Channel
ππππ₯ππππ’π¨π§
@IreflectionI
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
3,663subscribers
+62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001862429916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IreflectionI |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IreflectionI |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 3,663 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 3,666 | +8 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 3,658 | no change |
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 3,658 | +14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:04 | 3,644 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 3,642 | +10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 3,632 | +7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 3,625 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 3,620 | +8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 3,612 | +11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 3,601 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 3,598 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 3,601 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured β we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@musiconmindf Β· 39,259
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 75 here β alongside 74 others β read 31 August 2026
@Gangsteri_Gang Β· 38,475
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 65 here β alongside 64 others β read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππππ₯ππππ’π¨π§β (@IreflectionI), 3,663 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IreflectionI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.