:17 UTC≈6,360 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

METAWIN 🎰🤑 This is the most obvious play right now Go make a metawin.com account and deposit (everyone who does gets an airdrop) Go spin a bit. If you lose so what.. You still get an airdrop But if you win you walk away with a bag like these guys Asymmetric upside 🎮 https://discord.com/invite/the-arena ✖️ https://x.com/Meta_Winners ✈️ https://t.me/metawinlfg 🤖 @IronManCallsMCV ⚠️ DYOR ⚠️ GAYOR

1

Signed Iron Man | WDF™ | 🅳🅴🆅

5 Mar 2026, 17:23 UTC≈5,330 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

The new standard for what trading bots can do just dropped. Banana Gun is presenting the new, TELEGRAM BOT. It has been totally reworked, providing a new best-in-class user experience on Telegram. Trade tokens across ETH, SOL, BNB, Base, and MegaETH from a single interface. Our devs feel like Thanos bringing all the Infinity Stones together. So, what’s new? 🍌 All-in-one bot; one bot for buying & selling, one bot f

2

Signed Iron Man | WDF™ | 🅳🅴🆅

4 Mar 2026, 13:09 UTC≈4,470 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

METAWIN 🎰🤑 It looks like the $METAWIN launch is coming soon 👀 I think this launch will do quite well as their founder Skelhorn has launched many successful projects in the past and given away over $6.5M to his community. Every single person who makes a deposit on metawin.com/ironmandev is going to get an airdrop when they launch so make sure you deposit and register now before it’s too late! 🎮 https://discord.com

🔥3🐳2🎉1

Signed Iron Man | WDF™ | 🅳🅴🆅

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IronManCallsMCV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Feb 2026, 11:46 UTCAnonymous Poll87 voters

BEST TRADING TERMINALS [SURVEY] Which trading terminal do you use the most?

  1. Photon14%
  2. GMGN32%
  3. Axiom29%
  4. Padre17%
  5. BananaGun13%
  6. SolTrading5%
  7. BonkBot3%
  8. Trojan9%
  9. Jupiter10%
  10. Others (please specify it below)15%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Feb 2026, 06:10 UTCFinal Results55 voters

BEST TRADING TERMINALS [SURVEY] Which trading terminal do you use the most?

  1. Photon13%
  2. GMGN25%
  3. Axiom22%
  4. Padre15%
  5. BullX0%
  6. BananaGun13%
  7. Others (Specify it below)22%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 25 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 402,339 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Iron Man Calls - MultiChainVerse” (@IronManCallsMCV), 3,801 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IronManCallsMCV.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.