Channel
@Informal_therapist
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
98subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003381732974 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Informal_therapist |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Informal_therapist |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 98 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 95 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (6 August 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,717 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
وقتی به دیروز نگاه میکنم و خودم رو با امروزم مقایسه میکنم، میبینم بالاخره اون قدمی که لازم بوده رو برداشتم؛ حتی اگه کوچیک بودهو همین باعث میشه امروز برام رضایتبخش باشه نه به این معنی که از همهچیزِ خودم راضیم یا به جایی که میخوام رسیدم، بلکه چون میبینم نسبت به دیروز یه قدم جلوترم به نظرم رضایت از خود، لزوماً یعنی دوست داشتنِ تمامِ چیزی که الان هستی نیست گاهی یعنی بتونی کاستیهات رو ببینی، ازشون ناراضی باشی، ول…
منطق core:
یکی از سوالات مورد علاقم:
*
...
در نهایت، همهچیز به مرز اعتماد برمیگرده؛ اینکه بدونی چه چیزی رو، چه زمانی و با چه کسی به اشتراک بذاری. چون هر کسی که شنوندهی داستان زندگی توئه، الزاماً خیرخواهِ قهرمانِ اون داستان نیست .
من همیشه معتقد بودم و هنوز هم باور دارم که بعضی چیزها، به خاطر اینکه خوشحالت میکنن، باید خصوصی بمونن. هر چیزی که بهت آرامش میده، هر اتفاقی که حال دلت رو خوب میکنه لزوماً قرار نیست در معرض نگاه و قضاوت دیگران قرار بگیره واقعیت اینه که آدمها همیشه اونقدر که فکر میکنیم از خوشحالیِ ما خوشحال نمیشن. گاهی حال خوبِ تو، ناخواسته آینهای میشه برای مقایسه یعنی به جای اینکه خوشحالشون کنه، کمبودهاشون رو به خودشون یادآور…
پاش که بیفته هم خوب مینویسم و خوب حرف میزنم اینجا; ولی باید ببینم این دفعه قلمم یا عملم ؟
از این همه «میخوام» و «باید» که هیچوقت به عمل نمیرسن تنفر دارم از آدم گندهگو بودن از تصمیمهایی که فقط توی ذهنم گرفته میشن و همونجا هم میمونن شاید الان زمان اثبات این موضوع بهم بود توی این تاریخ و این سن
وقتی مدام به خودت میگی این کارو میکنم یا از فردا شروع میکنم، این دفعه دیگه جدیام و بعد به قولت عمل نمیکنی، فقط یه کار رو عقب ننداختی؛ کمکم اعتماد خودت به خودت رو از بین میبری آدمی که مدام بهت قول بده و عمل نکنه، بعد از یه مدت حرفهاش برات اعتباری نداره حالا تصور کن اون آدم، خودت باشی وقتی بارها به خودت وعده میدی و زیرش میزنی، ذهنت کمکم یاد میگیره که حرفت رو جدی نگیره. به نظرم بخشی از اون احساس ناکارآمدی…
یه 'چایی' مارو مهمون نمیکنی؟
اونقدر خودتون رو درگیر زندگی معمولی و روزمرگیها نکنید که از رشد کردن جا بمونید؛ نذارید سالها بگذره و چیزی به تواناییهاتون، دانستههاتون و نگاهتون به زندگی اضافه نشه چون یه روز میرسه که سنتون بالا رفته، اما برای سادهترین چیزهایی که باید از مدتها قبل بلد میبودید، هنوز دستتون خالیه .
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Informal_therapist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,374,734 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ܟ تراپیستِ غیر رسمی🎀” (@Informal_therapist), 98 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Informal_therapist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.