Channel
@InsidersLoungeCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,965subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001692074414 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @InsidersLoungeCalls |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/InsidersLoungeCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 1,965 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 1,966 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 1,967 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (15 May 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 534 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Insiders Lounge Calls - ETH, BSC, SOL, AVAX... pinned «Quick update everyone! We’ve already got 20 people up and running with the bot! The response has honestly been better than we expected. If you’ve been thinking about joining, don’t wait too long. We’ll be closing the form once we reach 50 people, and…»
Quick update everyone! We’ve already got 20 people up and running with the bot! The response has honestly been better than we expected. If you’ve been thinking about joining, don’t wait too long. We’ll be closing the form once we reach 50 people, and after that, no new applications will be accepted for this round.
Another solid day for the bot. 📈 Today was a major news day, and Gold made a strong move, but the bot handled the volatility really well and still closed the trades in profit. This is exactly why we’ve spent months testing it across different market conditions before making it available. Bots with this level of automation and trade management can cost tens of thousands of dollars.
Setup has officially started, and a few of you have already begun the process inside this group. Everything is moving smoothly, and more accounts will be handled throughout the day. One important reminder: always verify the bot manager username before sharing any details. Only respond to the confirmed manager to avoid dealing with the wrong one Account: @insidersLbot
Quick update everyone! We’ve received a great response to the form, so to keep everything organized, we’re closing registrations at 50 people. Starting tomorrow, we’ll begin contacting everyone from this @insidersLbot account to help with the setup and make sure everything is ready before August 1st. Thanks to everyone who signed up. We’re excited to get you all set up and have the bot running from day one!
Another update from our testing 👀 After seeing the bot perform well in the live market, I decided to run a 6-month backtest to see how it would have performed over a longer period. 📅 Backtest Period: 1 January 2026 – 30 June 2026 💰 Starting Balance: $5,000 📈 Ending Balance: $11,785 That’s a total profit of $6,785 in just 6 months. Throughout the entire backtest, the bot never closed a single trade at a realized …
Video, posted without a caption
🚀 Testing is finally complete! After almost a year of testing, we’re happy to announce that next month we’ll be opening the bot to the public. One thing we’re proud of is that throughout testing, we never closed a trading day with a realized loss. I say “realized” because there were times when the market moved heavily against the bot. During those periods, the bot used DCA to manage the trades instead of closing a…
Man my dms are flooded lol please fill form i will respond soon.
Insiders Lounge Calls - ETH, BSC, SOL, AVAX... pinned a video
🚀 Early Access is Here! https://forms.gle/fJixfAgeNR3fixY97 After months of testing, we’re opening early access to our community. We’re selecting only 5 people to get FREE access to the bot for the first month. Minimum requirement: $500 trading capital. What you need to know: ✅ You keep full control of your funds. ✅ You never send money to anyone. ✅ No upfront fees. ✅ The bot trades automatically on your own ac…
Crazy move today 😅 Gold kept dropping with almost no decent pullback… around an $80 move against the bot. Even after that, the bot stayed calm, managed the trades, and closed the whole basket in profit. This is exactly why we’re stress testing it before releasing it. So far, it’s handling some really tough market conditions much better than we expected. 👀 Still testing… more updates soon.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @InsidersLoungeCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 324,274 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Insiders Lounge Calls - ETH, BSC, SOL, AVAX...” (@InsidersLoungeCalls), 1,965 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InsidersLoungeCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.