Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Счастливая Хозяйка

Channel

Счастливая Хозяйка

@IrinaSokovih

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,747subscribers

-167 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002125302247
TypeChannel
Username@IrinaSokovih
Description⭐️Ирина Соковых 🌸Порядок в доме, голове и жизни 🔥Клуб не идеальных, а счастливых❤️ Мой канал про ТАРО: @taro_tetya_ira Сотрудничество ➡️ @SokovykhIrina Ютуб https://www.youtube.com/@sokovih
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/IrinaSokovih

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,7476,9196,8337 August 2026 — 6,914 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,914 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,919 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,915 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,901 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,878 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,873 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,861 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,849 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,853 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,844 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,827 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,824 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,813 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,777 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,786 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,791 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,783 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,778 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,761 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,751 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,764 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,755 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,752 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,747 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net -167. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,721–6,945 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 21:066,747-5
2 Nov 2026, 13:196,752-3
30 Oct 2026, 08:176,755-9
26 Oct 2026, 23:566,764+13
23 Oct 2026, 14:106,751-10
20 Oct 2026, 05:316,761-17
17 Oct 2026, 08:456,778-5
14 Oct 2026, 19:006,783-8
11 Oct 2026, 12:426,791+5
5 Oct 2026, 06:566,786+9
27 Sept 2026, 00:556,777-36
15 Sept 2026, 07:396,813-11
11 Sept 2026, 11:186,824-3
7 Sept 2026, 04:006,827-17
2 Sept 2026, 18:426,844-9
30 Aug 2026, 13:536,853+4
27 Aug 2026, 06:486,849-12
23 Aug 2026, 22:156,861-12
20 Aug 2026, 13:566,873-5
17 Aug 2026, 10:146,878first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 6,747 subscribers
Avg views / post
719
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held53 (24 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total10,780
Reactions total124
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,430
Videos
≈255
Links
≈660

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 02s
Average length
2m 01s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

386 reactions across 44 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤20653.4%
🔥7519.4%
👍5514.2%
❤‍🔥215.44%
😍112.85%
🍾51.30%
👌41.04%
😁30.777%
🤔20.518%
🥰20.518%
👏10.259%
😱10.259%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 386 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.89%
1 of 53 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
794
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
711
over 52 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHoo2ft131 October 202631 October 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 09:26 UTC456 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Кто-то уже начал готовить подарки к праздникам? 🎁 В ноябре День матери, а там и Новый год не за горами 😅 Самое время присматривать подарки! В Randewoo началась легендарная ЧЕРНАЯ ПЯТНИЦА 👻Огромные скидки на ВСЕ! Можно выгодно взять ароматы в миниатюрах 👇 Для него - Boss Bottled от HUGO BOSS, всего 600 ₽ за 8 мл. Для себя Light Blue от Dolce & Gabbana с цитрусами, как я люблю! А у кого дети - нашла симпатичные бок…

👍3❤‍🔥2🔥2

2 Nov 2026, 04:51 UTC587 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

И напоминаю про КОНКУРС в моем втором блоге: https://t.me/taro_tetya_ira/32

❤1

2 Nov 2026, 04:29 UTC555 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤3🔥1

31 Oct 2026, 09:12 UTC794 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHoo2ftPhoto

Новый год за полярным кругом ❄️ Как же я мечтаю увидеть северное сияние!! Ну вы знаете, я сто раз об этом говорила)) А если встретить Новый год в настоящей русской зиме — с северным сиянием, оленями и снегоходами по тундре?🦌 Вот это я понимаю - исполнение желания!! Организовывать это самой— та еще морока… Проще довериться тем, кто уже возит туда людей не первый год. Например, команде @gelios_travel — в авторском ту…

🔥3

31 Oct 2026, 06:12 UTC635 viewsread 7 November 2026

Все условия конкурса тут: https://t.me/taro_tetya_ira

31 Oct 2026, 06:12 UTC638 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥4

30 Oct 2026, 10:36 UTC731 views9 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Признавайтесь, мамы, у вас тоже бывает такое? ❤️ Когда очень любишь своих детей, но иногда мечтаешь хотя бы о паре часов тишины. Когда весь день заботишься обо всех, а вечером понимаешь, что на себя времени опять не осталось. Когда хочется быть терпеливой мамой, но сил уже нет. А потом приходит чувство вины за то, что устала, раздражалась или хотела побыть одна. Материнство полно любви, но в нём есть и чувства, о…

❤4👍3🔥2

30 Oct 2026, 06:07 UTC689 views23 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Зафиксировала поездку в дневнике памяти. Ведете такой? Или все фотки в телефоне?)

❤12👍6🔥4👏1

29 Oct 2026, 13:51 UTC722 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

💚 Я в последнее время очень много думаю про окружение. Мы часто пытаемся изменить себя усилием воли. “Надо больше читать”. “Надо заняться собой”. “Надо вести финансы”. “Надо чаще куда-то ходить”. “Надо организовать дом”. А потом жизнь идёт как обычно, и все эти “надо” тихо откладываются. И вот что я замечаю: человеку намного легче что-то менять, когда вокруг него это считается обычной жизнью. Если вокруг женщины об…

❤5

29 Oct 2026, 02:44 UTC842 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🐈 Этот пост специально для тех, кто уже думает: «Классный клуб. Но я же знаю себя. Куплю, пару дней похожу, потом пропаду». 😂 Вот поэтому мне и нравится формат КВМ. Курс действительно можно бросить. Вы купили 20 уроков, посмотрели три, потом закрутилась жизнь, открываете через месяц — там ещё 17. И вместе с ними лёгкое чувство вины. С клубом всё иначе. Если вы три дня туда не заходили — ничего не накопилось. Если п…

🔥3❤2👍1

28 Oct 2026, 08:08 UTC759 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Подписывайтесь, это бесплатно)) @taro_tetya_ira

🔥5😍3🍾2

28 Oct 2026, 08:08 UTC708 views6 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤6

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @IrinaSokovih. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Яна Круглова
@yanakruglovayoutube · 22,346
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 September 2026
Екатерина Гурьянова
@ekaterina_guryanova · 38,980
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
Дарья Черненко | Меню недели 🍏 | Кулинарная школа
@Dasha_Chernenko · 92,006
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
Кристина Федорова 🥑КЕТО 👩🏻‍🍼ДЕТСКИЙ СОН 🍎 ВИТАМИНЫ
@kristihair_life · 18,839
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Счастливая Хозяйка” (@IrinaSokovih), 6,747 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IrinaSokovih.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.