Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری ایران

Channel

مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری ایران

@IranBehavioralInsights

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

189subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001675247453
TypeChannel
Username@IranBehavioralInsights
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/IranBehavioralInsights

Growth

1899 Aug 2026, 07:16 — 189 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 23:35 — 189 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 07:169 Aug 2026, 23:35
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 188–190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 23:35189no change
9 Aug 2026, 07:16189first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
121.4%
avg views ÷ 189 subscribers
Avg views / post
230
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held12 (30 June 202631 July 2026)
Views total918
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2080.0%
👍416.0%
🔥14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

▫️مصرف انرژی در جهان معاصر، بیش از آنکه صرفاً تابع قیمت‌ها یا سیاست‌های دستوری باشد، در بستر رفتارهای روزمره شکل می‌گیرد. بخش قابل‌توجهی از این مصرف در محیط‌های خانگی و کاری رخ می‌دهد؛ جایی که تصمیم‌های افراد اغلب از روی عادت و متأثر از شرایط محیطی هستند. همین موضوع باعث شده ‌است که در کنار سیاست‌گذاری سنتی، توجه به رویکردهای رفتاری برای اثرگذاری بر رفتار مصرف انرژی توسط دولت‌ها و نهادهای بین‌المللی افزایش پیدا کند.

3

31 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC40 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📃#یادداشت‌ها | «ردپای بینش‌های سبز؛ رویکردی که تجارب جهانی را در مدیریت مصرف انرژی دگرگون می‌کند.» 👥 نویسنده: حورا محمدی؛ کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی تربیتی دانشگاه تهران 🏷️ مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری ایران در وب I بله I تلگرام

3

24 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC494 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

▫️ مطالعات اخبار جعلی مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری ایران در رویداد جایزهٔ ملی اثر و در محور مطالعات حوزه رسانه و روایت، به‌عنوان اثر برتر انتخاب شد. ▫️این پروژه حاصل شش سال فعالیت تخصصی و مستمر مرکز بر روی موضوع اخبار جعلی و شامل موارد زیر است: ✔️در حوزهٔ توصیه رفتاری: بینش‌های رفتاری و مقابله با اخبار جعلی؛ راهبردها و دستورالعمل مقابله رفتاری با اخبار غلط و گمراه‌کننده ✔️در حوزهٔ ارزیابی رفتاری: ارزیابـی رفتاری رویکرد نه

3

24 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC348 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📃 #پروژه‌هاوتألیفات | مروری بر مطالعات اخبار جعلی مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری برگزیدهٔ جایزهٔ ملی اثر 🏷️ مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری ایران در وب I بله I تلگرام

1🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC89 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

▫️در دهۀ اخیر، شواهد پژوهشی و تجربه‌های عملیاتی بسیار زیادی در ارتباط با اثرگذاری مداخلات رفتاری در بهبود رفتار مصرف انرژیِ خانوارها و سازمان‌ها به‌دست آمده است. این مداخلات در طیف وسیعی از کشورها و زمینه‌ها و بر روی مخاطبانی با ویژگی‌های جمعیت‌شناختی مختلف اجرا شده و توانسته‌اند با موفقیت، منجر به تغییر رفتار مدنظر شوند. از این حیث، امروزه اقبال گسترده‌ای از سمت دولت‌ها، سازمان‌های بین‌المللی و بخش خصوصیِ فعال در حو

👍3

17 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC64 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📃#یادداشت‌ها | «تلنگرهای محیطی و فرایندی؛ راهکاری نوآورانه برای تغییر رفتار مصرف انرژی خانوارها» 👥 نویسنده : محمدحسن ابراهیم کنی؛ کاندیدای دکتری روان‌شناسی شناختی دانشگاه تهران 🏷️ مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری ایران در وب I بله I تلگرام

1👍1

8 Jul 2026, 19:48 UTC93 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

▫️ کتاب «بینش‌های رفتاری» که با تلاش و همت شما سه عزیز، به‌درستی انتخاب و با دقت ترجمه شده است، را خواندم و لذت بردم. بالطبع، این کتاب را می‌توان در زمرهٔ یکی از منابع معتبر و نسبتاً جدید حوزهٔ علوم رفتاری و، به تعبیری، یکی از آثار مرجع در معرفی رویکرد «بینش‌های رفتاری» قلمداد کرد. ▫️شاید بتوان ادعا کرد که فاصلهٔ میان نظریه‌های اقتصاد رفتاری و کاربردهای عملی آن‌ها در سیاست‌گذاری، چالشی است که همچنان پابرجاست و نویسن

2

8 Jul 2026, 19:48 UTC68 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📕 #کتاب | «این کتاب ارزشمند می‌تواند باب گفتمانی زایشی با رویکرد نقدگرا را در محافل علمی بگشاید و زمینۀ بازآفرینی محتوای بومی در این حوزۀ مطالعاتی را فراهم سازد.» 👥 یادداشتِ دکتر عباس عباس‌پور (هیئت علمی گروه مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، دانشکدهٔ روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی) برای کتاب «بینش‌های رفتاری» 🏷️ مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری ایران در وب I بله I تلگرام

1

3 Jul 2026, 20:30 UTC92 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📸 #گزارش_تصویری | نشست «رونمایی و نقد و بررسی کتاب بینش‌های رفتاری» #کتاب_بینش‌های_رفتاری 🏷️ مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری ایران در وب I بله I تلگرام

2

3 Jul 2026, 20:27 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

▫️در این نشست دکتر رضا پورحسین «هیئت علمی گروه علوم شناختی دانشگاه تهران»، دکتر مهدی دوالفقارزاده «هیئت علمی گروه خط مشی‌گذاری و اداره عمومی دانشگاه تهران»، دکتر علیرضا نفیسی «هیئت علمی دانشکده حکمرانی دانشگاه تهران» و مترجمین کتاب به گفت‌و‌گو حول محور کتاب و کاربست بینش‌های رفتاری در کشور پرداختند. ▫️در ابتدا آقای محمدحسن ابراهیم‌کنی «مدیرعامل مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری ایران» به دلایل انتخاب و ترجمه این کتاب توسط مرکز ا

2

3 Jul 2026, 20:26 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🗞️ #پرونده_نشست | گزارش نشست «رونمایی و نقد و بررسی کتاب بینش‌های رفتاری» 📌این برنامه به همت مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری ایران و خانه اندیشه‌ورزان در تاریخ چهارشنبه ۱۰ تیر ۱۴۰۵ برگزار شد. 🏷️ مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری ایران در وب I بله I تلگرام

2

30 Jun 2026, 18:39 UTC72 viewsread 9 August 2026

📢 #یادآوری | نشست رونمایی و نقد و بررسی کتاب «بینش‌های رفتاری» | فردا (چهارشنبه) ساعت ۱۳ 🌀 با حضور: دکتر رضا پورحسین، دکتر محمدمهدی ذوالفقارزاده، دکتر علیرضا نفیسی، محمدحسن ابراهیم کنی و مترجمان کتاب. 🏢 خانه اندیشه‌ورزان، اتاق کنفرانس 🔺 شرکت در نشست برای عموم علاقه‌مندان آزاد است. 🚀 به‌همراه امکان تهیۀ حضوری کتاب با تخفیف ویژه #کتاب_بینش‌های_رفتاری 🏷️ مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری ایران در وب I بله I تلگرام

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @IranBehavioralInsights. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 960,646 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مرکز بینش‌های رفتاری ایران” (@IranBehavioralInsights), 189 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IranBehavioralInsights.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.