Channel photo updated

Channel
Ios频道鸡神是个骗子
@Ios78669
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
67subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002143849228 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ios78669 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 13 December 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ios78669 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 67 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 68 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 69 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 70 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 70 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 13 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 43s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
153 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 51 | 33.3% | |
| 🤡 | 34 | 22.2% | |
| 👏 | 30 | 19.6% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 16.3% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 4.58% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.31% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.31% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.654% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2023 to 20 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
认准唯一 谨防骗子鸡神盗你号骗你钱 tg://user?id=7791598246
认准骗子鸡神tg://user?id=5096219366
骗子鸡神又复活了闲鱼
新的一年开始了,又改了用户名了,谨防被骗,诈骗嫌疑人频道主ios鸡神用户id:5096219366 tg://user?id=5096219366 无论怎么改用户名名称都改不了本质 认准唯一id谨防再次上当受骗 创建再多小号来掩盖自己的诈骗行为都会留下印记耻辱
👍20❤4🍓2
求游戏限购规则有能力搞定的可以联系我价格好说
🤡6
Ios频道鸡神是个骗子 pinned a photo
诈骗嫌疑人频道主ios鸡神用户id:5096219366 tg://user?id=5096219366 无论怎么改用户名名称都改不了本质 认准唯一id谨防再次上当受骗 创建再多小号来掩盖自己的诈骗行为都会留下印记耻辱
👍7❤5👎1👏1
频道主ios鸡神诈骗实名信息 身份证440184199210180974 真名 叶伟强 手机支付宝号码 13202525223 可能马上走要改名 了,其人之道还治其人之身。 人性是贪婪的,身为一个频道要有原则,勿利用粉丝的信任,务必要控制好自己的欲望,别让欲望击穿你的意志,被欲望所掌控贪婪无比,最后没有约束感的丧失自我,迷失自己,贪婪只会让你掉入深渊无法自拔,常在河边走,难免踏湿鞋。
👏29👍8❤3🎉2🤩2
公道自在人心,有理走遍天下,所有的证据如果都是ps大家可以自行侦辨,我是个普通人我为没时间没这个能力ps如此多的以假乱真图片视频,最后鸡神如果从没有做过以上诈骗行为可以全家爆炸💥立誓言,既往不咎
🤡11👍4❤1
最后徒弟应该不是徒弟是他小号,不然不会再我没有曝光前就把我移除他的群拉黑了,他徒弟怎么知道他骗我的事,只有他自己知道提前把我拉黑删除
👍12🤡3❤1
Ios频道鸡神是个骗子 pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Ios78669. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Ios78669 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ios频道鸡神是个骗子” (@Ios78669), 67 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ios78669.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.