📌 در این پست ببینید دانش بیوانفورماتیک چطور نگاه یک دانشجوی زیستشناسی به پژوهش رو تغییر میده. 🔗 [لینک پست] اینستاگرام | تلگرام | لینکدین | بله | درباره ما ┏━━━━━━ 🆔 @UIBiologists 🌱💡 ┗━━━━━━
👍1🔥1

Channel
@Ir_Genetics_Academy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,833subscribers
+209 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001438677673 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ir_Genetics_Academy |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ir_Genetics_Academy |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 13,833 | +42 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 13,791 | +10 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 13,781 | +11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 13,770 | +7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 13,763 | +3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 13,760 | +14 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 13,746 | +16 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 13,730 | +3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 13,727 | +9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:34 | 13,718 | +7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:35 | 13,711 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 13,709 | +16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 13,693 | +9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 13,684 | +8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 13,676 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 13,679 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 13,678 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 13,673 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 13,672 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 13,682 | first reading |
141 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 141 (2 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 9,302 |
| Reactions total | 148 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 19:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,357 reactions across 135 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 991 | 73.0% | |
| 👍 | 247 | 18.2% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 3.24% | |
| 🤩 | 16 | 1.18% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 1.11% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 0.737% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 0.59% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 0.442% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 0.295% | |
| 😐 | 4 | 0.295% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.221% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.147% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.147% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.147% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.074% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.074% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.074% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 136 of the 141 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,357 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌 در این پست ببینید دانش بیوانفورماتیک چطور نگاه یک دانشجوی زیستشناسی به پژوهش رو تغییر میده. 🔗 [لینک پست] اینستاگرام | تلگرام | لینکدین | بله | درباره ما ┏━━━━━━ 🆔 @UIBiologists 🌱💡 ┗━━━━━━
👍1🔥1
🚀🧠 هوش مصنوعی راهی ارزانتر برای چاپ سهبعدی آلیاژ موشکهای ناسا پیدا کرد 🔬 پژوهشگران دانشگاه ایالتی واشنگتن (WSU) با کمک هوش مصنوعی روشی سریعتر و کمهزینهتر برای چاپ سهبعدی آلیاژ پیشرفته GRCop-42 توسعه دادهاند؛ مادهای که ناسا برای قطعاتی مانند محفظه احتراق موتورهای موشکی استفاده میکند. این فناوری توانست به جای بررسی دستی بیش از ۱۰۰ میلیون ترکیب احتمالی تنظیمات چاپ، تنها با چند ده آزمایش به تنظیمات موفق برسد. …
❤5
🧠 بازسازی نورونها؛ رویکردی تازه برای آسیب آلزایمر! 🔬 پژوهشگران دانشگاه کارولینای جنوبی در مطالعهای جدید که در مجله Cell Biomaterials منتشر شده، رویکردی آزمایشی را معرفی کردهاند که در مدلهای موشی آلزایمر، با تحریک تولید نورونهای جدید، برخی اختلالات شناختی و رفتاری را بهبود داده است. 🧬 این روش که Nano-ERASER نام دارد، یک سامانه نانوژلی تزریقی است که برای تخریب انتخابی پروتئینهای خاص در سلولها طراحی شده است. پژ…
❤8
❓️ پیشتکوینگرایی (Preformationism) چه دیدگاهی درباره رشد جنین داشت؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍3❤2
🧬 چگونه Illumina بازار ژنومیک را متحول کرد؟ ○ چگونه یک فناوری که ریشه در پژوهشهای دانشگاهی داشت، به یکی از مهمترین پلتفرمهای توالییابی DNA در جهان تبدیل شد؟ 🔬 وقتی صحبت از توالییابی ژنوم میشود، نام Illumina تقریباً بلافاصله به ذهن میرسد. مسیر رسیدن این شرکت به چنین جایگاهی، حاصل ترکیب چند دهه پژوهش، توسعه فناوری و تجاریسازی در مقیاس بزرگ بود. 🧪 در دهه ۱۹۹۰، توالییابی DNA هنوز نسبتاً پرهزینه و زمانبر بود.…
❤4👍2🏆1🆒1
🧠 سلولهای مغزی کلیدی برای انگیزه؛ نقش اورکسین در پاداش و تلاش 🗝 🔬 پژوهشگران دانشگاه ناگویا با دستکاری ژنتیکی موشها، نقش حیاتی نورونهای تولیدکننده اورکسین در هیپوتالاموس را برای انگیزه و تلاش برای دریافت پاداش شناسایی کردند. این یافته نشان میدهد که فعالیت این نورونها به صورت لحظهای بر اساس میزان پاداش و سختی کار تنظیم میشود. ⚙️ محققان با استفاده از اصلاحات ژنتیکی، فعالیت نورونهای اورکسین را در موشها افزایش …
❤4👍2
🧠✨ نانوذرات هوشمند؛ چراغی برای یافتن و نابودی سلولهای باقیمانده سرطان مغز 🔬 پژوهشگران دانشگاه فناوری سیدنی (UTS)، هاروارد و دانشگاههای هنان یک سامانه نانوذرهای دوکاره برای مقابله با گلیوبلاستوما، تهاجمیترین سرطان مغز طراحی کردهاند. این فناوری که در مجله Science Translational Medicine منتشر شده، هم به جراحان کمک میکند سلولهای سرطانی را بهتر ببینند و هم پس از جراحی، سلولهای باقیمانده را هدف قرار دهد. 🧬 این …
❤6👍3
آکادمی ژنتیک ایران pinned a photo
🧬 فقط یک ساعت مانده تا وبینار گمشده در تاریخ؛ اما ماندگار در علم این بار در یک گفتوگوی متفاوت، سراغ یکی از چهرههای تأثیرگذار تاریخ ژنتیک ایران میرویم؛ پروفسور محمدعلی مولوی، بنیانگذار علم ژنتیک در ایران. در این برنامه، با نگاهی به مسیر علمی و میراث او، درباره نقش پژوهشگران پیشگام در شکلگیری علم ژنتیک در ایران صحبت میکنیم. 🎙 ارائه دهنده :عرشیا قنبریان و فرزین رودباری ⏰ ساعت ۲۱ تا ۲۲ 🌐 ثبتنام مستقیم https:/…
❤5
🧬 اولین پیوند میتوکندری در جهان؛ تزریق «باتریهای سلولی» از پا به چشم! 👀 🩺 پزشکان برای اولین بار در جهان، میتوکندری را از عضله پای یک زن جوان استخراج و به هر دو چشم او تزریق کردند تا سلولهای آسیبدیده شبکیه را احیا کنند. این روش با وجود اینکه بینایی بیمار را بازنگرداند، ایمنی این روش را برای اولین بار در انسان نشان داد. ⚙️ بیمار ۲۶ سالهای که به دلیل خونریزی شدید مغزی، بینایی خود را تقریباً به طور کامل از دست داد…
❤9👍3🤩3🔥1
🧬 دانشمندان برای اولین بار کلیدهای ژنتیکی اختصاصی برای هر بافت بدن طراحی کردند 👩🔬پژوهشگران موسسه پاتولوژی مولکولی (IMP) در وین، با کمک هوش مصنوعی موفق به طراحی کلیدهای ژنتیکی مصنوعی شدند که میتوانند ژنها را فقط در بافتهای مشخص مانند قلب، مغز یا اندامها روشن کنند. این دستاورد که در مجله معتبر Nature Genetics منتشر شده، آغاز عصر جدیدی در برنامهریزی فعالیت ژنها نام گرفته است. 🧬 اما مشکل این بود که تنها چند صد…
❤9👍1
🧬 وقتی برخی دانشمندان به انسانهای مینیاتوری درون اسپرم باور داشتند! 🪆تصور کنید درون اسپرم یا تخمک، انسانی کاملاً شکلگرفته اما بسیار کوچک وجود داشته باشد؛ ایدهای عجیب که در قرنهای ۱۷ و ۱۸ میلادی، در قالب نظریه پیشتکوینگرایی (Preformationism) توسط برخی دانشمندان مطرح شد. 📝 بر اساس این نظریه، موجود زنده از ابتدا به شکل کامل اما بسیار کوچک در سلول جنسی وجود داشت و رشد تنها به معنای بزرگشدن همان ساختار اولیه تصور…
❤8👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 141 posts we hold for @Ir_Genetics_Academy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❓️ پیشتکوینگرایی (Preformationism) چه دیدگاهی درباره رشد جنین داشت؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❓کدام گزینه بهترین توصیف از Space Omics است؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⁉️ کدام مشاهده در آزمایشهای مندل با نظریه «امتزاج صفات» سازگار نبود؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤔 در یک باکتری E. coli که در محیطی حاوی گلوکز و لاکتوز قرار دارد، جهشی در ژن "lacY" رخ داده است که باعث کاهش ۹۰٪ فعالیت این پروتئین میشود. اگر این باکتری را به محیطی حاوی فقط لاکتوز، بدون گلوکز، منتقل کنیم، کدام وضعیت بهدرستی رخ میدهد؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧬 در کدام مرحله از میوز، نوترکیبی (Crossing Over) بین کروموزومهای همولوگ رخ میدهد؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکادمی ژنتیک ایران” (@Ir_Genetics_Academy), 13,833 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ir_Genetics_Academy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.