Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 45 days, net -417. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 19:20
1
-1,166
17 Sept 2026, 01:42
1,167
-16
13 Sept 2026, 01:58
1,183
+1,182
4 Sept 2026, 05:38
1
-857
27 Aug 2026, 18:43
858
+190
19 Aug 2026, 20:22
668
+249
12 Aug 2026, 16:53
419
+1
12 Aug 2026, 04:00
418
no change
12 Aug 2026, 03:47
418
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
153 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
46
30.1%
👍
38
24.8%
❤
25
16.3%
👌
20
13.1%
🐳
18
11.8%
👏
6
3.92%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Набирал позицию от имбаланса в шорт, в итоге закрыл в минус, буду наблюдать дальше.
Возможно после полного заполнения Имба зайду в позицию.
Вышел так как лои не обновлялись, а хаи да, думал будет просто пересвип ликвидности, но не тут то было.
Доброе утро трейдеры!
Смотрю на график и думаю что настроение сегодня будет шортовое. Впервые за полторы недели азиаты закрываются ниже хая американской сессии, фиксируются возможно, ведь именно они начали этот рост.
На графике показал какое движения хочется увидеть, думаю многие его подметили. Будем наблюдать.
РАЗБОРЫ СДЕЛОК
1.Разбор первой позиции:
После падение было накопление ждал манипуляции и заполнение имбаланса выше, произошла манипуляция и сразу увидел реакцию продавца, стоп поставил за имбаланс первый тейк к ликвидности, второй к имбалансу ниже. Первый тейк забрали быстро ждал подхода к второму, но закрыл в ручную в итоге.
2. Вторая позиция, был свип ликвидности увидел агресивную реакцию, начал набирать лонги. В …
Открывал еще 3 позиции сегодня.
1 - позиция закрыл в минус, сломалась структура сетапа.
2 - позиция забрал первый тейк, второй тейк просто не дотянуло , закрыл остаток руками
Эти две позиции с точками входа и целями выдавались в торговом канале.
3 - позицию просто не успел написать в канал слишком агрессивный выкуп был, позиция отработала отлично забрал все цели.
Итоги дня открыты 4 позиции, 3 из них публичные:
…
По результатам голосования
Сделки — победили 👀
Почти половина проголосовавших хочет видеть больше моих сделок. На самом деле я их публикую регулярно просто основная торговля проходит в отдельном закрытом торговом канале.
Там я выкладываю:
• точки входа в сделки;
• Stop Loss и Take Profit;
• логику, почему рассматриваю именно этот сценарий;
• сопровождение позиции по ходу движения цены;
• результаты как плюсовые, та…
Разбор на 5 минутке.
Азиаты снова активничают, но Лондон не поддерживает их. Есть коррекция, снизу не мало ликвидности для снятия , так же имбаланс как и на 5 минутном таймфрейме , так и на 15 минутном.
Можно попробовать шорт стоп лос выше имбаланса 4351-4353$
Первый тейк поставить к ликвидности - 4342$
Второй ниже 4338$
Всем доброго воскресного дня!
Даю вам анализ графика дневной и 4н таймфрейм.
По дневке еще не было слома структуры, не пробили еще предпоследний Lower high (примерно 4383$), после пробития будет подтверждения BOS.
На 4 часовом таймфрейме у нас есть близко два имбаланса , а так же ордер блок. Если мы рассматриваем подход к ним, нужно узнать объемы покупок в этих зонах, если мы вернемся только к первому имбалансу то…
Стримы с общением (может открывать позиции будем)24%
Разбор моей стратегии34%
The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Invest_timi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Стримы с общением (может открывать позиции будем)24%
Разбор моей стратегии34%
The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тег инвест тими” (@Invest_timi), 1 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Invest_timi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.