Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Iran AI House | خانه هوش ایران

@Iranai_house

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,150subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002450749844
TypeChannel
Username@Iranai_house
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Iranai_house

Growth

2,1432,1502,146.56 August 2026 — 2,144 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,144 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,143 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,149 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,150 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,142–2,151 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:482,150+1
9 Aug 2026, 22:312,149+6
6 Aug 2026, 17:402,143-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:072,144no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:372,144first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.9%
avg views ÷ 2,150 subscribers
Avg views / post
492
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held21 (26 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total10,325
Reactions total127
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

119 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2521.0%
🔥2319.3%
👌2218.5%
👎1310.9%
😱86.72%
🤣86.72%
75.88%
🤨75.88%
👀54.20%
😁10.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC346 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤖 می‌دونیم هوش مصنوعی اشتباه می‌کنه؛ پس چرا خروجی‌ رو بررسی نمی‌کنیم؟ مدل‌های هوش مصنوعی می‌تونن پاسخی تولید کنن که کاملاً دقیق و متقاعدکننده به نظر برسه، اما در واقع شامل عدد اشتباه، منبع جعلی یا اطلاعات ساختگیه نکته عجیب اینجاست که بیشتر کاربرها از این خطر آگاهن؛ ولی این آگاهی همیشه به رفتار عملی تبدیل نمی‌شه. براساس گزارش «شاخص هوش مصنوعی ایران»: 🔹 حدود ۷۶.۵ درصد از پاسخ‌دهندگان گفتن اعتمادشون به هوش مصنوعی به عو

👍2🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC321 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

پروتکل MCP بزرگ‌ترین تغییر تاریخ خودش رو تجربه کرد تغییر اصلی اینه که MCP دیگر Session نداره و کاملاً Stateless شده‌ست. قبلاً ارتباط بین Client و Server به این شکل بود: Client │ Handshake │ Session ID │ تمام درخواست‌های بعدی اما حالا هر درخواست مستقل ارسال می‌شه: Request 1 Request 2 Request 3 ... یعنی هر Request تمام اطلاعات موردنیاز رو همراه خودش ارسال می‌کنه و دیگه نیازی به نگهداری Session نیست. مزایای ا

👌21

4 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC381 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤖 پشت‌صحنه آموزش ربات‌ها؛ تمرین در دنیای مجازی پیش از ورود به واقعیت ربات‌ها معمولاً قبل از ورود به دنیای واقعی، در محیط‌های مجازی تمرین می‌کنن. در این محیط‌ها می‌تونن بارها اشتباه کنن و دوباره تلاش کنن؛ بدون اینکه چیزی آسیب ببینه یا هزینه زیادی ایجاد بشه ساخت دستی تعداد زیادی از این محیط‌ها، زمان‌بر و پرهزینه‌ست. به همین دلیل، پژوهشگران مؤسسه MIT و مؤسسه تحقیقاتی تویوتا سامانه‌ای به نام SceneSmith طراحی کردن. ای

👍2

3 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC393 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤖 کدوم کارها رو نباید بدون نظارت به هوش مصنوعی بسپریم؟ فرض کنین از هوش مصنوعی می‌خواین براتون ایمیل بنویسه. اگر متن خوب نباشه، می‌تونین اصلاحش کنین. اما اگه هوش مصنوعی خودش ایمیل رو ارسال کنه، پول جابه‌جا کنه یا درباره استخدام افراد تصمیم بگیره، یک اشتباه ساده ممکنه پیامد جدی داشته باشه. پس هوش مصنوعی کجا نباید تصمیم‌گیرنده نهایی باشه؟ ۱. تصمیم‌های پزشکی هوش مصنوعی می‌تونه اطلاعات پزشکی رو خلاصه یا نتایج آزمایش

👍2

2 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC449 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

دعوت به همکاری | Senior AI Developer ✅ خانه هوش ایران به دنبال یک Senior AI Developer متخصص و باتجربه‌ست که روی توسعه، بهینه‌سازی و Deployment مدل‌های هوش مصنوعی در محیط‌های واقعی کار کنه. ✅ در این نقش، شما مسئول طراحی زیرساخت‌های لازم برای اجرای مدل‌های AI بهینه‌شده در محیط Production هستین و به‌عنوان پلی بین پژوهش‌های آکادمیک و سیستم‌های آماده استفاده صنعتی عمل می‌کنین. ✔️ مسئولیت‌ها: ▪️طراحی و پیاده‌سازی End-to

👍4👎4🔥3

1 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC460 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🧠 چرا عامل‌های هوش مصنوعی مکالمات قبلی رو فراموش می‌کنن؟ فرض کنین دیروز جزئیات پروژه‌تون رو برای یک عامل هوش مصنوعی توضیح دادین؛ اما امروز دوباره همون سؤال‌ها رو می‌پرسه. این اتفاق لزوماً به این معنی نیست که مدل اطلاعات رو به خاطر سپرده و بعد فراموش کرده. برای درک بهتر موضوع، باید سه مفهوم رو از هم جدا کنیم: 📌 زمینه یا Context: اطلاعاتی که همین لحظه در اختیار مدل قرار می‌گیره. 📌 تاریخچه گفت‌وگو یا Chat History:

👌4👍1

1 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC470 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

🤖 چرا یک عامل هوش مصنوعی گاهی مکالمات قبلی رو به خاطر نمیاره؟

  1. 🔘 حافظه مدل به‌مرور پاک می‌شه34%
  2. 🔘 بخش مرتبط گفت‌وگوی قبلی دوباره به مدل داده نشده43%
  3. 🔘 اطلاعات جدید، دانش قبلی مدل رو پاک کرده39%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jul 2026, 17:44 UTC576 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

هوش مصنوعی امروز بیشتر در کدوم بخش از کار یا فعالیت شما کاربرد داره؟🧐

  1. یادگیری و آموزش66%
  2. برنامه‌نویسی و توسعه نرم‌افزار56%
  3. طراحی، گرافیک و تولید ویدئو11%
  4. بازاریابی، فروش و توسعه کسب‌وکار8%
  5. تحقیق و پژوهش51%

The shares total 192%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC604 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🧠 ۶ نکته کوتاه و کاربردی درباره ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی بازار ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی با سرعت زیادی تغییر می‌کنه و ابزاری که چند ماه پیش بهترین انتخاب بود، ممکنه امروز برای یک کار مشخص گزینه اول نباشه. این چند نکته می‌تونه در انتخاب دقیق‌تر ابزارها کمکتون کنه: ۱: 📊 مایکروسافت یک زبان جدید برای رسم نمودار با هوش مصنوعی ساخته زبان متن‌باز Flint برای این ساخته شده که ایجنت‌های هوش مصنوعی بتونن با دستورهای کوتاه و قابل‌ویرای

🔥41

29 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC565 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📌 وایب کدینگ دقیقاً چیه و چرا این‌قدر درباره‌ش صحبت می‌شه؟ در روش معمول برنامه‌نویسی، باید مرحله‌به‌مرحله مشخص کنین نرم‌افزار چطور ساخته بشه و بخش زیادی از کد رو خودتون بنویسین. اما در Vibe Coding، بیشتر توضیح میدین که چی می‌خواین ساخته بشه مثلاً به هوش مصنوعی می‌گین: «یک سایت ساده برای معرفی کسب‌وکارم بساز.» بعد مدل کد رو می‌نویسه، نسخه اولیه رو آماده می‌کنه و براساس توضیحات بعدی شما، ظاهر یا قابلیت‌های اون رو تغی

3👀3👍1🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC554 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

میزان آشنایی‌تون با Vibe Coding چقدره؟

  1. اصلاً نمی‌شناسم51%
  2. در حال یادگیری هستم17%
  3. ازش استفاده می‌کنم 😎24%
  4. ترجیح می‌دم خودم کدنویسی کنم15%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥32

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Iranai_house. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTCAnonymous Poll74 voters

🤖 چرا یک عامل هوش مصنوعی گاهی مکالمات قبلی رو به خاطر نمیاره؟

  1. 🔘 حافظه مدل به‌مرور پاک می‌شه34%
  2. 🔘 بخش مرتبط گفت‌وگوی قبلی دوباره به مدل داده نشده43%
  3. 🔘 اطلاعات جدید، دانش قبلی مدل رو پاک کرده39%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jul 2026, 17:44 UTCAnonymous Poll114 voters

هوش مصنوعی امروز بیشتر در کدوم بخش از کار یا فعالیت شما کاربرد داره؟🧐

  1. یادگیری و آموزش66%
  2. برنامه‌نویسی و توسعه نرم‌افزار56%
  3. طراحی، گرافیک و تولید ویدئو11%
  4. بازاریابی، فروش و توسعه کسب‌وکار8%
  5. تحقیق و پژوهش51%

The shares total 192%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

29 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTCAnonymous Poll109 voters

میزان آشنایی‌تون با Vibe Coding چقدره؟

  1. اصلاً نمی‌شناسم51%
  2. در حال یادگیری هستم17%
  3. ازش استفاده می‌کنم 😎24%
  4. ترجیح می‌دم خودم کدنویسی کنم15%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Jul 2026, 18:30 UTCAnonymous Poll74 voters

📊 به نظرتون در آینده نزدیک، پررنگ‌ترین اثر هوش مصنوعی چی خواهد بود؟

  1. سرعت‌گرفتن پیشرفت‌های علمی و پزشکی27%
  2. تغییر گسترده شغل‌ها و مهارت‌های موردنیاز70%
  3. سخت‌ترشدن کنترل قدرت این فناوری30%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTCAnonymous Poll73 voters

موقع انتخاب یک ابزار هوش مصنوعی، کدوم ویژگی براتون مهم‌تره؟

  1. کیفیت و دقت خروجی85%
  2. سرعت پاسخ‌گویی10%
  3. قیمت و دسترسی راحت32%
  4. امکانات و قابلیت‌های بیشتر14%

The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 296,495 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Iran AI House | خانه هوش ایران” (@Iranai_house), 2,150 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Iranai_house.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.