Channel
@IntelligenceOnChain
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
810subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001866067314 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IntelligenceOnChain |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IntelligenceOnChain |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 15:57 | 810 | +10 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 800 | -1 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 801 | -19 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 820 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 822 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 832 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 833 | -27 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 860 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 860 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
37 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 18 | 48.6% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 32.4% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 10.8% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
WE'RE DOING SOMETHING WE VERY RARELY DO... SO YOU'LL WANT TO PAY ATTENTION. 👀 To celebrate the summer, we're opening a limited number of heavily discounted places on our Blockchain & OSINT Certification Programme. These are the biggest discounts we'll offer this summer: 🎓 First 10 places: 80% OFF (next 48 hours only) 🎓 Next 10 places: 60% OFF (until Friday, midnight UK) 🎓 Final 10 places: 40% OFF (until Sunday…
❤1👍1
Last week, Intelligence On Chain had the opportunity to deliver a bespoke 2-hour blockchain intelligence training session for Merseyside Police. We're proud to support law enforcement by equipping officers with the knowledge and practical skills needed to investigate blockchain-related activity and contribute to safer communities. During the session, we explored how blockchain data can be analysed effectively, incl…
👍6👏2
The tool is only as good as the investigator using it. That’s the principle behind every course we build. The feedback we’ve received recently has been incredible, and I’m genuinely grateful to everyone who has taken the time to share their experience. But one theme keeps appearing… “This feels different.” Why? Because we don’t teach people to rely on a single platform. We focus on the fundamentals: → investigat…
👍2🔥1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL4smUtWqGQ
June Crypto Tracing Challenge - Solution Event: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rugpullfinder_a-lot-of-people-reached-the-wrong-conclusion-ugcPost-7477657003289567232-rV6i/
While we're busy supporting clients and conducting cryptocurrency investigations, we're also delivering live training to investigators, analysts, compliance professionals, and law enforcement teams around the world. June is a busy month at Intelligence On Chain, with three live courses covering blockchain tracing, OSINT attribution, and AI-powered investigative tooling. 📅 UPCOMING TRAINING 🟣 10 June — Level 1: Bloc…
🔥1
HELP US PUSH FOR 500 SUBSCRIBERS ON YOUTUBE Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@intelligenceonchain Click to view on Linkedin and enter the competition
👍2
🚨 HOW TO START A CRYPTO INVESTIGATION 🚨 Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfHYhsXWrog In this video, we walk through the early stages of a crypto investigation and show you how investigators trace digital footprints across wallets, domains, phone numbers, and blockchain activity. Using industry-leading tools like: OSINT Industries - https://osint.industries MetaSleuth - https://metasleuth.io Arkham Intel - ht…
❤7🔥2
It's seems to be a series of seed phrase compromises. You can see here the connection between all victims form. One victim 'JasonBTC888' (shown in yellow) had up to 16 wallets drained! Attacker in red in the middle
Intelligence On Chain pinned «There is a drainer campaign active - Some of the accounts are multiple years old. Please share/comment on the X post: https://x.com/rugpullfinder/status/2050125995835838906?s=20»
There is a drainer campaign active - Some of the accounts are multiple years old. Please share/comment on the X post: https://x.com/rugpullfinder/status/2050125995835838906?s=20
We’re rethinking our entire model - and I’d really value your input. For a long time, people have come to us for help with serious, often difficult situations. And like many services in this space, we’ve charged for that work. But the more we’ve done it, the more something hasn’t sat right: The people who need help the most are often the ones least able to afford it. So we’re exploring a different approach. 👉 Wh…
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IntelligenceOnChain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Intelligence On Chain” (@IntelligenceOnChain), 810 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IntelligenceOnChain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.