Channel
@IntuitiveFashion
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001420607914 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IntuitiveFashion |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IntuitiveFashion |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 2 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 2 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2023 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The audio sequence above is playing on Intuitive Public Radiostream One right now. I'm running it live right this moment. It's actually working. It's totally wild. Tune in: https://intuitive.pub/radiostream/one (!!!)
So!! Intuitive Social Fabric... t.me/IntuitiveFashion/17 • t.me/IntuitiveFashion/18 • t.me/IntuitiveFashion/19 • t.me/IntuitiveFashion/20 • t.me/IntuitiveFashion/21 • t.me/IntuitiveFashion/22 • t.me/IntuitiveFashion/23 t.me/IntuitivePublicRadio/13118
Channel photo updated
And then, as in our generational bodies we moved more into the modern age... ...what are we making? What are we fashioning? "A statement." We're making a cultural vibe where we're taking on a leadership role and saying this is how you should look, this is what you should do, and where does that come from originally? Holding traditional values in the generational community body, that hold the stories that help us …
Fashionable sense, intuition and respect. Radio Pública Intuitiva. This is one of the most important projects in the Intuitive Community Media Network. This is one of the things that we've been striving toward for years and years — it's more than 10 years. (How many more than 10 years now is it? I'm not going to stop to try to do math.) We've been doing a tremendous amount of research for many years specifically a…
...that of course makes it so much more difficult to either maintain or gain or regain an economic position that would allow you to access safe clothing. The clothes on your body! This is a subject we need more people to understand and bring their hearts and minds to. It's a subject intersection where more collaborative solutions implementation is immediately needed. And the people who are sickest are not in a po…
And so in the modern world, if you find yourself having serious physiological injuries, serious health challenges on the basis of exposure to synthetic fragrances... ...as many, many people are... ...you also have to go through these major additional layers of gradually learning and realizing... ...that in order to have the best chance of clearing your environment and your body of the synthetic fragrances that cli…
When someone has this kind of experience, it's significantly complicated... ...by the fact that professional helping organizations, helping professionals, and networks of helping professionals often have NOT been introduced to information about the effects of synthetic fabrics. One of the really big things about synthetic fabrics is... ...if your body experiences severe life-threatening effects from the presence o…
Driftless Intuitive Public Radio! We are broadcasting from the Driftless region of southwest Wisconsin, rural Viola, and Yellow Rocket Sanctuary. Clothing projects! What kind of joy can I communicate right now about how cool it is to get to talk to you about clothing projects? We're on the verge of sewing projects. Are we quite there? We're kind of really close. We're kind of talking about it, restoring, reorient…
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1QkmRJsVAA/
t.me/IntuitiveFashion/15
t.me/IntuitiveFashion/14
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IntuitiveFashion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 482,832 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@IntuitiveFashion named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔊 @IntuitiveFashion • Fashionable Sense, Intuition, & Respect • Radio Publíca Intuitiva • RPI •••” (@IntuitiveFashion), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IntuitiveFashion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.